/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 10 For the function \(s(t)=\sin t,\... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

For the function \(s(t)=\sin t,\) estimate the area of the region between the graph and the horizontal axis over the interval \(0 \leq t \leq 4\) using a. eight left rectangles b. eight right rectangles c. eight midpoint rectangles d. The actual area, to nine decimal places, of the region beneath the graph of \(s(t)=\sin t,\) is \(1.653643621 .\) Which of the approximations found in parts \(a\) to \(c\) is the most accurate?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Right rectangles approximation is the most accurate with \( A_R \approx 1.557 \).

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Interval Width

The interval given is from 0 to 4. Divide this interval into 8 subintervals. The width \( \Delta t \) of each subinterval is \( \frac{4-0}{8} = 0.5 \).
02

Compute Left Rectangles Approximation

For the left rectangles approximation, evaluate the function at the left endpoint of each subinterval: \( t = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 \). The approximation for the area is:\[ A_L = \Delta t (\sin(0) + \sin(0.5) + \sin(1) + \sin(1.5) + \sin(2) + \sin(2.5) + \sin(3) + \sin(3.5)) \].Calculate each sine value, sum them, and multiply by 0.5 to find \( A_L \approx 1.468 \).
03

Compute Right Rectangles Approximation

For the right rectangles approximation, evaluate the function at the right endpoint of each subinterval: \( t = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 \). The approximation for the area is:\[ A_R = \Delta t (\sin(0.5) + \sin(1) + \sin(1.5) + \sin(2) + \sin(2.5) + \sin(3) + \sin(3.5) + \sin(4)) \].Calculate each sine value, sum them, and multiply by 0.5 to find \( A_R \approx 1.557 \).
04

Compute Midpoint Rectangles Approximation

For the midpoint rectangles approximation, evaluate the function at the midpoint of each subinterval: \( t = 0.25, 0.75, 1.25, 1.75, 2.25, 2.75, 3.25, 3.75 \). The approximation for the area is:\[ A_M = \Delta t (\sin(0.25) + \sin(0.75) + \sin(1.25) + \sin(1.75) + \sin(2.25) + \sin(2.75) + \sin(3.25) + \sin(3.75)) \].Calculate each sine value, sum them, and multiply by 0.5 to find \( A_M \approx 1.539 \).
05

Compare Approximations with Actual Area

The actual area is given as \( 1.653643621 \). Now, compare the computed approximations:- Left: \( 1.468 \)- Right: \( 1.557 \)- Midpoint: \( 1.539 \)The right approximation \( A_R \approx 1.557 \) is closest to the actual area.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding the Left Riemann Sum
The Left Riemann Sum is a method used in numerical integration to approximate the area under a curve. It involves summing up the areas of rectangles formed by using the left endpoints of subintervals within a given range.

For a function like \(s(t)=\sin(t)\) over the interval \([0, 4]\), we divide the interval into 8 equal parts. The width of each subinterval \( \Delta t \) is determined by dividing the total interval length by the number of rectangles, giving \( \Delta t = \frac{4}{8} = 0.5\). This means each rectangle spans a width of 0.5 along the x-axis.

**Calculating Left Riemann Sum:**
  • To approximate the area, calculate the value of \(s(t)\) at the left endpoint of each subinterval.
  • For example, the points for the left endpoints here are \(t = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,\) and \(3.5\).
  • Calculate \( \sin(t)\) at these points, add them together, and then multiply by \( \Delta t = 0.5\).
This gives an estimated area under the curve of approximately 1.468. The Left Riemann Sum can tend to underestimate the actual area if the function increases over the interval, as rectangles will sit below the curve.
Unpacking the Right Riemann Sum
The Right Riemann Sum provides another approach to estimating the area under a curve using rectangles. This method uses the function's values at the right endpoints of each subinterval. It is especially useful when the function decreases over the interval, as it might offer a closer approximation than the left sum.

In the same interval \([0, 4]\), divided into 8 parts, where each subinterval has a width \( \Delta t = 0.5\), the right endpoints will be \(t = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5,\) and \(4\).

**Calculating Right Riemann Sum:**
  • The area estimation involves calculating \(s(t)\) at each of the right endpoints.
  • Sum these values, and multiply by the width \( \Delta t = 0.5\).
  • This results in an estimated area of approximately 1.557.
By evaluating the function at right endpoints, the Right Riemann Sum can yield a more accurate estimate when the function is decreasing. In this exercise, it was particularly effective in providing the closest approximation to the actual area.
Understanding Midpoint Riemann Sum
The Midpoint Riemann Sum offers an alternative and often more accurate method to approximate the area under a curve by evaluating the function at the midpoint of each subinterval. This approach can balance overestimation and underestimation seen in the left and right sums.

For \(s(t)=\sin(t)\) from \(0\) to \(4\), with 8 subdivisions, we continue with \( \Delta t = 0.5\). The midpoints fall at \(t = 0.25, 0.75, 1.25, 1.75, 2.25, 2.75, 3.25,\) and \(3.75\).

**Calculating Midpoint Riemann Sum:**
  • Evaluate the function \(s(t)\) at these midpoint positions.
  • Add the calculated sine values, then multiply them by the subinterval width \( \Delta t = 0.5\).
  • This provides an estimated area that is approximately 1.539.
The Midpoint Riemann Sum is particularly favored for providing more accuracy without biasing towards either overestimation or underestimation, especially effective in intervals where the function has both increasing and decreasing aspects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\(\begin{array}{llll}\text { Newspaper } & \text { Circulation } & \text { The circulation } & \text { (as } & \text { of }\end{array}\) September 20 of each year) of daily English-language newspapers in the United States between 1986 and 2000 can be modeled as $$ n(x)=0.00792 x^{3}-0.32 x^{2}+3.457 x+51.588 $$ where \(x\) is the number of years since 1980 . (Source: Based on data from Statistical Abstract, 1995 and 2001\()\) a. What was the average newspaper circulation from 1986 through \(2000 ?\) b. In what year was the newspaper circulation closest to the average circulation from 1986 through \(2000 ?\)

For Activities 11 through \(14,\) Write the general antiderivative with units of measure. $$ p(t)=1.7 e^{0.03 t} \text { million people per year, } t \text { years since } 2007 $$

Blood Pressure Blood pressure varies for individuals throughout the course of a day, typically being lowest at night and highest from late morning to early afternoon. The estimated rate of change in diastolic blood pressure for a patient with untreated hypertension is shown in the table. a. Find a model for the data. b. Calculate the average rate of change in diastolic blood pressure from 8 A.M. to 8 P.M. Rate of Change of Diastolic Blood Pressure $$ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text { Time } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Rate of Change } \\ \text { (mmHg per hour) } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { 8 A.M. } & 3.0 \\ \hline 10 \text { A.M. } & 1.8 \\ \hline 12 \text { P.M. } & 0.7 \\ \hline 2 \text { P.M. } & -0.1 \\ \hline 4 \text { P.M. } & -0.7 \\ \hline 6 \text { P.M. } & -1.1 \\ \hline 8 \text { P.M. } & -1.3 \\ \hline 10 \text { P.M. } & -1.1 \\ \hline 12 \text { A.M. } & -0.7 \\ \hline 2 \text { A.M. } & 0.1 \\ \hline 4 \text { A.M. } & 0.8 \\ \hline 6 \text { A.M. } & 1.9 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ c. Assuming that diastolic blood pressure was \(95 \mathrm{~mm} \mathrm{Hg}\) at 12 P.M., calculate the average diastolic blood pressure between 8 A.M. and 8 P.M.

Snow Pack The rate of change of the snow pack in an area in the Northwest Territories in Canada can be modeled as \(s(t)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll}0.00241 t+0.0290 & \text { when } 0 \leq t \leq 70 \\ 1.011 t^{2}-147.971 t & \\ +5406.578 & \text { when } 72 \leq t \leq 76\end{array}\right.\) where \(s\) is measured in \(\mathrm{cm}\) per day and \(t\) is the number of days since April 1 . a. Evaluate \(\int_{0}^{70} s(t) d t\) and interpret the answer. b. Evaluate \(\int_{72}^{76} s(t) d t\) and interpret the answer. c. Explain why it is not possible to calculate the value of \(\int_{0}^{76} s(t) d t\)

For Activities 11 through \(14,\) Write the general antiderivative with units of measure. \(c(x)=\frac{0.8}{x}+0.38\left(0.01^{x}\right)\) dollars per unit squared, when \(x\) units are produced

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.