/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 1 Population of Northeast The tabl... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Population of Northeast The table gives the population in millions of the northeastern part of the United States for some selected early years. \(^{70}\) a. On the basis of the data given for the years \(1790-1890\), find the best- fitting exponential function using exponential regression. Determine the correlation coefficient. Graph. Using this model, estimate the population in \(1990 .\) b. Now find the best-fitting logistic curve. Graph. Using this model, estimate the population in \(1990 .\) Note that the actual population of the Northeast in 1990 was 50.8 million. $$ \begin{array}{|l|ccc|} \hline \text { Year } & 1790 & 1810 & 1830 \\ \hline \text { Population } & 2.0 & 3.5 & 5.5 \\ \hline \text { Year } & 1850 & 1870 & 1890 \\ \hline \text { Population } & 8.6 & 12.3 & 17.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
Use regression to fit data to exponential and logistic models, then estimate the 1990 population and compare with 50.8 million.

Step by step solution

01

Set Up Exponential Regression Model

To find the exponential regression model, we'll fit the data to a function of the form: \( P(t) = ab^t \), where \( P(t) \) is the population in year \( t \), \( a \) and \( b \) are constants. Use the years 1790, 1810, 1830, 1850, 1870, and 1890. These are our \( x \) values (converted to intervals from 1790), and the population numbers are our \( y \) values.
02

Perform Exponential Regression

Using a graphing calculator or statistical software, input the \( x \) values (time since 1790) and the corresponding \( y \) values (population). Perform exponential regression to find the best fit curve. This output will provide the values for \( a \) and \( b \) and the correlation coefficient \( r \).
03

Graph Exponential Function and Correlation

Plot the data points on a graph and draw the exponential curve from the regression calculation. Assess the fit by looking at the correlation coefficient \( r \); the closer \( r \) is to 1, the better the fit.
04

Estimate Population for 1990 Using Exponential Model

Using the exponential function obtained, substitute 1990 in terms of years from 1790 (i.e., 200) into the equation to estimate the population for 1990.
05

Set Up Logistic Regression Model

The logistic model is represented as: \[ P(t) = \frac{L}{1+e^{-k(t-t_0)}} \], where \( L \) is the carrying capacity, \( k \) is the growth rate, and \( t_0 \) is the midpoint year. Again use the year intervals and population data for the same six years.
06

Perform Logistic Regression

Using the same calculator or software, perform logistic regression with the data. This will give the best-fitting logistic curve parameters: \( L \), \( k \), and \( t_0 \).
07

Graph Logistic Function

Plot the logistic curve on the same axes as the data points to visually assess the fit of the logistic model. Compare it with the exponential graph.
08

Estimate Population for 1990 Using Logistic Model

Substitute 1990 in the logistic equation found in Step 6 to estimate the population for 1990.
09

Compare Estimates with Actual Population

Both models provide estimates for the 1990 population. Compare these estimates with the actual population of 50.8 million and discuss which model fits better based on these estimates.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logistic Regression
Logistic regression is a powerful statistical method often used for modeling growth patterns that eventually level off. This process is particularly insightful when examining scenarios like population growth, where unbounded exponential growth is unrealistic. A logistic function follows the equation: \[ P(t) = \frac{L}{1+e^{-k(t-t_0)}} \] where:
  • \( L \) is the carrying capacity or maximum population size the environment can sustain.
  • \( k \) represents the growth rate, which controls how fast the population approaches its carrying capacity.
  • \( t_0 \) is the year when the population reaches half of its carrying capacity, marking the inflection point of the curve.
Unlike linear regression, logistic regression accounts for constraints that may slow down growth. It is crucial for evaluating long-term trends since it assumes that growth will decelerate as resources become limited. By using a logistic model for the northeast population data, you can more accurately reflect real-world influences on growth, especially when comparing estimates against actual historical data, such as the 1990 northeast population.
Population Growth Modeling
Modeling population growth helps to understand how populations change over time, and it can be presented through different mathematical models. These models range from simple linear trends to more complex exponential and logistic regressions. These methods help predict future population numbers based on past observations.Exponential growth models, described by the equation \( P(t) = ab^t \), suggest that the population multiplies rapidly without bounds. However, this is not always feasible due to environmental limitations. The logistic growth model, by contrast, assumes that growth will eventually slow as resources such as space, food, and water become scarce.In the context of U.S. northeast population data, both exponential and logistic models are employed to explore different growth aspects:
  • The exponential regression indicates potential for unrestricted, rapid growth. It's useful for short-term projections.
  • The logistic regression, on the other hand, provides a more realistic pattern over longer time spans, where the growth rate slows as it reaches a sustainable limit.
These models are invaluable for urban planning, enabling planners to foresee future challenges and opportunities regarding infrastructure, resources, and services.
Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, often denoted as \( r \), is a statistical measure that describes the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. In the context of our population growth models, this coefficient helps determine how well the model fits the historical data.Its value ranges from -1 to 1:
  • If \( r \) is close to 1, it indicates a strong positive linear relationship, suggesting that as one variable increases, so does the other.
  • If \( r \) is close to -1, there is a strong negative linear relationship, meaning one variable decreases as the other increases.
  • A value near 0 suggests no linear relationship between the variables.
When performing exponential or logistic regression on the population data, the correlation coefficient provides a quantifiable sense of how well the curve matches the real figures. A higher \( r \) in this context means the model accurately represents the historical population trends, making it a trustworthy tool for predicting future growth. Understanding this statistic is essential when comparing the output of different regression models, as it assists in identifying the most suitable approach for forecasting.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Productivity Bernstein \({ }^{13}\) studied the correlation between productivity growth and gross national product (GNP) growth of six countries: France (F), Germany (G), Italy (I), Japan (J), the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US). Productivity is given as output per employeehour in manufacturing. The data they collected for the years \(1950-1977\) is given in the following table. \begin{tabular}{|c|cccccc|} \hline Country & US & UK & F & I & G & J \\ \hline\(x\) & 2.5 & 2.7 & 5.2 & 5.6 & 5.7 & 9.0 \\ \hline\(y\) & 3.5 & 2.3 & 4.9 & 4.9 & 5.7 & 8.5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} Here \(x\) is the productivity growth \((\%),\) and \(y\) is the GNP growth (\%). a. Determine the best-fitting line using least squares and the correlation coefficient. b. What does this model predict the GNP growth will be when the productivity growth is \(7 \% ?\) c. What does this model predict the productivity growth will be if the GNP growth is \(7 \% ?\)

Johnston \(^{44}\) reports on a study of 40 firms relating the output to average fixed costs. Instead of using their 40 pieces of data, we use just their array means in the following table. $$ \begin{array}{|l|llllllll|} \hline x & 50 & 160 & 250 & 400 & 650 & 875 & 1250 & 2000 \\ \hline y & 4.6 & 4 & 3.1 & 3.2 & 3.3 & 2 & 2.7 & 2.5 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Here \(x\) is output in millions of units, and \(y\) is average cost per unit of output (in millions). Use power regression to find the best-fitting power function to the data and the correlation coefficient. Graph.

uarez-Villa and Karlsson \(^{47}\) studied the relationship between the sales in Sweden's electronic industry and production costs (per unit value of product sales). Their data are presented in the following table. $$\begin{array}{|c|ccccc|}\hline x & 7 & 13 & 14 & 15 & 17 \\\\\hline y & 0.91 & 0.72 & 0.91 & 0.81 & 0.72 \\\\\hline x & 20 & 25 & 27 & 35 & 45 \\\\\hline y & 0.90 & 0.77 & 0.65 & 0.73 & 0.70 \\\\\hline x & 45 & 63 & 65 & 82 & \\\\\hline y & 0.78 & 0.82 & 0.92 & 0.96 & \\\\\hline\end{array}$$ Here \(x\) is product sales in millions of krona, and \(y\) is production costs per unit value of product sales. a. Use cubic regression to find the best-fitting cubic to the data and the correlation coefficient. Graph. b. Find the minimum production costs.

Productivity Petralia \({ }^{15}\) studied the correlation between investment as a percent of GNP and productivity growth of nine countries: Belgium (B), Canada (C), France (F), Germany (G), Italy (I), Japan (J), the Netherlands (N), the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US). Productivity is given as output per empoyee-hour in manufacturing. The data they collected for the years \(1960-1976\) is given in the following table. \begin{tabular}{|c|ccccc|} \hline Country & US & UK & B & I & C \\ \hline\(x\) & 14 & 17 & 20.5 & 21 & 21.5 \\ \hline\(y\) & 2.2 & 3.3 & 6.4 & 5.8 & 3.8 \\ \hline Country & \(\mathrm{F}\) & \(\mathrm{N}\) & \(\mathrm{G}\) & \(\mathrm{J}\) & \\\ \hline\(x\) & 22 & 24 & 25 & 32 & \\ \hline\(y\) & 5.7 & 6.3 & 5.8 & 9.0 & \\ \hline \end{tabular} Here \(x\) is investment as percent of GNP, and \(y\) is the productivity growth (\%). a. Determine the best-fitting line using least squares and the correlation coefficient. b. What does this model predict the productivity growth will be when investment is \(30 \%\) of GNP? c. What does this model predict investment as a percent of GNP will be if productivity growth is \(7 \% ?\)

Medicare Benefit Payments The following table gives the benefit payments for Medicare for selected years and can be found in Glassman. \({ }^{55}\) Payments are in billions of dollars. $$ \begin{array}{|l|cccccc|} \hline \text { Year } & 1970 & 1975 & 1980 & 1985 & 1990 & 1993 \\ \hline \text { Payments } & 7.0 & 15.5 & 35.6 & 70.5 & 108.7 & 150.4 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ On the basis of this data, find the best-fitting exponential function using exponential regression. Let \(x=0\) correspond to 1970. Graph. Use this model to estimate payments in 1997 .

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.