/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Both first partial derivatives o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Both first partial derivatives of the function \(f(x, y)\) are zero at the given points. Use the second-derivative test to determine the nature of \(f(x, y)\) at each of these points. If the second-derivative test is inconclusive, so state. $$ f(x, y)=y e^{x}-3 x-y+5 ;(0,3) $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
At (0, 3), the Hessian determinant is -1. Therefore, the function has a saddle point at (0, 3).

Step by step solution

01

- Find First Partial Derivatives

First, calculate the first partial derivatives of the function with respect to both variables. For the given function: $$f(x, y) = y e^{x} - 3x - y + 5$$ Compute \frac{∂f}{∂x} and \frac{∂f}{∂y}. \frac{∂f}{∂x} = y e^{x} - 3$$, \frac{∂f}{∂y} = e^{x} - 1.$$
02

- Evaluate First Partial Derivatives at the Given Point

Check if both first partial derivatives are zero at the point (0, 3). Substitute (0, 3) into the partial derivatives: $$\frac{∂f}{∂x}(0, 3) = 3 e^{0} - 3 = 3-3 = 0.$$ $$\frac{∂f}{∂y}(0, 3) = e^{0} - 1 = 1-1 = 0.$$ Both partial derivatives are zero at the given point.
03

- Compute Second Partial Derivatives

Find all second partial derivatives of f(x, y): $$\frac{∂^2 f}{∂x^2} = \frac{∂}{∂x}\bigg(y e^{x} - 3) = y e^{x},$$ $$ \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y^2} = \frac{∂}{∂y}(e^{x} - 1) = 0,$$ $$\frac{∂^2 f}{∂x ∂y} = \frac{∂}{∂y}\bigg(y e^{x} - 3) = e^{x},$$ $$ \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y ∂x} = \frac{∂}{∂x}(e^{x} - 1) = e^{x}.$$
04

- Evaluate Second Partial Derivatives at the Given Point

Substitute (0, 3) into the second partial derivatives: $$ \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x^2}(0, 3) = 3 e^{0} = 3,$$ $$\frac{∂^2 f}{∂y^2}(0, 3) = 0,$$$$ \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x ∂y}(0, 3) = e^{0} = 1,$$$$\frac{∂^2 f}{∂y ∂x}(0, 3) = e^{0} = 1.$$
05

- Apply the Second Derivative Test

Use the values of the second partial derivatives to form the Hessian matrix H and evaluate its determinant: $$ H = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x^2} & \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x ∂y} \ \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y ∂x} & \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y^2} green= \begin{bmatrix}3 & 1\ 1 & 0green.$$ The determinant of the Hessian matrix is: $$ D = (3)(0) - (1)(1) = -1.$$ Since the determinant is negative, the second-derivative test indicates that (0, 3) does not have a local maximum or minimum.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Partial Derivatives
To start with, partial derivatives are derivatives where we hold one of the variables constant. For a function of two variables, such as the given function \( f(x, y) = y e^{x} - 3x - y + 5 \), we compute the partial derivatives with respect to \(x\) and \(y\).

The partial derivative with respect to \( x \) of our function is calculated by treating \( y \) as a constant, giving us:
\( \frac{∂f}{∂x} = y e^{x} - 3 \).

For the partial derivative with respect to \( y \), we treat \( x \) as a constant, resulting in: \( \frac{∂f}{∂y} = e^{x} - 1 \).

Evaluating these at the point \((0, 3)\), we substitute \( x = 0 \) and \( y = 3 \) into the partial derivative equations:
\( \frac{∂f}{∂x}(0, 3) = 3 e^{0} - 3 = 0 \)
\( \frac{∂f}{∂y}(0, 3) = e^{0} - 1 = 0 \)

This tells us that both partial derivatives are zero at the point \((0, 3)\), which is our starting point for using the second-derivative test.
Hessian Matrix
The Hessian matrix is a square matrix of second-order partial derivatives of a scalar-valued function. For our function \(f(x, y)\), the Hessian matrix is particularly important in determining the concavity of the function.

To construct the Hessian matrix, we calculate the second partial derivatives:
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x^2} = y e^{x} \)
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y^2} = 0 \)
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x ∂y} = e^{x} \)
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y ∂x} = e^{x} \)


Evaluating these at the point \((0, 3)\):
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x^2}(0, 3) = 3 e^{0} = 3 \)
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y^2}(0, 3) = 0 \)
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂x ∂y}(0, 3) = e^{0} = 1 \)
  • \( \frac{∂^2 f}{∂y ∂x}(0, 3) = e^{0} = 1 \)


The Hessian matrix at this point is then:
\[ H = \begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ 1 & 0 \ \ end{bmatrix} \]

To determine the nature of the critical point, we calculate the determinant of the Hessian matrix:
\[ D = (3)(0) - (1)(1) = -1 \]
A negative determinant suggests that the point is neither a local maximum nor a minimum, but rather a saddle point.
Local Extrema
Local extrema refer to points where a function reaches a local maximum or minimum. Determining local extrema involves not only finding where the first partial derivatives are zero but also using the second-derivative test.

In our case, after finding that both \( \frac{∂f}{∂x} = 0 \) and \( \frac{∂f}{∂y} = 0 \) at \( (0, 3) \), we apply the second-derivative test. As the determinant of the Hessian matrix \( D \) is negative, we confirm that \( (0, 3) \) is a saddle point. This means that the function does not have a local maximum or minimum at this point. Instead, the function has both a local minimum and maximum behavior in different directions around \( (0, 3) \).

Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing the behavior of functions in multivariable calculus and can be very useful in optimization problems and in the study of surface behavior in higher dimensions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find all points \((x, y)\) where \(f(x, y)\) has a possible relative maximum or minimum. Then, use the second-derivative test to determine, if possible, the nature of \(f(x, y)\) at each of these points. If the second-derivative test is inconclusive, so state. $$ f(x, y)=x^{3}-y^{2}-3 x+4 y $$

Calculate the volumes over the following regions \(R\) bounded above by the graph of \(f(x, y)=x^{2}+y^{2}\). \(R\) is the region bounded by the lines \(x=0, x=1\) and the curves \(y=0\) and \(y=\sqrt[3]{x}\).

In the remaining exercise, use one or more of the three methods discussed in this section (partial derivatives, formulas, or graphing utilities) to obtain the formula for the least-squares line. Health Care Expenditures Table 4 gives the U.S. per capita health-care expenditures for the years \(2005-2009 .\) (Source: Health Care Financing Review.) $$ \begin{array}{cc} \text { TABLE 4 } & \text { U.S. Per Capita Health } & \\ & \text { Care Expenditures } & \\ \text { Years (after 2000) } & \text { Dollars } \\ \hline 5 & 6,259 \\ 6 & 7,073 \\ 7 & 7,437 \\ 8 & 7,720 \\ 9 & 7,960 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ (a) Find the least-squares line for these data. (b) Use the least-squares line to predict the per capita health care expenditures for the year 2012 . (c) Use the least-squares line to predict when per capita health care expenditures will reach \(\$ 10,000\).

Calculate the following iterated integrals. $$ \int_{0}^{1}\left(\int_{0}^{x} e^{x+y} d y\right) d x $$

The production function for a firm is \(f(x, y)=64 x^{3 / 4} y^{1 / 4}\), where \(x\) and \(y\) are the number of units of labor and capital utilized. Suppose that labor costs $$\$ 96$$ per unit and capital costs $$\$ 162$$ per unit and that the firm decides to produce 3456 units of goods. (a) Determine the amounts of labor and capital that should be utilized in order to minimize the cost. That is, find the values of \(x, y\) that minimize \(96 x+162 y\), subject to the constraint \(3456-64 x^{3 / 4} y^{1 / 4}=0\). (b) Find the value of \(\lambda\) at the optimal level of production. (c) Show that, at the optimal level of production, we have \(\frac{[\text { marginal productivity of labor }]}{[\text { marginal productivity of capital] }}\) $$ =\frac{[\text { unit price of labor }]}{[\text { unit price of capital }]} $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.