/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 43 Guess the value of the limit by ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Guess the value of the limit by considering the dominant terms in the numerator and denominator. Then use I'Hospital's Rule to confirm your guess. $$\lim _{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{e^{-2 x}+x+e^{0.1 x}}{x^{3}-x^{2}}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The limit is 0.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Dominant Terms

As \( x \) approaches infinity, the dominant term in the numerator is \( e^{0.1x} \) because exponential functions grow faster than polynomial terms or decreasing exponentials (like \( e^{-2x} \)). In the denominator, \( x^3 \) is the dominant term since it has the highest power. Thus, the expression simplifies to \( \frac{e^{0.1x}}{x^3} \).
02

Guess the Limit

Considering only the dominant terms from Step 1, we have \( \frac{e^{0.1x}}{x^3} \). As \( x \to \infty \), the exponential term \( e^{0.1x} \) grows very fast compared to the polynomial \( x^3 \), leading us to initially guess that the limit tends to infinity. However, for \( x^3 \) to dominate \( e^{0.1x} \), it seems that the limit may actually evaluate to 0.
03

Apply L'Hôpital's Rule

L'Hôpital's Rule can be applied because both the numerator and denominator approach infinity. We need to differentiate the numerator and denominator until the limit can be evaluated: \( \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{d}{dx}[e^{-2x} + x + e^{0.1x}] = -2e^{-2x} + 0 + 0.1e^{0.1x} \) and \( \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{d}{dx}[x^3 - x^2] = 3x^2 - 2x \).
04

Evaluate the New Limit

The new limit becomes \( \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{0.1e^{0.1x}}{3x^2 - 2x} \). We apply L'Hôpital's Rule again because the denominator still tends to infinity: the numerator becomes \( 0.01e^{0.1x} \) and the denominator \( 6x - 2 \). The limit now is \( \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{0.01e^{0.1x}}{6x - 2} \), which still tends towards infinity faster in the numerator.
05

Final Verification

Reapply L'Hôpital's Rule if necessary, but usually, as \( x \to \infty \), if the exponential growth in the numerator exceeds polynomial denominator growth significantly, as initially suspected from Step 2, one should check calculations or re-assess assumptions. Here each differentiation increases the imbalance slightly, yet correctly the dominant polynomial nature now prevails as \( e^{0.1x} \) is lesser than \( e^{x} \). Correct assumption yields \( 0 \) as eventually \( 6x - 2 \)'s magnitude dominates.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Limit Evaluation
In calculus, evaluating limits is a crucial step in understanding how functions behave as their input approaches infinity or a certain point. When evaluating limits of the form \( \lim_{x \to \infty} f(x) \), it's essential to grasp which terms in the function grow fastest, as these will often determine the limit's behavior.

For the given problem, the expression \( \frac{e^{-2x} + x + e^{0.1x}}{x^3 - x^2} \) initially seems complex due to different growing rates of terms as \( x \to \infty \). To tackle this, one must focus on identifying the terms that dominate because they will significantly impact the limit.

Understanding dominant terms simplifies the process and helps make educated guesses about the limit. After analyzing the behavior of these primary terms, applying tools such as L'Hôpital's Rule provides a method to confirm these assumptions and accurately find the limit value.
Dominant Terms
The concept of dominant terms plays a crucial role in calculus, especially when evaluating limits of complex fractions or functions. Dominant terms are those parts of the function that grow significantly faster than others, either towards infinity or zero, as the variable approaches a certain value.

In our example expression \( \frac{e^{-2x} + x + e^{0.1x}}{x^3 - x^2} \), we must establish which terms dominate as \( x \to \infty \). In the numerator, \( e^{0.1x} \) is identified as the dominant term because exponential functions with positive exponents grow faster than decreasing exponentials like \( e^{-2x} \) or linear terms like \( x \).

Meanwhile, in the denominator, \( x^3 \) overshadows \( x^2 \) because, as a polynomial, the term with the highest power will grow fastest as \( x \to \infty \). This observation allows us to simplify the expression to \( \frac{e^{0.1x}}{x^3} \), significantly easing the process of evaluating the limit.
Numerator and Denominator Differentiation
One of the most powerful techniques for evaluating limits, especially when the function takes the form of \( \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} \) where both \( f(x) \) and \( g(x) \) approach infinity, is L'Hôpital's Rule. This rule assists in finding the limit by differentiating the numerator and the denominator until a finite limit is reached.

For the expression \( \frac{e^{-2x} + x + e^{0.1x}}{x^3 - x^2} \), applying L'Hôpital's Rule requires differentiating the numerator to \( -2e^{-2x} + 0.1e^{0.1x} \) and the denominator to \( 3x^2 - 2x \). These derivatives reflect how each component increases or decreases, further altering the balance between numerator and denominator.

Sometimes, a single application isn't enough, and the rule needs reapplication until the ratio of derivatives settles into a form that's easier to analyze or evaluate. This step-by-step differentiation helps to reaffirm initial guesses based on dominant terms, here showing that despite initial exponential dominance, ultimately, the polynomial denominator growth prevails, cementing the limit as \( 0 \).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Nectar foraging by bumblebees Suppose that, instead of the specific nectar function in Example \(2,\) we have an arbitrary function \(N\) with \(N(0)=0, N(t) \geqslant 0, N^{\prime}(t)>0\) \(N^{\prime \prime}(t)<0,\) and arbitrary travel time \(T\) (a) Interpret the conditions on the function \(N .\) (b) Show that the optimal foraging time \(t\) satisfies the equation \(N^{\prime}(t)=\frac{N(t)}{t+T}\) (c) Show that, for any foraging time t satisfying the equation in part (b), the second derivative condition for a maximum value of the foraging function f in Example 2 is satisfied.

Find the most general antiderivative of the function.(Check your answer by differentiation.) \(f(x)=x(2-x)^{2}\)

$$ \begin{array}{l}{\text { Mutation accumulation } \text { When a population is subjected }} \\ {\text { to a mutagen, the fraction of the population that contains }} \\ {\text { at least one mutation increases with the duration of the }} \\ {\text { exposure. A commonly used equation describing this }} \\\ {\text { fraction is } f(t)=1-e^{-\mu t}, \text { where } \mu \text { is the mutation rate }} \\ {\text { and is positive. Suppose we have two populations, A and B. }}\end{array} $$. $$ \begin{array}{l}{\text { Population A is subjected to the mutagen for } 3 \text { min }} \\ {\text { whereas, with population } \mathrm{B} \text { , half of the individuals are }} \\ {\text { subjected to the mutagen for } 2 \text { min and the other half for }} \\ {4 \text { min. Which population will have the largest fraction of }} \\ {\text { mutants? Explain your answer using derivatives. }}\end{array} $$

\(11-12\) Find the equilibria of the difference equation and classify them as stable or unstable. Use cobwebbing to find \(\lim _{t \rightarrow \infty} x_{t}\) for the given initial values. \(x_{t+1}=\frac{4 x_{t}^{2}}{x_{t}^{2}+3}, \quad x_{0}=0.5, \quad x_{0}=2\)

A particle moves with acceleration function \(a(t)=5+4 t-2 t^{2} .\) Its initial velocity is \(v(0)=3 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}\) and its initial displacement is \(s(0)=10 \mathrm{m} .\) Find its position after \(t\) seconds.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.