/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 13 In a particular chi-square goodn... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In a particular chi-square goodness-of-fit test, there are four categories and 200 observations. Use the .05 significance level. a. How many degrees of freedom are there? b. What is the critical value of chi-square?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 3 degrees of freedom. b. Critical value is 7.815.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

In a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, we want to compare observed data with expected data to see if there are significant deviations. To solve the questions, determine the degrees of freedom and the critical chi-square value for a given significance level.
02

Calculate Degrees of Freedom

The degrees of freedom (df) for a chi-square test is calculated using the formula: \[ df = k - 1 \] where \( k \) is the number of categories. Here, \( k = 4 \). Thus, the degrees of freedom is \[ df = 4 - 1 = 3 \].
03

Determine the Critical Chi-Square Value

The critical value of chi-square for \( df = 3 \) and a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.05 \) can be found using a chi-square distribution table or calculator. The critical value is approximately 7.815.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Degrees of Freedom
When conducting a chi-square goodness-of-fit test, understanding the concept of degrees of freedom (df) is crucial. Degrees of freedom in statistical tests is a value that reflects how many categories or levels are independent and can vary. In simpler terms, it indicates the number of values that are free to change while keeping the totals constant.
In the context of a chi-square test, the formula to determine the degrees of freedom is:\[ df = k - 1 \]Here, \( k \) stands for the number of categories we are comparing in the test. For instance, if you have four categories, as in this exercise, the degrees of freedom would be:\[ df = 4 - 1 = 3 \]This calculation is straightforward yet essential. By subtracting 1 from the number of categories, we are essentially acknowledging that once we know the counts in each of the first three categories, the count in the fourth category is automatically fixed to maintain the total number of observations. Understanding this helps to interpret the variability and reliability of the test results.
Critical Value
The critical value in a chi-square test is a key element in determining whether the observed data significantly deviates from the expected data. It acts as a threshold or cutoff point for decision-making in hypothesis testing. Specifically, it helps us decide if we should reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
To find the critical value for a chi-square test, you need to know:
  • The degrees of freedom (df), which we've already calculated.
  • The significance level (\( \alpha \)), which represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.
Once you have these values, you can refer to a chi-square distribution table or use a calculator to determine the critical value. In our exercise, with \( df = 3 \) and a significance level of \( \alpha = 0.05 \), the critical value is approximately 7.815.
Thus, if the chi-square statistic calculated from the data is more than 7.815, we would reject the null hypothesis, indicating that there are statistically significant differences between the observed and expected frequencies.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \( \alpha \), is a critical part of hypothesis testing, including the chi-square goodness-of-fit test. It signifies the probability threshold for rejecting the null hypothesis—essentially, it's the risk you are willing to take of concluding that a difference exists when there is none (Type I error).
A common choice for the significance level in many tests is 0.05, which implies a 5% risk of wrongly rejecting the null hypothesis. However, the significance level can be adjusted based on the context. In scientific research, sometimes more stringent levels like 0.01 or even 0.001 are used, depending on how critical it is to avoid making false claims.
In the context of our example, using a significance level of 0.05 means we want to be 95% confident in our test results. If the calculated chi-square statistic exceeds the critical value corresponding to 0.05 significance, it indicates that it is unlikely that the observed deviations from expected values are due to random chance.
  • If the value is less than the critical value, we should not reject the null hypothesis.
  • If the value exceeds the critical value, it suggests that the observed differences are statistically significant.
Choosing the correct significance level is vital for balancing the risk of errors against the need for precision in data analysis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

GfK Research North America conducted identical surveys 5 years apart. One question asked of women was "Are most men basically kind, gentle, and thoughtful?" The earlier survey revealed that, of the 3,000 women surveyed, 2,010 said that they were. The later survey revealed 1,530 of the 3,000 women thought that men were kind, gentle, and thoughtful. At the .05 level, can we conclude that women think men are less kind, gentle, and thoughtful in the later survey compared with the earlier one?

According to a study by the American Pet Food Dealers Association, \(63 \%\) of U.S. households own pets. A report is being prepared for an editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle. As a part of the editorial, a random sample of 300 households showed 210 own pets. Do these data disagree with the Pet Food Dealers Association's data? Use a .05 level of significance.

Banner Mattress and Furniture Company wishes to study the number of credit applications received per day for the last 300 days. The sample information is reported below. To interpret, there were 50 days on which no credit applications were received, 77 days on which only one application was received, and so on. Would it be reasonable to conclude that the population distribution is Poisson with a mean of 2.0 ? Use the .05 significance level. (Hint: To find the expected frequencies, use the Poisson distribution with a mean of \(2.0 .\) Find the probability of exactly one success given a Poisson distribution with a mean of 2.0. Multiply this probability by 300 to find the expected frequency for the number of days on which there was exactly one application. Determine the expected frequency for the other days in a similar manner.)

For many years, TV executives used the guideline that \(30 \%\) of the audience were watching each of the traditional big three prime-time networks and \(10 \%\) were watching cable stations on a weekday night. A random sample of 500 viewers in the Tampa-St. Petersburg, Florida, area last Monday night showed that 165 homes were tuned in to the ABC affiliate, 140 to the CBS affiliate, and 125 to the \(\mathrm{NBC}\) affiliate, with the remainder viewing a cable station. At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that the guideline is still reasonable?

Tina Dennis is the comptroller for Meek Industries. She believes that the current cashflow problem at Meek is due to the slow collection of accounts receivable. She believes that more than \(60 \%\) of the accounts are more than 3 months in arrears. A random sample of 200 accounts showed that 140 were more than 3 months old. At the .01 significance level, can she conclude that more than \(60 \%\) of the accounts are in arrears for more than three months?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.