91Ó°ÊÓ

The z-test is a statistical procedure used to determine if there are significant differences between the means of a sample and a known value or between two samples. In the context of hypothesis testing, the z-test is particularly useful when the standard deviation is known and the sample size is sufficiently large.

For this exercise, the z-test helps verify if the mean weight of pineapple cans exceeds the claimed 16 ounces. By comparing this sample mean to the hypothesized population mean using a standard deviation presumed to be accurate, we can ascertain statistically rigorous conclusions.

To conduct a z-test, calculate the z-statistic using the formula:

• \( z = \frac{\bar{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}} \)

Here, \( \bar{x} \) is the sample mean, \( \mu \) is the population mean, \( \sigma \) is the population standard deviation, and \( n \) is the sample size. This quantifies how many standard deviations the sample mean is from the population mean.

The null hypothesis, often denoted as \( H_0 \), is a foundational concept in hypothesis testing. It represents a statement of no effect or no difference and is the hypothesis that researchers seek to test.

In the given exercise, the null hypothesis is that the mean weight of the comprehensive sample of pineapple cans is 16 ounces.

This hypothesis can be expressed as:

• \( H_0: \mu = 16 \)

The goal of hypothesis testing is to assess the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. By conducting a z-test, as seen in the exercise, you determine whether the sample mean significantly deviates from the hypothesized mean under the assumption that \( H_0 \) is right.

The alternative hypothesis, represented as \( H_1 \) or \( H_a \), is what the test aims to support. It suggests that there is an effect or a difference. In contrast to the null hypothesis, the alternative suggests a new truth.

For this problem, the alternative hypothesis states that the mean weight of pineapple cans is indeed greater than 16 ounces, which would indicate an overfilling issue.

Explicitly, the alternative hypothesis can be written as:

• \( H_1: \mu > 16 \)

This forms a directional or "greater than" test, seeking evidence to support the supplier's overfilling concern. The choice between null and alternative hypotheses is assessed through the statistical evidence from the z-test result.

The p-value is a vital metric in hypothesis testing. It quantifies the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as, or more extreme than, the one calculated from your sample data, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

A small p-value, typically less than the significance level (\( \alpha \)), suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, contributing strongly to the rejection of \( H_0 \).

In the exercise, the p-value derived from a z-value of 11.8 is notably low, as the z-value far exceeds typical critical values in standard normal distribution scenarios. Through this p-value, we conclude that there is substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the mean weight is indeed greater than 16 ounces.

To find a p-value for a specific z-value, statistical tables or software can be used. It complements the decision about rejecting or accepting the null hypothesis effectively.