/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 The Damon family owns a large gr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Damon family owns a large grape vineyard in western New York along Lake Erie. The grapevines must be sprayed at the beginning of the growing season to protect against various insects and diseases. Two new insecticides have just been marketed: Pernod 5 and Action. To test their effectiveness, three long rows were selected and sprayed with Pernod \(5,\) and three others were sprayed with Action. When the grapes ripened, 400 of the vines treated with Pernod 5 were checked for infestation. Likewise, a sample of 400 vines sprayed with Action were checked. The results are: At the .05 significance level, can we conclude that there is a difference in the proportion of vines infested using Pernod 5 as opposed to Action?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, there is a significant difference in infestation rates between Pernod 5 and Action.

Step by step solution

01

State the Hypotheses

We need to determine if there is a significant difference between the infestation rates of vines treated with Pernod 5 and those treated with Action. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) asserts that there is no difference in the proportions of infestation, represented mathematically as \(p_1 = p_2\). The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) claims that there is a difference \(p_1 eq p_2\), where \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) are the proportions of infested vines for Pernod 5 and Action, respectively.
02

Collect and Organize Data

From the 400 vines treated with Pernod 5, 88 were found to be infested, so \(x_1 = 88\) and \(n_1 = 400\). From the 400 vines treated with Action, 63 were infested, meaning \(x_2 = 63\) and \(n_2 = 400\).
03

Calculate Sample Proportions

The sample proportion for Pernod 5 is \(\hat{p}_1 = \frac{x_1}{n_1} = \frac{88}{400} = 0.22\). For Action, the sample proportion is \(\hat{p}_2 = \frac{x_2}{n_2} = \frac{63}{400} = 0.1575\).
04

Compute the Standard Error

The standard error (SE) for the difference between two proportions is calculated as follows: \\[ SE = \sqrt{ \hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) \left( \frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2} \right) } \]Here, \(\hat{p}\) is the pooled proportion, given by \(\hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{88 + 63}{800} = 0.17625\). Thus, \\[ SE = \sqrt{0.17625 \times (1 - 0.17625) \times \left( \frac{1}{400} + \frac{1}{400} \right)} \approx 0.0289 \]
05

Calculate the Z-value

The Z-value is calculated as:\\[ Z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} = \frac{0.22 - 0.1575}{0.0289} \approx 2.161 \]
06

Decision Making

Using a significance level of \(\alpha = 0.05\), we compare the calculated Z-value to the critical Z-value. For a two-tailed test, the critical Z-value is approximately \(\pm 1.96\). Since \(2.161 > 1.96\), we reject the null hypothesis \(H_0\).
07

Conclusion

There is statistically significant evidence at the 0.05 significance level to suggest that there is a difference in the proportion of vines infested between those sprayed with Pernod 5 and those sprayed with Action.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportions
Proportions play a critical role in hypothesis testing for comparing groups. In this exercise, we look at two groups of grapevines, each treated with a different insecticide. The exercise requires us to calculate the proportion of vines that were infested in each group. This is done to compare the effectiveness of the two treatments. A proportion is essentially a part of the whole, calculated by dividing the part by the whole. Here, we divide the number of infested vines by the total number of vines to find the proportions for each group.
  • Pernod 5 Group: The proportion of infested vines is calculated as \( \hat{p}_1 = \frac{88}{400} = 0.22 \).

  • Action Group: Similarly, for the Action treated vines, the proportion is \( \hat{p}_2 = \frac{63}{400} = 0.1575 \).

These values tell us that 22% of the vines treated with Pernod 5 were infested compared to 15.75% for those with Action. Calculating these proportions helps establish a basis for comparative analysis, which is foundational in hypothesis testing.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted as \( \alpha \), is a threshold set to determine the strength of the evidence needed to reject the null hypothesis. For this problem, the significance level is set at 0.05. The choice of 0.05 as the significance level is common in many scientific studies and gives a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none (Type I error).
  • Setting \( \alpha = 0.05 \) means that if the probability of observing our test statistic is less than 5% assuming the null hypothesis is true, we will reject the null hypothesis.

  • In essence, it provides a cut-off point for decision-making, minimizing the chances of wrong inference.

Using this significance level, we compare our calculated test statistic (in this case, a Z-value) with the critical value from the statistical distribution (normal distribution for Z-tests). If our statistic falls beyond the significance threshold, it indicates sufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.
Z-value
The Z-value, or Z-score, is a measure of how many standard deviations a data point is from the mean of your data set. In hypothesis testing, the Z-value helps to determine whether the result from comparing two proportions is statistically significant. For this exercise, the Z-value is calculated using the formula:\[ Z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} \]where \( \hat{p}_1 \) and \( \hat{p}_2 \) are the sample proportions, and SE is the standard error of the difference between two proportions.
  • In this instance, the Z-value is computed as \( \frac{0.22 - 0.1575}{0.0289} \approx 2.161 \).

  • This value tells us how much our observed difference deviates from what is expected under the null hypothesis of no difference.

For a significance level of 0.05 in a two-tailed test, a critical Z-value is approximately \( \pm 1.96 \). Since the calculated Z-value (2.161) is greater than 1.96, we reject the null hypothesis, suggesting a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A coffee manufacturer is interested in whether the mean daily consumption of regular-coffee drinkers is less than that of decaffeinated-coffee drinkers. Assume the population standard deviation for those drinking regular coffee is 1.20 cups per day and 1.36 cups per day for those drinking decaffeinated coffee. A random sample of 50 regular-coffee drinkers showed a mean of 4.35 cups per day. A sample of 40 decaffeinated-coffee drinkers showed a mean of 5.84 cups per day. Use the .01 significance level. Compute the \(p\) -value.

(a) state the decision rule, (b) compute the pooled estimate of the population variance, (c) compute the test statistic, (d) state your decision about the null hypothesis, and (e) estimate the \(p\) -value. The null and alternate hypotheses are: $$ \begin{array}{l} H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2} \\ H_{1}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2} \end{array} $$ A random sample of 15 observations from the first population revealed a sample mean of 350 and a sample standard deviation of \(12 .\) A random sample of 17 observations from the second population revealed a sample mean of 342 and a sample standard deviation of \(15 .\) At the .10 significance level, is there a difference in the population means?

As part of a study of corporate employees, the director of human resources for PNC, Inc., wants to compare the distance traveled to work by employees at its office in downtown Cincinnati with the distance for those in downtown Pittsburgh. A sample of 35 Cincinnati employees showed they travel a mean of 370 miles per month. A sample of 40 Pittsburgh employees showed they travel a mean of 380 miles per month. The population standard deviations for the Cincinnati and Pittsburgh employees are 30 and 26 miles, respectively. At the .05 significance level, is there a difference in the mean number of miles traveled per month between Cincinnati and Pittsburgh employees?

The Roper Organization conducted identical surveys 5 years apart. One question asked of women was "Are most men basically kind, gentle, and thoughtful?" The earlier survey revealed that, of the 3,000 women surveyed, 2,010 said that they were. The later revealed 1,530 of the 3,000 women surveyed thought that men were kind, gentle, and thoughtful. At the .05 level, can we conclude that women think men are less kind, gentle, and thoughtful in the later survey compared with the earlier one?

In a poll recently conducted at Iowa State University, 68 out of 98 male students and 45 out of 85 female students expressed "at least some support" for implementing an "exit strategy" from Iraq. Test at the .05 significance level the null hypothesis that the population proportions are equal against the two-tailed alternative.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.