/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 According to a study by the Amer... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

According to a study by the American Pet Food Dealers Association, 63 percent of U.S. households own pets. A report is being prepared for an editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle. As a part of the editorial a random sample of 300 households showed 210 own pets. Does this data disagree with the Pet Food Dealers Association data? Use a .05 level of significance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the data disagrees; the sample proportion of 70% significantly differs from the 63% reported.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

First, we need to define the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) will assert that the proportion of households owning pets according to the sample is equal to the proportion reported by the association, which is 63% or \(p_0 = 0.63\). The alternative hypothesis (\(H_a\)) will assert that these proportions are not equal, \(p eq p_0\).
02

Calculate the Test Statistic

The test statistic for proportions is computed using the formula \( z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}} \), where \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion, \(p_0\) is the population proportion, and \(n\) is the sample size. In this situation, \(\hat{p} = \frac{210}{300} = 0.70\), \(p_0 = 0.63\), and \(n = 300\). Substitute these values to find \(z\).
03

Determine the Critical Value and Compare

For a significance level of 0.05 in a two-tailed test, the critical z-values are \(\pm1.96\). Calculate the test statistic. If it falls outside of -1.96 to 1.96, we will reject the null hypothesis.
04

Conclusion

Calculate the test statistic: \(z = \frac{0.70 - 0.63}{\sqrt{\frac{0.63 \times 0.37}{300}}}\). This gives \(z \approx 2.61\). Since 2.61 is greater than 1.96, we reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance. This suggests that the sample data significantly disagrees with the proportion of U.S. households owning pets as given by the American Pet Food Dealers Association.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Test Statistic
The test statistic is a pivotal element in hypothesis testing. It is used to determine whether to reject the null hypothesis, thus guiding our decision-making process. In this scenario, we are dealing with proportions, specifically, examining the proportion of households owning pets. When calculating the test statistic for proportions, we use the following formula:
  • \( z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\sqrt{\frac{p_0(1-p_0)}{n}}} \)
Here,
  • \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion.
  • \(p_0\) is the population proportion as proposed by the null hypothesis.
  • \(n\) is the sample size.

In this exercise, the sample proportion (\(\hat{p}\)) is 0.70, obtained by dividing the number of households that own pets by the total sampled households (210/300). The assumed population proportion (\(p_0\)) is 0.63. By substituting these values into the formula, we compute the test statistic to be approximately 2.61. This statistic will later be used to assess the validity of the null hypothesis based on its comparison to critical values.
Significance Level
The significance level, commonly denoted as \(\alpha\), plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing. It represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Essentially, it sets the threshold for what is considered statistically significant. A typical significance level in many studies is 0.05, meaning there is a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is none. This level is a balance between being too lenient and too stringent.
In our example, a 0.05 significance level is used to evaluate the test. For a two-tailed test, this means we look for critical values at both ends of the distribution. Typically, for \(\alpha = 0.05\), the critical z-values are \(\pm1.96\). If the calculated test statistic falls beyond these, it indicates a significant difference, prompting the rejection of the null hypothesis. Thus, the significance level serves as our standard for making decisions based on the calculated test statistic, ensuring our findings are not mere flukes of chance.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) is a fundamental component of hypothesis testing, representing the default assumption that there is no effect or difference. It provides a statement that can be tested statistically, acting as the "status quo" that we challenge. In our example, the null hypothesis states that the proportion of pet-owning households in our sample equals the population proportion reported by the American Pet Food Dealers Association, specifically, 63%. This can be expressed as:
  • \(H_0: p = 0.63\)

The purpose of testing the null hypothesis is to evaluate whether any observed difference (such as the sample proportion being 0.70 instead of 0.63) is significant enough to suggest that \(H_0\)should be rejected. By determining the test statistic and comparing it to critical values, we can decide to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on statistical evidence. In this instance, because the test statistic leads us to reject \(H_0\), it suggests that the sample data significantly differs from the population proportion, indicating potential discrepancies with the established statistic from the association.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A recent article in USA Today reported that a job awaits only one in three new college graduates. The major reasons given were an overabundance of college graduates and a weak economy. A survey of 200 recent graduates from your school revealed that 80 students had jobs. At the .02 significance level, can we conclude that a larger proportion of students at your school have jobs?

The management of White Industries is considering a new method of assembling its golf cart. The present method requires 42.3 minutes, on the average, to assemble a cart. The mean assembly time for a random sample of 24 carts, using the new method, was 40.6 minutes, and the standard deviation of the sample was 2.7 minutes. Using the .10 level of significance, can we conclude that the assembly time using the new method is faster?

At the time she was hired as a server at the Grumney Family Restaurant, Beth Brigden was told, "You can average more than \(\$ 80\) a day in tips." Assume the standard deviation of the population distribution is 3.24 . Over the first 35 days she was employed at the restaurant, the mean daily amount of her tips was 84.85 . At the .01 significance level, can Ms. Brigden conclude that she is earning an average of more than 80 in tips?

A spark plug manufacturer claimed that its plugs have a mean life in excess of 22,100 miles. Assume the life of the spark plugs follows the normal distribution. A fleet owner purchased a large number of sets. A sample of 18 sets revealed that the mean life was 23,400 miles and the standard deviation was 1,500 miles. Is there enough evidence to substantiate the manufacturer's claim at the .05 significance level?

According to the local union president, the mean income of plumbers in the Salt Lake City area follows the normal probability distribution with a mean of \(\$ 45,000\) and a standard deviation of \(\$ 3,000 .\) A recent investigative reporter for KYAK TV found, for a sample of 120 plumbers, the mean income was \(\$ 45,500\). At the .10 significance level, is it reasonable to conclude that the mean income is not equal to \(\$ 45,000 ?\) Determine the \(p\) value.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.