/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 An electron emitter produces ele... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An electron emitter produces electron beams with changing kinetic energy that is uniformly distributed between 3 and 7 joules. Suppose that it is possible to adjust the upper limit of the kinetic energy (currently set to 7 joules). a. What is the mean kinetic energy? b. What is the variance of the kinetic energy? c. What is the probability that an electron beam has a kinetic energy of exactly 3.2 joules? d. What should be the upper limit so that the mean kinetic energy increases to 8 joules? e. What should be the upper limit so that the variance of kinetic energy decreases to 0.75 joules?

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. Mean is 5 J; b. Variance is 1.33 J. c. P(3.2 J) = 0; d. Upper limit is 13 J; e. Upper limit is 6 J.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Uniform Distribution

The problem involves a uniform distribution of kinetic energy between 3 and 7 joules. In a uniform distribution from \(a\) to \(b\), all outcomes are equally likely within this range.
02

Calculate the Mean of the Uniform Distribution

The mean \(\mu\) of a uniform distribution from \(a\) to \(b\) is given by \(\mu = \frac{a + b}{2}\). For \(a = 3\) and \(b = 7\), \(\mu = \frac{3 + 7}{2} = 5\) joules.
03

Calculate the Variance of the Uniform Distribution

The variance \(\sigma^2\) for a uniform distribution from \(a\) to \(b\) is calculated using \(\sigma^2 = \frac{(b-a)^2}{12}\). Here \(\sigma^2 = \frac{(7-3)^2}{12} = \frac{16}{12} = \frac{4}{3}\) joules.
04

Determine the Probability of Exact Value in a Continuous Uniform Distribution

In a continuous distribution like the uniform distribution, the probability of observing any single finite value (e.g., exactly 3.2 joules) is 0, since there are infinite possible values.
05

Solve for New Upper Limit for Increased Mean

To find the new upper limit \(b'\) for a desired mean \(\mu' = 8\), set up the equation \(\mu' = \frac{a + b'}{2}\). Solving \(8 = \frac{3 + b'}{2}\) gives \(b' = 13\).
06

Solve for New Upper Limit for Decreased Variance

To achieve a variance \(\sigma'^2 = 0.75\), solve \(0.75 = \frac{(b'' - 3)^2}{12}\). Rearranging gives \((b'' - 3)^2 = 9\) so \(b'' - 3 = 3\) or \(b'' - 3 = -3\), thus \(b'' = 6\) or \(b'' = 0\). The solution in line with the constraints is \(b'' = 6\) joules.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Mean Kinetic Energy
When dealing with a continuous uniform distribution, calculating the mean is a straightforward task. In our scenario, electrons emitted by an electron beam vary in kinetic energy between 3 and 7 joules. For any uniform distribution defined by a minimum value \(a\) and a maximum value \(b\), the mean kinetic energy \(\mu\) can be determined using the formula:
  • \( \mu = \frac{a + b}{2} \)
In this case, the values are \(a = 3\) joules and \(b = 7\) joules. Thus, the mean kinetic energy is calculated as \(\mu = \frac{3+7}{2} = 5\) joules. This calculation gives us the average kinetic energy that we would expect from the electron beams. Remember, for a uniform distribution, every value within the range is equally likely, leading to a straightforward mean calculation.
By understanding this concept, adjusting the upper limit (or maximum value \(b\)) can directly influence and alter the mean kinetic energy. For instance, if we were to increase the mean to 8 joules, we'd set up the equation for a new \(b\) to solve \(8 = \frac{3 + b}{2}\), finding \(b = 13\). This demonstrates how modifying the range affects the average kinetic energy estimate.
Variance of Kinetic Energy
Variance provides insight into the extent to which energy values deviate from the mean value in a continuous uniform distribution. It quantifies the spread of the kinetic energy values in the electron beam from the mean. The formula for variance \(\sigma^2\) within a uniform distribution from \(a\) to \(b\) is:
  • \(\sigma^2 = \frac{(b-a)^2}{12} \)
In our example, the variance is calculated as \(\sigma^2 = \frac{(7-3)^2}{12} = \frac{16}{12} = \frac{4}{3}\) joules. This result indicates the extent of variation in the kinetic energy from the mean. A larger variance would signify a greater spread of kinetic energy values, while a smaller variance indicates that the values are closer to the mean.
Interestingly, by adjusting the upper limit \(b\), as seen when asking for a variance of 0.75 joules, we used the variance formula to solve \(0.75 = \frac{(b'' - 3)^2}{12}\), ultimately finding \(b'' = 6\) joules. This adjustment scales the distribution, thereby modifying how kinetic energies are spread around the mean.
Continuous Uniform Distribution
The continuous uniform distribution is vital for understanding how kinetic energy of electron beams is distributed in a specific range. In this distribution, all outcomes in an interval from \(a\) to \(b\) are equally probable. When discussing kinetic energy, this means any value between the limits has the same chance of being selected.
In our exercise, we consider the energy range between 3 and 7 joules. For such a distribution:
  • The mean is easily calculated as \(\frac{a + b}{2}\).
  • The variance is calculated by \(\frac{(b-a)^2}{12}\).
A unique feature of continuous distributions, from the probability perspective, is that any individual value within the range, like exactly 3.2 joules, has a probability of zero. This occurs because there are infinitely many possible values in the continuous interval.
Understanding this distribution allows us to handle questions about modifying parameters like the upper limit for specific mean and variance goals. It also underlines the significance of ranges rather than specific values within continuous data, guiding engineers and physicists on how to adjust their instruments or settings for desired outcomes.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Patients arrive at a hospital emergency department according to a Poisson process with a mean of 6.5 per hour. a. What is the mean time until the 10th arrival? b. What is the probability that more than 20 minutes is required for the third arrival?

An article in Microelectronics Reliability ["Advanced Electronic Prognostics through System Telemetry and Pattern Recognition Methods" \((2007,\) Vol. \(47(12),\) pp. \(1865-1873)]\) presented an example of electronic prognosis. The objective was to detect faults to decrease the system downtime and the number of unplanned repairs in high-reliability systems. Previous measurements of the power supply indicated that the signal is normally distributed with a mean of \(1.5 \mathrm{~V}\) and a standard deviation of \(0.02 \mathrm{~V}\) a. Suppose that lower and upper limits of the predetermined specifications are \(1.45 \mathrm{~V}\) and \(1.55 \mathrm{~V},\) respectively. What is the probability that a signal is within these specifications? b. What is the signal value that is exceeded with \(95 \%\) probability? c. What is the probability that a signal value exceeds the mean by two or more standard deviations?

In an accelerator center, an experiment needs a \(1.41-\mathrm{cm}-\) thick aluminum cylinder (http://puhepl.princeton.edu/mumu' target/Solenoid_Coil.pdf). Suppose that the thickness of a cylinder has a normal distribution with a mean of \(1.41 \mathrm{~cm}\) and a standard deviation of \(0.01 \mathrm{~cm} .\) a. What is the probability that a thickness is greater than \(1.42 \mathrm{~cm} ?\) b. What thickness is exceeded by \(95 \%\) of the samples? c. If the specifications require that the thickness is between \(1.39 \mathrm{~cm}\) and \(1.43 \mathrm{~cm}\), what proportion of the samples meets specifications?

Suppose that the length of stay (in hours) at a hospital emergency department is modeled with a lognormal random variable \(X\) with \(\theta=1.5\) and \(\omega=0.4 .\) Determine the following in parts (a) and (b): a. Mean and variance b. \(P(X<8)\) c. Comment on the difference between the probability \(P(X<0)\) calculated from this lognormal distribution and a normal distribution with the same mean and variance.

Given the probability density function \(f(x)=\) \(0.01^{3} x^{2} e^{-0.01 x} / \Gamma(3),\) determine the mean and variance of the distribution.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.