/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 105 Construct a \(2^{5-1}\) design. ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Construct a \(2^{5-1}\) design. Suppose that it is necessary to run this design in two blocks of eight runs each. Show how this can be done by confounding a two-factor interaction (and its aliased three-factor interaction) with blocks.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Select two-factor interaction AB to confound with blocks. Use ABCD=E, confounding AB=CD and ABCD=E in two eight-run blocks.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We need to construct a fractional factorial design, specifically a \(2^{5-1}\) design. This means we have 4 factors (since \(5-1=4\)) and we need two blocks with 8 runs each. The confounding should involve a two-factor interaction aliased with a three-factor interaction.
02

Identify the Variables

Identify the main factors A, B, C, D, and E. Since we're doing a \(2^{5-1}\) design, choose E as the interaction of the first four factors. So, \(E = ABCD\).
03

Choose Confounding Structure

To split into two blocks, select a two-factor interaction, say \(AB\), to confound with the blocks. Consequently, the interactions \(AB=CD\) and \(ABCD=E\) are also aliased, as they combine to give these blocks.
04

Build Aliases

Based on the chosen confounding factor, develop the alias structure: \(I = AB*CD\), meaning each block contrast is confounded with \(ABCD\). This causes the two blocks to contain observations where \(AB = +1\) and \(AB = -1\).
05

Design Arrangements for Blocks

Arranging the data for each block involves half of the interaction level consistent conditions for each block. Generate block 1 with other factors at a high (+1) level and block 2 with these factors at a low (-1) level.
06

Run the Experiment

Conduct the experiment in two blocks. Each block has 8 runs corresponding to different combinations of the high and low levels for the four factors A, B, C, D, given the interactions picked.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confounding
Confounding in fractional factorial designs refers to the intentional merging of different effects into the same estimation group, making it impossible to separate them based solely on the experimental data. This is often done to create more manageable experiments when resources are limited.

In a fractional factorial design, certain interactions are deliberately confounded with what are known as blocks, which are groups of experimental runs. In the provided exercise, the confounding is clear, as a two-factor interaction is chosen to split the design into blocks: the interaction between factors A and B.
  • This means the effect of the interaction AB is confounded with the differences between the two blocks.
  • Blocking allows us to consider environmental or background variations, while still providing insight into the other interactions, albeit within the limits of confounding.
This systematic approach helps minimize variables like day-to-day variability, soil differences, or even different batches of material, thereby increasing the experiment's reliability.
Two-Factor Interaction
Two-factor interactions occur when the effect of one factor on the outcome varies depending on the level of another factor. Simply put, the impact of feature A might be different at high levels of feature B compared to its low levels.

For example, in our exercise's setup, the interaction of A and B gets special attention. When two factors like A and B interact, their combined effect could be non-additive, meaning the total effect is not just the sum of their separate effects.

In the context of blocking and confounding:
  • The two-factor interaction, such as AB, is often confounded with a block to streamline the factorial design.
  • This can be advantageous in strong interactions that drastically change the result, though it requires smart planning when choosing which interactions to confound.
Such interactions are vital to understanding as they can drive context-based changes in the outcomes of experiments and help reveal deeper insights into complex processes.
Blocking
Blocking is a technique used in experimental design to divide the experiment into groups known as blocks. This is done to control for variances that could cloud the results of an experiment.

When we divide our experiment into blocks, like in the original exercise, we attempt to control external factors that might influence the responses. Here, blocking helps us manage unexpected variability by separating influences that cannot be eliminated by randomization alone.
  • In the exercise, the design is split into two blocks using factor interaction E = ABCD as a confounding factor.
  • This allows the two runs in each block to account for potential background effects that are external to the factors A, B, C, and D.
Blocking is particularly useful when there might be systematic differences between blocks such as time sequence, day of experiment, or different lab equipment settings.
Aliased Interactions
Aliased interactions in a fractional factorial design are when certain effects look alike because they are confounded with each other. Simply, their combined effects are indistinguishable from one another in the data output.

In the context of our exercise, when we select a two-factor interaction like AB to be confounded with blocks, other interactions such as AB = CD and the three-factor interaction ABCD become aliased. This means that any observed effects could be due to either interaction or a combination of them.
  • Such aliasing implies explicit decisions in the choosing of what can be investigated separately versus what must remain hidden within block contrasts.
  • Aliasing leads to a trade-off between the number of factors and runs, ensuring experiment size stays feasible.
Understanding aliased interactions is essential to interpreting the results accurately, ensuring you know which combinations are masquerading as primary effects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Four factors are thought to influence the taste of a soft-drink beverage: type of sweetener \((A),\) ratio of syrup to water \((B),\) carbonation level \((C),\) and temperature \((D) .\) Each factor can be run at two levels, producing a \(2^{4}\) design. At each run in the design, samples of the beverage are given to a test panel consisting of 20 people. Each tester assigns the beverage a point score from 1 to \(10 .\) Total score is the response variable, and the objective is to find a formulation that maximizes total score. Two replicates of this design are run, and the results are shown in the table. Analyze the data and draw conclusions. Use \(a=0.05\) in the statistical tests. $$ \begin{array}{ccc} \hline \ {\begin{array}{c} \text { Treatment } \\ \text { Combination } \end{array}} & {\text { Replicate }} \\ \ & \text { I } & \text { II } \\ \hline(1) & 159 & 163 \\ a & 168 & 175 \\ b & 158 & 163 \\ a b & 166 & 168 \\ c & 175 & 178 \\ a c & 179 & 183 \\ b c & 173 & 168 \\ a b c & 179 & 182 \\ d & 164 & 159 \\ a d & 187 & 189 \\ b d & 163 & 159 \\ a b d & 185 & 191 \\ c d & 168 & 174 \\ a c d & 197 & 199 \\ b c d & 170 & 174 \\ a b c d & 194 & 198 \end{array} $$

Consider the following results from a two-factor experiment with two levels for factor \(A\) and three levels for factor \(B\). Each treatment has three replicates. $$ \begin{array}{llrc} \hline A & B & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 21.33333 & 6.027714 \\ 1 & 2 & 20 & 7.549834 \\ 1 & 3 & 32.66667 & 3.511885 \\ 2 & 1 & 31 & 6.244998 \\ 2 & 2 & 33 & 6.557439 \\ 2 & 3 & 23 & 10 \end{array} $$ (a) Calculate the sum of squares for each factor and the interaction. (b) Calculate the sum of squares total and error. (c) Complete an ANOVA table with \(F\) -statistics.

An article in Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology ["A Study of Antifungal Antibiotic Production by Thermomonospora sp MTCC 3340 Using Full Factorial Design" (2003, Vol. 78, pp. \(605-610\) ) ] considered the effects of several factors on antifungal activities. The antifungal yield was expressed as Nystatin international units per \(\mathrm{cm}^{3}\). The results from carbon source concentration (glucose) and incubation temperature factors follow. See Table E14-1. (a) State the hypotheses of interest. (b) Test your hypotheses with \(\alpha=0.5\). (c) Analyze the residuals and plot the residuals versus the predicted yield. (d) Using Fisher's LSD method, compare the means of anti-fungal activity for the different carbon source concentrations. (Table)

Construct a \(2^{5}\) design in two blocks. Select the \(A B C D E\) interaction to be confounded with blocks.

An experiment described by M. G. Natrella in the National Bureau of Standards' Handbook of Experimental Statistics \((1963,\) No. 91\()\) involves flame-testing fabrics after applying fire-retardant treatments. The four factors considered are type of fabric \((A),\) type of fire-retardant treatment \((B),\) laundering condition \((C-\) the low level is no laundering, the high level is after one laundering), and method of conducting the flame test \((D)\). All factors are run at two levels, and the response variable is the inches of fabric burned on a standard size test sample. The data are: \(\begin{array}{llll}(1) & =42 & d & =40 \\ a & =31 & a d & =30 \\ b & =45 & b d & =50 \\ a b & =29 & a b d & =25 \\ c & =39 & c d & =40\end{array}\) \(\begin{array}{ll}a c=28 & a c d=25 \\ b c=46 & b c d=50 \\ a b c=32 & a b c d=23\end{array}\) (a) Estimate the effects and prepare a normal plot of the effects. (b) Construct an analysis of variance table based on the model tentatively identified in part (a). (c) Construct a normal probability plot of the residuals and comment on the results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.