/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 120 Consider a multiple regression m... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider a multiple regression model with \(k\) regressors. Show that the test statistic for significance of regression can be written as $$ F_{0}=\frac{R^{2} / k}{\left(1-R^{2}\right) /(n-k-1)} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The F-statistic for significance in regression is \( F_0 = \frac{R^2 / k}{(1-R^2) / (n-k-1)} \).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Hypotheses Tested

In multiple regression, the significance of regression is tested by examining the null hypothesis \[ H_0: \beta_1 = \beta_2 = \dots = \beta_k = 0 \]against the alternative hypothesis \[ H_A: \text{at least one } \beta_i eq 0 \].This implies that none of the independent variables explain the variability of the dependent variable under the null hypothesis.
02

Recognize the Form of the F-statistic

The F-statistic used to test the significance of the regression is given by:\[ F_0 = \frac{MSR}{MSE} \]where \( MSR \) is the mean square regression, calculated by dividing the regression sum of squares (\( SSR \)) by \( k \), and \( MSE \) is the mean square error, calculated by dividing the error sum of squares (\( SSE \)) by \( (n - k - 1) \).
03

Express Relationship Using R-squared (R²)

The coefficient of determination \( R^2 \) is defined as:\[ R^2 = \frac{SSR}{SST} \]where \( SST \) is the total sum of squares, such that \( SST = SSR + SSE \). In terms of \( SSR \) and \( SSE \), this can be rearranged to show:\[ SSR = R^2 \times SST \quad \text{and} \quad SSE = (1 - R^2) \times SST \]
04

Simplify F-statistic Using R²

Substitute \( SSR = R^2 \times SST \) and \( SSE = (1 - R^2) \times SST \) into the components of the F-statistic:\[F_0 = \frac{\frac{R^2 \times SST}{k}}{\frac{(1 - R^2) \times SST}{(n - k - 1)}}\]Simplifying the expression, \((\text{as SST cancels out})\):\[F_0 = \frac{R^2 / k}{(1-R^2) / (n-k-1)}\]This demonstrates the required expression for the F-statistic.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Significance of Regression
When dealing with multiple regression, it's crucial to assess whether the model as a whole provides useful information about the relationship being studied. This is where the significance of regression comes in. It helps us determine whether we have enough statistical evidence to say that some or all of our independent variables are impactful.

Imagine you're trying to predict a plant's growth based on sunlight and water. The significance tests if both, either, or none of these factors actually affect growth. To do this, we start with a null hypothesis, which assumes none of these variables affect the dependent variable.

In mathematical terms, the null hypothesis in multiple regression is \( H_0: \beta_1 = \beta_2 = \dots = \beta_k = 0 \).

If we can reject this null hypothesis, it suggests that at least one independent variable has a genuine association with the dependent variable.
F-statistic
The F-statistic is a vital tool in multiple regression analysis. It helps us test the overall significance of the regression model.

In simple terms, the F-statistic compares the explained and unexplained variability in the dataset. It's given by the formula:\[ F_0 = \frac{MSR}{MSE} \]Here, \( MSR \) (Mean Square Regression) measures the variance explained by the regression, while \( MSE \) (Mean Square Error) measures the variance left unexplained. By comparing these, the F-statistic assesses whether the observed relationship is statistically significant.

If \( F_0 \) is large, it suggests that the model explains a significant portion of the variability, and the null hypothesis can be rejected. If it's small, it indicates the model might not provide a significant explanation.
Coefficient of Determination (R-squared)
The coefficient of determination, often denoted as \( R^2 \), is a key metric in regression analysis. It indicates how well our regression line fits the data.

Mathematically, \( R^2 \) is defined as:\[ R^2 = \frac{SSR}{SST} \]Where \( SSR \) is the regression sum of squares, and \( SST \) is the total sum of squares.

In layman's terms, \( R^2 \) tells us the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the independent variables in the model.
  • A higher \( R^2 \) value means a better fit, indicating the model explains a significant portion of the variability.
  • A lower \( R^2 \) suggests that many other factors not included in the model may be influencing the dependent variable.
Null Hypothesis
In the context of regression analysis, the null hypothesis is a starting assumption that denotes no effect or relationship.

For multiple regression, the null hypothesis is written as \( H_0: \beta_1 = \beta_2 = \dots = \beta_k = 0 \). This implies that none of the independent variables in our model influence the dependent variable.

The purpose of forming and testing the null hypothesis is to challenge the status quo. We use statistical tests to see if the evidence is strong enough to reject this hypothesis. If the hypothesis is rejected, it suggests that at least one of the independent variables has a significant influence.
Testing the null hypothesis helps in making data-driven decisions, ensuring that the conclusions drawn from the regression analysis are valid and reliable.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in the Journal of the American Ceramics Society (1992, Vol. 75, pp. 112-116) described a process for immobilizing chemical or nuclear wastes in soil by dissolving the contaminated soil into a glass block. (a) For the six-regressor model, suppose that \(S S_{T}=0.50\) and \(R^{2}=0.94 .\) Find \(S S_{E}\) and \(S S_{R},\) and use this information to test for significance of regression with \(\alpha=0.05 .\) What are your conclusions? (b) Suppose that one of the original regressors is deleted from the model, resulting in \(R^{2}=0.92 .\) What can you conclude about the contribution of the variable that was removed? Answer this question by calculating an \(F\) -statistic. (c) Does deletion of the regressor variable in part (b) result in a smaller value of \(M S_{E}\) for the five-variable model, in comparison to the original six-variable model? Comment on the significance of your answer.

The pull strength of a wire bond is an important characteristic. Table \(\mathrm{E} 12-4\) gives information on pull strength \((y)\) die height \(\left(x_{1}\right),\) post height \(\left(x_{2}\right),\) loop height \(\left(x_{3}\right),\) wire length \(\left(x_{4}\right),\) bond width on the die \(\left(x_{5}\right),\) and bond width on the post \(\left(x_{6}\right)\) (a) Fit a multiple linear regression model using \(x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4},\) and \(x_{5}\) as the regressors (b) Estimate \(\sigma^{2}\). (c) Find the \(\operatorname{se}\left(\hat{\boldsymbol{\beta}}_{j}\right) .\) How precisely are the regression coefficients estimated in your opinion? (d) Use the model from part (a) to predict pull strength when \(x_{2}=20, x_{3}=30, x_{4}=90,\) and \(x_{5}=2.0 .\) $$ \begin{array}{rcccccc} \hline y & x_{1} & x_{2} & x_{3} & x_{4} & x_{5} & x_{6} \\ \hline 8.0 & 5.2 & 19.6 & 29.6 & 94.9 & 2.1 & 2.3 \\ 8.3 & 5.2 & 19.8 & 32.4 & 89.7 & 2.1 & 1.8 \\ 8.5 & 5.8 & 19.6 & 31.0 & 96.2 & 2.0 & 2.0 \\ 8.8 & 6.4 & 19.4 & 32.4 & 95.6 & 2.2 & 2.1 \\ 9.0 & 5.8 & 18.6 & 28.6 & 86.5 & 2.0 & 1.8 \\ 9.3 & 5.2 & 18.8 & 30.6 & 84.5 & 2.1 & 2.1 \\ 9.3 & 5.6 & 20.4 & 32.4 & 88.8 & 2.2 & 1.9 \\ 9.5 & 6.0 & 19.0 & 32.6 & 85.7 & 2.1 & 1.9 \\ 9.8 & 5.2 & 20.8 & 32.2 & 93.6 & 2.3 & 2.1 \\ 10.0 & 5.8 & 19.9 & 31.8 & 86.0 & 2.1 & 1.8 \\ 10.3 & 6.4 & 18.0 & 32.6 & 87.1 & 2.0 & 1.6 \\ 10.5 & 6.0 & 20.6 & 33.4 & 93.1 & 2.1 & 2.1 \\ 10.8 & 6.2 & 20.2 & 31.8 & 83.4 & 2.2 & 2.1 \\ 11.0 & 6.2 & 20.2 & 32.4 & 94.5 & 2.1 & 1.9 \\ 11.3 & 6.2 & 19.2 & 31.4 & 83.4 & 1.9 & 1.8 \\ 11.5 & 5.6 & 17.0 & 33.2 & 85.2 & 2.1 & 2.1 \\ 11.8 & 6.0 & 19.8 & 35.4 & 84.1 & 2.0 & 1.8 \\ 12.3 & 5.8 & 18.8 & 34.0 & 86.9 & 2.1 & 1.8 \\ 12.5 & 5.6 & 18.6 & 34.2 & 83.0 & 1.9 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

You have fit a multiple linear regression model and the \(\left(\mathbf{X}^{\prime} \mathbf{X}\right)^{-1}\) matrix is: $$ \left(\mathbf{X}^{\prime} \mathbf{X}\right)^{-1}=\left[\begin{array}{rrr} 0.893758 & -0.0282448 & -0.0175641 \\ -0.028245 & 0.0013329 & 0.0001547 \\ -0.017564 & 0.0001547 & 0.0009108 \end{array}\right] $$ (a) How many regressor variables are in this model? (b) If the error sum of squares is 307 and there are 15 observations, what is the estimate of \(\sigma^{2}\) ? (c) What is the standard error of the regression coefficient \(\hat{\beta}_{1} ?\)

A study was performed on wear of a bearing and its relationship to \(x_{1}=\) oil viscosity and \(x_{2}=\) load. The following data were obtained $$ \begin{array}{rrr} \hline y & x_{1} & x_{2} \\ \hline 293 & 1.6 & 851 \\ 230 & 15.5 & 816 \\ 172 & 22.0 & 1058 \\ 91 & 43.0 & 1201 \\ 113 & 33.0 & 1357 \\ 125 & 40.0 & 1115 \end{array} $$ (a) Fit a multiple linear regression model to these data. (b) Estimate \(\sigma^{2}\) and the standard errors of the regression coefficients. (c) Use the model to predict wear when \(x_{1}=25\) and \(x_{2}=1000\). (d) Fit a multiple linear regression model with an interaction term to these data. (e) Estimate \(\sigma^{2}\) and \(\operatorname{se}\left(\hat{\beta}_{j}\right)\) for this new model. How did these quantities change? Does this tell you anything about the value of adding the interaction term to the model? (f) Use the model in part (d) to predict when \(x_{1}=25\) and \(x_{2}=1000 .\) Compare this prediction with the predicted value from part (c).

A regression model is to be developed for predicting the ability of soil to absorb chemical contaminants. Ten observations have been taken on a soil absorption index \((y)\) and two regressors: \(x_{1}=\) amount of extractable iron ore and \(x_{2}=\) amount of bauxite. We wish to fit the model \(y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}+\epsilon\). Some necessary quantities are: $$ \begin{aligned} \left(\mathbf{X}^{\prime} \mathbf{X}\right)^{-1} &=\left[\begin{array}{lll} 1.17991 & -7.30982 \mathrm{E}-3 & 7.3006 \mathrm{E}-4 \\ -7.30982 \mathrm{E}-3 & 7.9799 \mathrm{E}-5 & -1.23713 \mathrm{E}-4 \\ 7.3006 \mathrm{E}-4 & -1.23713 \mathrm{E}-4 & 4.6576 \mathrm{E}-4 \end{array}\right] \\ \mathbf{X}^{\prime} \mathbf{y} &=\left[\begin{array}{r} 220 \\ 36,768 \\ 9,965 \end{array}\right] \end{aligned} $$ (a) Estimate the regression coefficients in the model specified. (b) What is the predicted value of the absorption index \(y\) when \(x_{1}=200\) and \(x_{2}=50 ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.