Chapter 11: Problem 77
Suppose that data are obtained from 20 pairs of \((x, y)\) and the sample correlation coefficient is \(0.75 .\) (a) Test the hypothesis that \(H_{0}: \rho=0\) against \(H_{1}: \rho>0\) with \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Calculate the \(P\) -value. (b) Test the hypothesis that \(H_{1}: \rho=0.5\) against \(H_{1}: \rho>0.5\) with \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Calculate the \(P\) -value. (c) Construct a \(95 \%\) one-sided confidence interval for the correlation coefficient. Explain how the questions in parts (a) and (b) could be answered with a confidence interval.
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Identify the Hypothesis for Part (a)
Compute the Test Statistic for Part (a)
Determine the Critical Value and P-value for Part (a)
Decision for Part (a)
Identify the Hypothesis for Part (b)
Transform Correlation Coefficients Using Fisher's z-transformation
Compute the z-Statistic for Part (b)
Determine the Critical Value and P-value for Part (b)
Decision for Part (b)
Construct One-Sided Confidence Interval for Part (c)
Interpret the Confidence Interval Result for Part (c)
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Hypothesis Testing
For instance, in Part (a) of the original problem, the hypotheses were:
- \( H_0: \rho = 0 \) - suggesting no correlation in the population.
- \( H_1: \rho > 0 \) - indicating a positive correlation is present.
In Part (b), the null hypothesis is adjusted to \( \rho = 0.5 \), showing how hypotheses can be tailored to specific research questions, allowing for more nuanced conclusions about the strength and direction of a correlation.
P-value Calculation
In Part (a), after deriving the test statistic (\( t = 4.472 \)) based on the sample correlation, the P-value is calculated. For the given statistic with 18 degrees of freedom, the P-value is less than the significance level \( \alpha = 0.05 \). This led to the rejection of the null hypothesis, concluding that there is a statistically significant positive correlation.
Similarly, in Part (b), the transformation to a z-statistic provided a value where the P-value was again less than \( 0.05 \), reinforcing the hypothesis that \( \rho > 0.5 \). When a P-value is low, typically less than 0.05, it suggests that the observed data is unlikely under the null hypothesis, supporting the case for the alternative.
Fisher's z-transformation
To apply Fisher's z-transformation, convert the sample correlation coefficient \( r \) and any hypothesized \( \rho \) value using the formula: \[ z = \frac{1}{2} \ln\left(\frac{1+r}{1-r}\right) \]In the exercise, the transformation was applied to calculate \( z \) values for \( r = 0.75 \) and \( 0.5 \), resulting in values \( 0.9724 \) and \( 0.5493 \) respectively.
This transformation is especially useful in Part (b). After obtaining z-scores, you can compute the z-statistic using:\[ z = \frac{z_{r} - z_{0.5}}{1/\sqrt{n-3}} \]The z-statistic assists in determining how far sample data deviates from what is expected under the null hypothesis, offering a clear path to P-value calculation and inference without the assumptions required for the raw correlation coefficient.
Confidence Interval
In this exercise, a 95% one-sided confidence interval is constructed for the correlation coefficient \( \rho \). By evaluating the transformed z-values and incorporating the critical z-value (e.g., \( 1.645 \) for 95% confidence), the interval: \[ z_{r} \pm z_{\alpha} \times \frac{1}{\sqrt{n-3}} \]is formed, then back-transformed to reflect the correlation scale.
This interval gives a lower bound for \( \rho \), indicating values that \( \rho \) is likely to exceed. Importantly, if the entire interval is above zero or a specified value, it supports rejecting a null hypothesis in favor of an alternative hypothesis without directly relying on P-values. This method is crucial in Parts (a) and (b) to answer questions about correlation existence or strength.