/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 100 Suppose that we have assumed the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that we have assumed the straightline regression model $$Y=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\epsilon$$ but the response is affected by a second variable \(x_{2}\) such that the true regression function is $$E(Y)=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x_{1}+\beta_{2} x_{2}$$ Is the estimator of the slope in the simple linear regression model unbiased?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The estimator of the slope \(\beta_1\) is biased if \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are correlated.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Problem

We are given a scenario where the true regression model for a response variable is impacted by two predictors, but we assume a simpler model with only one predictor. We need to determine if the estimator for the slope (\(\beta_1\)) in this simpler model is unbiased.
02

Recall Definition of Unbiased Estimator

An estimator is said to be unbiased if the expected value of the estimator is equal to the true value of the parameter it estimates. Here, we focus on whether the estimated slope (\(b_1\)) from the simple regression model correctly estimates \(\beta_1\) when \(x_2\) is neglected.
03

Identify Impact of Missing Predictor

In this situation, ignoring \(x_2\) leads to omitted variable bias. If \(x_2\) is correlated with \(x_1\), the estimated coefficient \(b_1\) from the simple model does not purely measure the effect of \(x_1\) on \(Y\), but instead captures both the effect of \(x_1\) and any part of the effect of \(x_2\) correlated with \(x_1\).
04

Check Bias Condition

Consider the simple model, \(Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \epsilon'\), where \(\epsilon' = \beta_2 x_2 + \epsilon\). The extra term \(\beta_2 x_2\) in \(\epsilon'\) implies that if \(Cov(x_1, x_2) eq 0\), the term \(\beta_2 x_2\) acts as an omitted variable bias, leading to \(E(b_1) eq \beta_1\).
05

Conclusion

Since the omitted variable \(x_2\) does bias the estimation of \(\beta_1\) if \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are correlated, the estimator for \(\beta_1\) is biased because it mixes effects from both \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) when \(x_2\) is correlated with \(x_1\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Regression Analysis
Regression analysis is an important statistical tool used to understand the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. In our simple regression model, where we predict a response variable \(Y\) using a single predictor \(x_1\), the expression is \(Y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \epsilon\). This setup assumes that \(x_1\) alone accounts for the changes in \(Y\).
However, real-world data often involve multiple variables impacting the dependent variable, leading us to use more complex models.

In this exercise, the true relationship involves a second predictor \(x_2\). The true model is \(E(Y) = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x_1 + \beta_2 x_2\). By not including \(x_2\) in the regression model, it results in what is known as omitted variable bias. When a relevant variable is left out and it's correlated with included predictors, the estimates in our model potentially become inaccurate. This bias is one of the collective reasons for careful variable selection in regression analysis.
Unbiased Estimator
An unbiased estimator is a statistical estimate that, on average, exactly matches the true population parameter. In simpler terms, if you repeated an estimation an infinite number of times, an unbiased estimator would converge on the true parameter value. In the context of regression, for an estimator of the slope \(b_1\) to be unbiased, we require \(E(b_1) = \beta_1\).

However, when we overlook an influential variable like \(x_2\) in our regression model while assuming it only depends on \(x_1\), the resulting estimator can become biased. The formula reliant on \(x_1\) alone misattributes some effect to it that actually belongs to \(x_2\). Thus, the expected value \(E(b_1)\) would not equal \(\beta_1\) due to the omitted variable \(x_2\), especially if \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are correlated. Hence, it is crucial to recognize and include all relevant predictors in regression models if we aim to maintain the accuracy and reliability of our estimations.
Correlation
Correlation refers to a statistical measure that expresses the extent to which two or more variables fluctuate in relation to each other. When two variables tend to increase and decrease in tandem, we say they are positively correlated, while if one increases as the other decreases, they are negatively correlated. In the context of regression, correlation among predictors like \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) can significantly affect the model.

If \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) are correlated and \(x_2\) is omitted from the regression model, the estimate of \(\beta_1\) captures both the effect of \(x_1\) on \(Y\) and part of the effect of \(x_2\) that correlates with \(x_1\). This occurrence leads to omitted variable bias, compromising the model's validity.

Understanding correlation ensures that multiple predictors which contribute to a response variable are included in the regression model, thus avoiding biases and improving the robustness of findings. It emphasizes the necessity to gauge the dependency between the predictors to ensure an unbiased estimate of their effects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An article in Wear (Vol. \(152,1992,\) pp. \(171-181\) ) presents data on the fretting wear of mild steel and oil viscosity. Representative data follow, with \(x=\) oil viscosity and \(y=\) wear volume \(\left(10^{-4}\right.\) cubic millimeters) $$\begin{aligned}&\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c}y & 240 & 181 & 193 & 155 & 172 \\\\\hline x & 1.6 & 9.4 & 15.5 & 20.0 & 22.0\end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{l|c|c|c|c}y & 110 & 113 & 75 & 94 \\\\\hline x & 35.5 & 43.0 & 40.5 & 33.0\end{array}\end{aligned}$$ (a) Construct a scatter plot of the data. Does a simple linear regression model appear to be plausible? (b) Fit the simple linear regression model using least squares. Find an estimate of \(\sigma^{2}\) (c) Predict fretting wear when viscosity \(x=30\). (d) Obtain the fitted value of \(y\) when \(x=22.0\) and calculate the corresponding residual.

Consider the following data. Suppose that the relationship between \(Y\) and \(x\) is hypothesized to be \(Y=\left(\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} x+\epsilon\right)^{-1}\). Fit an appropriate model to the data. Does the assumed model form seem reasonable? $$\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}x & 10 & 15 & 18 & 12 & 9 & 8 & 11 & 6 \\\\\hline y & 0.1 & 0.13 & 0.09 & 0.15 & 0.20 & 0.21 & 0.18 & 0.24\end{array}$$

The final test and exam averages for 20 randomly selected students taking a course in engineering statistics and a course in operations research follow. Assume that the final averages are jointly normally distributed. (a) Find the regression line relating the statistics final average to the OR final average. Graph the data. (b) Test for significance of regression using \(\alpha=0.05\). (c) Estimate the correlation coefficient. (d) Test the hypothesis that \(\rho=0,\) using \(\alpha=0.05 .\) (e) Test the hypothesis that \(\rho=0.5,\) using \(\alpha=0.05 .\) (f) Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the correlation coefficient $$\begin{array}{cccccc}\hline \text { Statistics } & \text { OR } & \text { Statistics } & \text { OR } & \text { Statistics } & \text { OR } \\\\\hline 86 & 80 & 86 & 81 & 83 & 81 \\\75 & 81 & 71 & 76 & 75 & 70 \\\69 & 75 & 65 & 72 & 71 & 73 \\\75 & 81 & 84 & 85 & 76 & 72 \\\90 & 92 & 71 & 72 & 84 & 80 \\\94 & 95 & 62 & 65 & 97 & 98 \\\83 & 80 & 90 & 93 & &\end{array}$$

In an article in Statistics and Computing ['An Iterative Monte Carlo Method for Nonconjugate Bayesian Analysis" (1991, pp. \(119-128)\) ] Carlin and Gelfand investigated the age \((x)\) and length \((y)\) of 27 captured dugongs (sea cows). $$\begin{aligned}x=& 1.0,1.5,1.5,1.5,2.5,4.0,5.0,5.0,7.0,8.0,8.5,9.0,9.5, \\\& 9.5,10.0,12.0,12.0,13.0,13.0,14.5,15.5,15.5,16.5, \\ & 17.0,22.5,29.0,31.5 \\\y=& 1.80,1.85,1.87,1.77,2.02,2.27,2.15,2.26,2.47,2.19, \\\& 2.26,2.40,2.39,2.41,2.50,2.32,2.32,2.43,2.47,2.56, \\ & 2.65,2.47,2.64,2.56,2.70,2.72,2.57\end{aligned}$$ (a) Find the least squares estimates of the slope and the intercept in the simple linear regression model. Find an estimate of \(\sigma^{2}\) (b) Estimate the mean length of dugongs at age 11 . (c) Obtain the fitted values \(\hat{y}_{i}\) that correspond to each observed value \(y_{i} .\) Plot \(\hat{y}_{i}\) versus \(y_{i},\) and comment on what this plot would look like if the linear relationship between length and age were perfectly deterministic (no error). Does this plot indicate that age is a reasonable choice of regressor variable in this model?

An article in Wood Science and Technology [ "Creep in Chipboard, Part 3 : Initial Assessment of the Influence of Moisture Content and Level of Stressing on Rate of Creep and Time to Failure" (1981, Vol. \(15,\) pp. \(125-144\) ) ] studied the deflection (mm) of particleboard from stress levels of relative humidity. Assume that the two variables are related according to the simple linear regression model. The data are shown below: \(\begin{array}{l}x=\text { Stress level }(\%): 54 & 54 & 61 & 61\end{array} \quad 68\) \(y=\) Deflection \((\mathrm{mm}): 16.473 \quad 18.693 \quad 14.305 \quad 15.121 \quad 13.505\) \(x=\) Stress level \((\%): 68 \quad 75 \quad 75 \quad 75\) \(y=\) Deflection \((\mathrm{mm}): 11.64011 .16812 .53411 .224\) (a) Calculate the least square estimates of the slope and intercept. What is the estimate of \(\sigma^{2}\) ? Graph the regression model and the data. (b) Find the estimate of the mean deflection if the stress level can be limited to \(65 \%\) (c) Estimate the change in the mean deflection associated with a \(5 \%\) increment in stress level. (d) To decrease the mean deflection by one millimeter, how much increase in stress level must be generated? (e) Given that the stress level is \(68 \%,\) find the fitted value of deflection and the corresponding residual.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.