/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 The deflection temperature under... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The deflection temperature under load for two different types of plastic pipe is being investigated. Two random samples of 15 pipe specimens are tested, and the deflection temperatures observed are as follows (in \({ }^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) ): $$\begin{array}{l}\text { Type } 1: 206,188,205,187,194,193,207,185,189,213,192,210,194,178,205 \end{array}$$ $$\begin{array}{l}\text { Type } 2: 177,197,206,201,180,176,185,200,197,192, 198,188,189,203,192 \end{array}$$ (a) Construct box plots and normal probability plots for the two samples. Do these plots provide support of the assumptions of normality and equal variances? Write a practical interpretation for these plots. (b) Do the data support the claim that the deflection temperature under load for type 1 pipe exceeds that of type \(2 ?\) In reaching your conclusions, use \(\alpha=0.05 .\) Calculate a \(P\) -value (c) If the mean deflection temperature for type 1 pipe exceeds that of type 2 by as much as \(5^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\), it is important to detect this difference with probability at least \(0.90 .\) Is the choice of \(n_{1}=n_{2}=15\) adequate? Use \(\alpha=0.05\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Box and normal probability plots suggest equal variance and normality. P-value analysis supports type 1 exceeding type 2. A sample size of 15 is adequate for detecting a 5-degree difference with high power.

Step by step solution

01

Construct Box Plots

To construct box plots, first organize the data for both types in ascending order. Plot these as box plots for each sample: - **Type 1**: Average temperature is centered around the box, with quartiles indicating symmetry or skewness. - **Type 2**: Similarly, the box plot will show central tendency and dispersion. Look for overlaps and spread to gauge equal variances. Evaluate skewness and outliers for normality. Ideally, box plots should be symmetric without outliers to assume normality.
02

Construct Normal Probability Plots

Create normal probability plots for the data in each type. Plot each data point against a theoretical normal distribution. - **Type 1** and **Type 2** should show a roughly straight line if the data follows a normal distribution. Deviations from this line could imply non-normality.
03

Interpret Box and Probability Plots

Compare spread and shapes of box plots to check variances. Use normal probability plots to assess normality. - Equal spread in box plots implies equal variances. - A linear pattern in probability plots indicates normality. Summarize if assumptions hold based on plots.
04

Formulate Hypothesis for Temperature Comparison

To test if the deflection temperature of type 1 exceeds type 2: - **Null Hypothesis (H鈧)**: No difference in means between type 1 and type 2. - **Alternative Hypothesis (H鈧)**: Mean temperature of type 1 > type 2.
05

Conduct Two-Sample t-test

Assuming equal variances, use the t-test formula:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}}\]Where:- \(\bar{x}_1, \bar{x}_2\) are means of type 1 and 2.- \(s_p\) is the pooled standard deviation.- \(n\) is the sample size. Calculate the t-statistic and p-value.
06

Compare P-value to Significance Level

Evaluate the p-value under \(\alpha = 0.05\). If p-value < 0.05, reject H鈧 in favor of H鈧, supporting that type 1 exceeds type 2.Summarize decision from test evidence.
07

Calculate Power of Test for Detectable Difference

To determine if sample size is adequate, calculate the power of the test:- Set detectable difference \( \delta = 5 \)- Calculate required power using:\[1 - \beta = P(Z > z_\alpha + \frac{\delta}{s_p\sqrt{2/n}})\]where \( Z \) is the standard normal deviate.Check if power > 0.90, assessing sample adequacy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Box Plot
Box plots are a great way to visually display the distribution of data and summarize its key characteristics like central tendency and variability. For Type 1 and Type 2 plastic pipes, you can create box plots by first organizing each set of data in ascending order. The box plot will show you the median (center line of the box), the quartiles (edges of the box), and possible outliers (points outside the whiskers).

When you look at these plots, pay attention to:
  • Symmetry - If the box plot appears roughly symmetrical, this suggests that the data might be normally distributed.
  • Spread - The length of the box indicates the interquartile range, which helps in assessing the variance of the data.
  • Outliers - Points that lie outside the whiskers could indicate anomalies or deviations from normality.
By comparing the box plots for Type 1 and Type 2, if they appear similar in spread and symmetry, this supports the assumption of equal variances.
Normal Probability Plot
A normal probability plot, also known as a Q-Q plot, is useful in determining whether a data set follows a normal distribution. To create one, each data point is plotted against the expected value from a normal distribution.

Here's what you should look for:
  • A Straight Line - If the data points form a roughly straight line, this indicates that the data approximates a normal distribution.
  • Curvature or Deviation - Any noticeable curvature or deviation from the line could imply the data is not normal.
For both types of plastic pipes, drawing such plots helps validate the assumption of normality, which is crucial for further statistical analyses, such as the t-test. When evaluating, ensure both Type 1 and Type 2 are aligned along a straight line to support the normality assumption.
Two-Sample t-test
The two-sample t-test is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. In this case, you assess whether the mean deflection temperature of Type 1 pipes exceeds that of Type 2.

To conduct a two-sample t-test:
  • Formulate Hypotheses:
    - Null Hypothesis ( H鈧): The means of both types are equal.
    - Alternative Hypothesis ( H鈧): The mean of Type 1 is greater than Type 2.
  • Assume equal variances, if supported by plots.
  • Calculate the t-statistic using:\[t = \frac{\bar{x}_1 - \bar{x}_2}{s_p \sqrt{\frac{2}{n}}}\]where \( \bar{x}_1 \) and \( \bar{x}_2 \) are the sample means, \( s_p \) is the pooled standard deviation, and \( n \) is the sample size.
  • Determine the p-value - If the p-value is below 0.05, you reject the null hypothesis, supporting that Type 1 exceeds Type 2.
This statistical test helps in making a probabilistic decision about the differences in mean temperatures based on sample data.
Statistical Power
Statistical power is the probability that a test will correctly reject a false null hypothesis. In simpler terms, it's the likelihood of detecting a true effect if there really is one. For the plastic pipe temperature tests, the desired power is at least 0.90, meaning there's a 90% chance of detecting a 5 degree difference if it exists.

To assess power adequacy:
  • Calculate the power using the formula:\[1 - \beta = P(Z > z_\alpha + \frac{\delta}{s_p\sqrt{2/n}})\]where \( \delta \) is the detectable difference (here, 5 degrees), and \( Z \) is the standard normal deviate.
  • Check if the calculated power meets or exceeds 0.90.
If the power is insufficient, you may need to increase the sample size to reliably detect the temperature difference, ensuring your conclusions are statistically robust.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it was felt that without a control group of children there would be no sound basis for evaluating the efficacy of the Salk vaccine, the vaccine was administered to one group, and a placebo (visually identical to the vaccine but known to have no effect) was administered to a second group. For ethical reasons, and because it was suspected that knowledge of vaccine administration would affect subsequent diagnoses, the experiment was conducted in a doubleblind fashion. That is, neither the subjects nor the administrators knew who received the vaccine and who received the placebo. The actual data for this experiment are as follows: Placebo group: \(n=201,299: 110\) cases of polio observed Vaccine group: \(n=200,745: 33\) cases of polio observed (a) Use a hypothesis-testing procedure to determine if the proportion of children in the two groups who contracted paralytic polio is statistically different. Use a probability of a type I error equal to \(0.05 .\) (b) Repeat part (a) using a probability of a type I error equal to 0.01 (c) Compare your conclusions from parts (a) and (b) and explain why they are the same or different.

The manager of a fleet of automobiles is testing two brands of radial tires. He assigns one tire of each brand at random to the two rear wheels of eight cars and runs the cars until the tires wear out. The data (in kilometers) follow. Find a \(99 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean life. Which brand would you prefer, based on this calculation? $$\begin{array}{ccc}\hline \text { Car } & \text { Brand 1 } & \text { Brand 2 } \\ \hline 1 & 36,925 & 34,318 \\ 2 & 45,300 & 42,280 \\ 3 & 36,240 & 35,500 \\ 4 & 32,100 & 31,950 \\ 5 & 37,210 & 38,015 \\ 6 & 48,360 & 47,800 \\\ 7 & 38,200 & 37,810 \\ 8 & 33,500 & 33,215 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Two different foam expanding agents that can be used in the nozzles of fire- fighting spray equipment. A random sample of five observations with an aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) had a sample mean of 4.7 and a standard deviation of \(0.6 .\) A random sample of five observations with alcohol-type concentrates (ATC) had a sample mean of 6.9 and a standard deviation 0.8 . (a) Can you draw any conclusions about differences in mean foam expansion? Assume that both populations are well represented by normal distributions with the same standard deviations. (b) Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval on the difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents.

Investigated the behavior of a stochastic generator in the presence of external noise. The number of periods was measured in a sample of 100 trains for each of two different levels of noise voltage, 100 and \(150 \mathrm{mV}\). For \(100 \mathrm{mV}\), the mean number of periods in a train was 7.9 with \(s=2.6\). For \(150 \mathrm{mV}\), the mean was 6.9 with \(s=2.4\). (a) It was originally suspected that raising noise voltage would reduce mean number of periods. Do the data support this claim? Use \(\alpha=0.01\) and assume that each population is normally distributed and the two population variances are equal. What is the \(P\) -value for this test? (b) Calculate a confidence interval to answer the question in part (a).

In a random sample of 200 Phoenix residents who drive a domestic car, 165 reported wearing their seat belt regularly, while another sample of 250 Phoenix residents who drive a foreign car revealed 198 who regularly wore their seat belt. (a) Perform a hypothesis-testing procedure to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in seat belt usage between domestic and foreign car drivers. Set your probability of a type I error to \(0.05 .\) (b) Perform a hypothesis-testing procedure to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in seat belt usage between domestic and foreign car drivers. Set your probability of a type I error to 0.1 (c) Compare your answers for parts (a) and (b) and explain why they are the same or different. (d) Suppose that all the numbers in the problem description were doubled. That is, in a random sample of 400 Phoenix residents who drive a domestic car, 330 reported wearing their seat belt regularly, while another sample of 500 Phoenix residents who drive a foreign car revealed 396 who regularly wore their seat belt. Repeat parts (a) and (b) and comment on the effect of increasing the sample size without changing the proportions on your results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.