/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 35 Madison Finance has a total of $... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Madison Finance has a total of $$\$ 20$$ million earmarked for homeowner and auto loans. On the average, homeowner loans have a \(10 \%\) annual rate of return, whereas auto loans yield a \(12 \%\) annual rate of return. Management has also stipulated that the total amount of homeowner loans should be greater than or equal to 4 times the total amount of automobile loans. Determine the total amount of loans of each type that Madison should extend to each category in order to maximize its returns. What are the optimal returns?

Short Answer

Expert verified
To maximize its returns, Madison Finance should extend \( \$ 4 \) million in homeowner loans and \( \$ 16 \) million in auto loans, resulting in an optimal annual return of \( \$ 2.24 \) million.

Step by step solution

01

Define the variables and constraints

Let: - H = total amount of homeowner loans (in millions) - A = total amount of auto loans (in millions) Constraints: 1. The total amount of homeowner loans should be greater than or equal to 4 times the total amount of automobile loans: \(H \ge 4A\) 2. Madison Finance has a total of \( \$20 \) million earmarked for homeowner and auto loans: \(H + A = 20\)
02

Define the objective function

The objective function represents Madison Finance's total returns from both types of loans. For homeowner loans: \(0.10H\) For auto loans: \(0.12A\) Therefore, the objective function to maximize is: \(R(H, A) = 0.10H + 0.12A\)
03

Formulate the problem as a linear program

Maximize \(R(H, A) = 0.10H + 0.12A\) subject to: 1. \(H \ge 4A\) 2. \(H + A = 20\)
04

Solve the problem using graphical method

We can solve this problem graphically by plotting the constraints and identifying the feasible region: 1. Plot the constraint \(H + A = 20\). This line has a slope of -1 and passes through H = 20 and A = 20. 2. Plot the constraint \(H \ge 4A\). This line represents \(H = 4A\) with a slope of 4. The region above this line represents \(H \ge 4A\). 3. Identify the feasible region, which is the set of points on the graph that satisfy both constraints. In this case, it's the area above the line \(H = 4A\) and to the left of the line \(H + A = 20\). 4. Identify the vertices of the feasible region: the points where the constraints lines intersect. In this case, there are 2 vertices: (4, 16) and (15, 5).
05

Find the optimal solution

Evaluate the objective function, R(H, A), at each vertex of the feasible region to find the maximum return: 1. At vertex (4, 16): \(R(4, 16) = 0.10(4) + 0.12(16) = 2.24\) 2. At vertex (15, 5): \(R(15, 5) = 0.10(15) + 0.12(5) = 1.80\) The maximum return is achieved at vertex (4, 16), where the annual return is \( \$ 2.24 \) million. In order to maximize its returns, Madison Finance should extend: - Homeowner loans: \( \$ 4 \) million - Auto loans: \( \$ 16 \) million The optimal returns will be \( \$ 2.24 \) million per year.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Optimization Problems in Finance
Optimization problems in finance are crucial for making decisions that aim to achieve the best outcome within a given set of constraints. For instance, companies like Madison Finance need to determine the optimal allocation of resources—in this case, funds—to maximize returns. An optimization problem typically involves an objective, which in a financial context could be maximizing profit or minimizing costs, and is subject to certain limitations known as constraints.

These problems require identifying the best possible solution from a range of feasible options. In the case of Madison Finance, the optimization was used to allocate funds between homeowner and auto loans to achieve maximum returns. Through mathematical modeling, as demonstrated in the textbook solution, finance professionals can use optimization to make informed strategic decisions that contribute positively to a company's financial objectives.
Objective Function in Financial Decision-Making
The objective function is the heartbeat of any optimization problem. It is a formula that needs to be maximized or minimized. In finance, the objective function represents the goal of an investment or allocation decision—this could be to maximize returns, as with Madison Finance, or to minimize risks or costs depending on the scenario.

In our exercise, the objective function was about maximizing returns from homeowner and auto loans. It was expressed as a mathematical equation \( R(H, A) = 0.10H + 0.12A \), indicating the total return based on the amounts allocated to homeowner loans \( H \) and auto loans \( A \). The solution process focused on finding the values of \( H \) and \( A \) that would yield the maximum return, demonstrating how pivotal the objective function is in steering the course towards the optimal financial decision.
Feasible Region in Linear Programming
The feasible region is a cornerstone concept in linear programming and represents all possible solutions that satisfy the problem's constraints. In the context of finance and our problem, it is the set of all possible combinations of homeowner and auto loans that Madison Finance could extend within its limits.

To visualize this, imagine graphing the constraints on a two-dimensional plane, with each point representing a potential strategy for loan allocation. The area that encompasses all the strategies that meet Madison Finance's criteria constitutes the feasible region. For example, in our solved exercise, the feasible region was bounded by the constraint that homeowner loans must be at least four times greater than auto loans, and the total amount for loans was fixed at $20 million. The feasible region guided us to the point that maximized the returns, providing a vivid demonstration of how constraints define the boundaries of financial strategy and decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

National Business Machines Corporation manufactures two models of fax machines: \(A\) and \(B\). Each model A costs $$\$ 100$$ to make, and each model B costs $$\$ 150$$. The profits are $$\$ 30$$ for each model-A and $$\$ 40$$ for each model-B fax machine. If the total number of fax machines demanded each month does not exceed 2500 and the company has earmarked no more than $$\$ 600,000 /$$ month for manufacturing costs, find how many units of each model National should make each month in order to maximize its monthly profit. What is the largest monthly profit the company can make?

Sharon has a total of $$\$ 200,000$$ to invest in three types of mutual funds: growth, balanced, and income funds. Growth funds have a rate of return of \(12 \% /\) year, balanced funds have a rate of return of \(10 \% /\) year, and income funds have a return of \(6 \%\) /year. The growth, balanced, and income mutual funds are assigned risk factors of \(0.1,0.06\), and \(0.02\), respectively. Sharon has decided that at least \(50 \%\) of her total portfolio is to be in income funds and at least \(25 \%\) in balanced funds. She has also decided that the average risk factor for her investment should not exceed \(0.05\). How much should Sharon invest in each type of fund in order to realize a maximum return on her investment? What is the maximum return?

You are given the final simplex tablea for the dual problem. Give the solution to the primal prob lem and the solution to the associated dual problem. \(\begin{array}{rr}\text { Problem: Minimize } & C=10 x+3 y+10 z \\ \text { subject to } & 2 x+y+5 z \geq 20 \\ & 4 x+y+z \geq 30 \\ x & \geq 0, y \geq 0, z \geq 0\end{array}\) Final tableau: $$ \begin{array}{rrrrrr|r} u & v & x & y & z & P & \text { Constant } \\ \hline 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{2} & -1 & 0 & 0 & 2 \\ 1 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & 2 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 2 & -9 & 1 & 0 & 3 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 5 & 10 & 0 & 1 & 80 \end{array} $$

Solve each linear programming problem by the method of corners. $$ \begin{array}{l} \text { Maximize } P=4 x+2 y \\ \text { subject to } \quad x+y \leq 8 \\ \quad 2 x+y \leq 10 \\ x \geq 0, y \geq 0 \end{array} $$

Perth Mining Company operates two mines for the purpose of extracting gold and silver. The Saddle Mine costs $$\$ 14,000 $$ day to operate, and it yields 50 oz of gold and 3000 oz of silver each day. The Horseshoe Mine costs $$\$ 16,000 $$ day to operate, and it yields 75 oz of gold and 1000 oz of silver each day. Company management has set a target of at least 650 oz of gold and 18,000 oz of silver. How many days should each mine be operated so that the target can be met at a minimum cost? What is the minimum cost?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.