/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 70 Determine whether the statement ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Determine whether the statement is true or false. If it is true, explain why it is true. If it is false, give an example to show why it is false. If the augmented matrix corresponding to a system of three linear equations in three variables has a row of the form $\left[\begin{array}{lll|l}0 & 0 & 0 & a\end{array}\right]\(, where \)a$ is a nonzero number, then the system has no solution.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The statement is true. If the augmented matrix corresponding to a system of three linear equations in three variables has a row of the form \(\left[\begin{array}{lll|l}0 & 0 & 0 & a\end{array}\right]\), where \(a\) is a nonzero number, it represents the false equation \(0=a\). Such a false statement indicates that the system is inconsistent, and therefore, has no solution.

Step by step solution

01

Analyzing the given row

Since we have a row of the form \(\left[\begin{array}{lll|l}0 & 0 & 0 & a\end{array}\right]\), where \(a\) is a nonzero number, it means that we have a false statement. If we write down this row as one of the linear equations, it becomes: \[ 0x + 0y + 0z = a \] or this can be simplified as \[ 0 = a\] Given that \(a\) is a nonzero number, this equation is false as \(0\) cannot equal a nonzero number.
02

Conclusion

The statement is true. If the augmented matrix corresponding to a system of three linear equations in three variables has a row of the given form, it means that we have one of the linear equations giving us a false statement. This means that the system is inconsistent, and it has no solution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

DruG DosaGES A method sometimes used by pediatricians to calculate the dosage of medicine for children is based on the child's surface area. If \(a\) denotes the adult dosage (in milligrams) and if \(S\) is the child's surface area (in square meters), then the child's dosage is given by $$ D(S)=\frac{S a}{1.7} $$ a. Show that \(D\) is a linear function of \(S\). Hint: Think of \(D\) as having the form \(D(S)=m S+b\). What are the slope \(m\) and the \(y\) -intercept \(b\) ? b. If the adult dose of a drug is \(500 \mathrm{mg}\), how much should a child whose surface area is \(0.4 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) receive?

According to the World Wildlife Fund, a group in the forefront of the fight against illegal ivory trade, the price of ivory (in dollars/kilo) compiled from a variety of legal and black market sources is approximated by the function $$ f(t)=\left\\{\begin{array}{ll} 8.37 t+7.44 & \text { if } 0 \leq t \leq 8 \\ 2.84 t+51.68 & \text { if } 8

LCDS VERSUS CRTS The global shipments of traditional cathode-ray tube monitors (CRTs) is approximated by the equation $$ y=-12 t+88 \quad(0 \leq t \leq 3) $$ where \(y\) is measured in millions and \(t\) in years, with \(t=0\) corresponding to the beginning of 2001 . The equation $$ y=18 t+13.4 \quad(0 \leq t \leq 3) $$ gives the approximate number (in millions) of liquid crystal displays (LCDs) over the same period. When did the global shipments of LCDs first overtake the global shipments of CRTs?

In Exercises 1-18, find the vertex, the \(x\) -intercepts (if any), and sketch the parabola. \(f(x)=x^{2}+x-6\)

CANCER SURVIVORS The number of living Americans who have had a cancer diagnosis has increased drastically since 1971 . In part, this is due to more testing for cancer and better treatment for some cancers. In part, it is because the population is older, and cancer is largely a disease of the elderly. The number of cancer survivors (in millions) between \(1975(t=0)\) and \(2000(t=25)\) is approximately $$ N(t)=0.0031 t^{2}+0.16 t+3.6 \quad(0 \leq t \leq 25) $$ a. How many living Americans had a cancer diagnosis in \(1975 ?\) In \(2000 ?\) b. Assuming the trend continued, how many cancer survivors were there in 2005 ?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.