/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Scale invariance a. In the sim... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Scale invariance a. In the simple regression model (2.1), suppose the value of the predictor \(X\) is replaced by \(c X,\) where \(c\) is some non zero constant. How are \(\hat{\beta}_{0}\) \(\hat{\beta}_{1}, \hat{\sigma}^{2}, R^{2},\) and the \(t\) -test of \(\mathrm{NH}: \beta_{1}=0\) affected by this change? b. Suppose each value of the response \(Y\) is replaced by \(d Y,\) for some \(d \neq 0 .\) Repeat 2.8 .1

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary: a. Scaling the predictor variable X by a non-zero constant c affects: - \(\hat{\beta}_0\): unchanged - \(\hat{\beta}_1\): scales by \(\frac{1}{c}\) - \(\hat{\sigma}^2\): unchanged - \(R^2\): unchanged - t-test statistic: unchanged b. Scaling the response variable Y by a non-zero constant d affects: - \(\hat{\beta}_0\): scales by d - \(\hat{\beta}_1\): scales by d - \(\hat{\sigma}^2\): scales by \(d^2\) - \(R^2\): unchanged - t-test statistic: unchanged

Step by step solution

01

a. Scaling the predictor variable X by a non-zero constant c

First, we need to find the modified regression model for this transformation. The original regression model is: \[Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1X_i + \epsilon_i\] Now we replace \(X_i\) by \(cX_i\): \[Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1(cX_i) + \epsilon_i\] Now we'll analyze how this transformation affects the estimates of the parameters and other related statistics.
02

Effects on \(\hat{\beta}_0\) and \(\hat{\beta}_1\)

In order to estimate the regression coefficients, we can use the following formulas: \[\hat{\beta}_1 = \frac{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})(Y_i-\bar{Y})}{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})^2}\] \[\hat{\beta}_0 = \bar{Y} - \hat{\beta}_1\bar{X}\] With the transformation, we have \(\bar{X'}=c\bar{X}\), and the formula for the new \(\hat{\beta}_1'\) becomes: \[\hat{\beta}_1' = \frac{\sum (cX_i-c\bar{X})(Y_i-\bar{Y})}{\sum(cX_i-c\bar{X})^2} = \frac{c \sum (X_i-\bar{X})(Y_i-\bar{Y})}{c^2\sum (X_i-\bar{X})^2} = \frac{\hat{\beta}_1}{c}\] Similarly, for the new \(\hat{\beta}_0'\): \[\hat{\beta}_0' = \bar{Y} - \hat{\beta}_1'\bar{X'} = \bar{Y} - \frac{\hat{\beta}_1}{c}(c\bar{X}) = \beta_0\]
03

Effects on \(\hat{\sigma}^2\), \(R^2\), and the t-test

Next, we'll analyze how the transformation affects other related statistics. First, note that: \[\hat{\sigma}^2 = \frac{\sum (Y_i-\hat{Y}_i)^2}{n-2} = \frac{\sum(Y_i-\hat{\beta}_0-\hat{\beta}_1X_i)^2}{n-2}\] After replacing \(X_i\) by \(cX_i\): \[\hat{\sigma'}^2 = \frac{\sum (Y_i-\hat{\beta}_0' -\hat{\beta}_1'cX_i)^2}{n-2} = \frac{\sum(Y_i-\hat{\beta}_0-\frac{\hat{\beta}_1}{c}cX_i)^2}{n-2} = \hat{\sigma}^2\] For \(R^2\), since \(\hat{\beta}_0\) and \(\hat{\beta}_1\) only scale with the transformation, the proportion of explained variance remains the same: \[R'^2 = R^2\] Lastly, the t-test for the null hypothesis \(\beta_1 = 0\) is given by: \[t = \frac{\hat{\beta}_1}{s.e.(\hat{\beta}_1)}\] Since the standard error of \(\hat{\beta}_1\) is directly proportional to the standard deviation of X (which is scaled by c), the t-test statistic remains unchanged: \[t' = t\]
04

b. Scaling the response variable Y by a non-zero constant d

Now we'll analyze the effects of scaling the response variable Y by a non-zero constant d. The transformed regression model is: \[dY_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1X_i + d\epsilon_i\] Note that now, both the response variable and the error term are multiplied by d.
05

Effects on \(\hat{\beta}_0\) and \(\hat{\beta}_1\)

In this case, we'll find the modified estimates for the regression coefficients: \[\hat{\beta}_1'' = \frac{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})(dY_i-d\bar{Y})}{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})^2} = d\frac{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})(Y_i-\bar{Y})}{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})^2} = d\hat{\beta}_1\] \[\hat{\beta}_0'' = d\bar{Y} - \hat{\beta}_1''\bar{X} = d(\bar{Y} - \hat{\beta}_1\bar{X}) = d\hat{\beta}_0\]
06

Effects on \(\hat{\sigma}^2\), \(R^2\), and the t-test

For the residual variance: \[\hat{\sigma}''^2 = \frac{\sum (dY_i-\hat{Y}_i'')^2}{n-2} = d^2\frac{\sum(Y_i-\hat{\beta}_0-\hat{\beta}_1X_i)^2}{n-2} = d^2\hat{\sigma}^2\] The coefficient of determination remains unchanged because the ratios of explained and unexplained variance are not affected by the scaling: \[R''^2 = R^2\] Lastly, the t-test for the null hypothesis \(\beta_1 = 0\) becomes: \[t'' = \frac{\hat{\beta}_1''}{s.e.(\hat{\beta}_1'')} = \frac{d\hat{\beta}_1}{\sqrt{d^2}s.e.(\hat{\beta}_1)} = t\] In conclusion, scaling the predictor variable X by a non-zero constant c will impact \(\hat{\beta}_1\) but not \(\hat{\beta}_0, \hat{\sigma}^2, R^2\), or the t-test statistic. Scaling the response variable Y by a non-zero constant d will impact \(\hat{\beta}_0, \hat{\beta}_1\), and \(\hat{\sigma}^2\), but not \(R^2\) or the t-test statistic.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Simple Regression Model
The simple regression model is a fundamental tool in statistics that helps us understand relationships between two variables. In its essence, it predicts the value of a dependent variable (often denoted as \(Y\)) based on the value of an independent predictor variable \(X\). The model can be mathematically expressed as:
\[ Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1X_i + \epsilon_i \]
Where:
  • \(Y_i\) is the dependent variable for observation \(i\)
  • \(\beta_0\) is the y-intercept of the regression line, representing the predicted value of \(Y\) when \(X=0\)
  • \(\beta_1\) is the slope, which indicates how much \(Y\) changes for a one-unit change in \(X\)
  • \(\epsilon_i\) is the error term, accounting for variability in \(Y\) not explained by \(X\)
By examining this relationship, we can estimate the parameters to make future predictions or test hypotheses about the population.
Parameter Estimation
Parameter estimation involves determining the specific values of the coefficients \(\beta_0\) and \(\beta_1\) in the regression model. This is typically done using least squares estimation, which minimizes the sum of the squared differences between observed values and predicted values.
For the regression coefficient \(\hat{\beta}_1\), the formula used is:
\[\hat{\beta}_1 = \frac{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})(Y_i-\bar{Y})}{\sum (X_i-\bar{X})^2}\]
This formula calculates the slope of the regression line, indicating how much \(Y\) is expected to change when \(X\) increases by one unit.
For the intercept \(\hat{\beta}_0\), it is expressed as:
\[\hat{\beta}_0 = \bar{Y} - \hat{\beta}_1\bar{X}\]
Where \(\bar{Y}\) and \(\bar{X}\) are the means of \(Y\) and \(X\) respectively. These estimations help in creating the best-fit line for the data, allowing researchers and analysts to understand and interpret the relationships between variables.
Coefficient of Determination
The coefficient of determination, denoted as \(R^2\), is a vital statistic in the analysis of regression models. It provides insight into the goodness-of-fit of the model. Simply put, \(R^2\) tells you how well the predictor variables explain the variability of the response variable.
An \(R^2\) value ranges from 0 to 1:
  • An \(R^2\) of 1 means that the regression predictions perfectly fit the data.
  • An \(R^2\) of 0 suggests that the model does not explain any of the variability in the response data around its mean.
It is calculated by comparing the model's estimates to a horizontal line passing through the mean of the response variable. Thus, \(R^2\) assesses the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable(s). Aspiring data analysts find this metric extremely useful in evaluating the effectiveness of their models.
t-test
The t-test in regression analysis is used to determine whether there is a significant relationship between the predictor variable \(X\) and the response variable \(Y\). Specifically, it tests if the coefficient \(\beta_1\) is significantly different from zero. If \(\beta_1\) is not zero, it indicates that \(X\) has a meaningful impact on \(Y\).
The t-statistic is computed as follows:
\[ t = \frac{\hat{\beta}_1}{s.e.(\hat{\beta}_1)} \]
Where \(s.e.(\hat{\beta}_1)\) is the standard error of the estimated coefficient \(\hat{\beta}_1\). This value helps determine if the observed relationship in the sample exists in the larger population. Typically, a large absolute t-value, compared against critical t-values from statistical tables, leads to rejecting the null hypothesis (\(H_0: \beta_1 = 0\)). Thus, it suggests that the predictor variable is a significant contributor to explaining the variations in the response variable.
Predictor Variable Transformation
Transforming a predictor variable is a technique used in regression to address certain issues and improve model performance. For instance, scaling a predictor \(X\) by multiplying it by a constant \(c\) helps to maintain consistency in unit measurements or to potentially enhance the interpretability of regression coefficients.
The transformed model appears as:
\[ Y_i = \beta_0 + \beta_1(cX_i) + \epsilon_i \]
This transformation affects certain parameter estimates. For instance:
  • The slope \(\hat{\beta}_1\) becomes \(\frac{\hat{\beta}_1}{c}\).
  • The intercept \(\hat{\beta}_0\) remains unchanged.
  • The overall fit, measured by \(R^2\), also remains unaffected.
  • The standard deviation of the predictor scales by \(c\), but the t-test result remains the same.
However, such transformation does not affect the goodness-of-fit measure or the statistical significance of predictors in most cases. Just remember that transforming the scale of \(X\) could be beneficial in interpreting the results more clearly or making predictions using new units.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Zipf's law Suppose we counted the number of times each word was used in the written works by Shakespeare, Alexander Hamilton, or some other author with a substantial written record (Table 2.7 ). Can we say anything about the frequencies of the most common words? Suppose we let \(f_{i}\) be the rate per 1000 words of text for the \(i\) th most frequent word used. The linguist George Zipf \((1902-1950)\) observed a law like relationship between rate and rank (Zipf, 1949 ), $$\mathrm{E}\left(f_{i} | i\right)=a / i^{b}$$ and further observed that the exponent is close to \(b=1\). Taking logarithms of both sides, we get approximately $$\mathrm{E}\left(\log \left(f_{i}\right) | \log (i)\right)=\log (a)-b \log (i)$$ Zipf's law has been applied to frequencies of many other classes of objects besides words, such as the frequency of visits to web pages on the internet and the frequencies of species of insects in an ecosystem. The data in MWwords. txt give the frequencies of words in works from four different sources: the political writings of eighteenth-century American political figures Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, and the book Ulysses by twentieth-century Irish writer James Joyce. The data are from Mosteller and Wallace (1964, Table 8.1-1), and give the frequencies of 165 very common words. Several missing values occur in the data; these are really words that were used so infrequently that their count was not reported in Mosteller and Wallace's table. a. Using only the 50 most frequent words in Hamilton's work (that is, using only rows in the data for which HamiltonRank \(\leq 50\) ), draw the appropriate summary graph, estimate the mean function \((2.31),\) and summarize your results. b. Test the hypothesis that \(b=1\) against the two-sided alternative and summarize. c. Repeat Problem \(2.10 .1,\) but for words with rank of 75 or less, and with rank less than \(100 .\) For larger number of words, Zipf's law may break down. Does that seem to happen with these data?

Deviations from the mean Sometimes it is convenient to write the simple linear regression model in a different form that is a little easier to manipulate. Taking equation \((2.1),\) and adding \(\beta_{1} \bar{x}-\beta_{1} \bar{x},\) which equals zero, to the right-hand side, and combining terms, we can write $$\begin{aligned} y_{i} &=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} \bar{x}+\beta_{1} x_{i}-\beta_{1} \bar{x}+e_{i} \\\ &=\left(\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} \bar{x}\right)+\beta_{1}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)+e_{i} \\ &=\alpha+\beta_{1}\left(x_{i}-\bar{x}\right)+e_{i} \end{aligned}$$ where we have defined \(\alpha=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1} \bar{x} .\) This is called the deviations from the sample average form for simple regression. a. What is the meaning of the parameter \(\alpha ?\) b. Show that the least squares estimates are $$\hat{\alpha}=\bar{y}, \quad \hat{\beta}_{1} \text { as given by }(2.5)$$ c. Find expressions for the variances of the estimates and the covariance between them.

Windmills Energy can be produced from wind using windmills. Choosing a site for a wind farm, the location of the windmills, can be a multimillion dollar gamble. If wind is inadequate at the site, then the energy produced over the lifetime of the wind farm can be much less than the cost of building and operation. Prediction of long-term wind speed at a candidate site can be an important component in the decision to build or not to build. since energy produced varies as the square of the wind speed, even small errors can have serious consequences. The data in the file wm1. txt provides measurements that can be used to help in the prediction process. Data were collected every six hours for the year \(2002,\) except that the month of May 2002 is missing. The values Cspd are the calculated wind speeds in meters per second at a candidate site for building a wind farm. These values were collected at tower erected on the site. The values \(R S p d\) are wind speeds at a reference site, which is a nearby location for which wind speeds have been recorded over a very long time period. Airports sometimes serve as reference sites, but in this case, the reference data comes from the National Center for Environmental Modeling; these data are described at http://dss.ucar.edu/datasets/ds090.0/ The reference is about \(50 \mathrm{km}\) south west of the candidate site. Both sites are in the northern part of South Dakota. The data were provided by Mark Ahlstrom and Rolf Miller of WindLogics. a. Draw the scatterplot of the response \(C S p d\) versus the predictor \(R S p d\) Is the simple linear regression model plausible for these data? b. Fit the simple regression of the response on the predictor, and present the appropriate regression summaries. c. Obtain a \(95 \%\) prediction interval for \(C S p d\) at a time when \(R S p d=\) 7.4285 d. For this problem, we revert to generic notation and let \(x=C S p d\) and \(y=C S p d\) and let \(n\) be the number of cases used in the regression \((n=1116 \text { in the data we have used in this problem) and } \bar{x}\) and SXX defined from these \(n\) observations. Suppose we want to make predictions at \(m\) time points with values of wind speed \(x_{* 1}, \ldots, x_{* m}\) that are different from the \(n\) cases used in constructing the prediction equation. Show that (1) the average of the \(m\) predictions is equal to the prediction taken at the average value \(\bar{x}_{*}\) of the \(m\) values of the predictor, and (2) using the first result, the standard error of the average of \(m\) predictions is se of average prediction \(=\sqrt{\frac{\hat{\sigma}^{2}}{m}+\hat{\sigma}^{2}\left(\frac{1}{n}+\frac{\left(\bar{x}_{*}-\bar{x}\right)^{2}}{S X X}\right)}\) If \(m\) is very large, then the first term in the square root is negligible, and the standard error of average prediction is essentially the same as the standard error of a fitted value at \(\bar{x}_{*}\) e. For the period from January 1,1948 to July \(31,2003,\) a total of \(m=62039\) wind speed measurements are available at the reference site, excluding the data from the year \(2002 .\) For these measurements, the average wind speed was \(\bar{x}_{*}=7.4285 .\) Give a \(95 \%\) prediction interval on the long-term average wind speed at the candidate site. This long-term average of the past is then taken as an estimate of the long-term average of the future and can be used to help decide if the candidate is a suitable site for a wind farm.

For the Ft. Collins snow fall data discussed in Example 1.1 , test the hypothesis that the slope is zero versus the alternative that it is not zero. Show that the \(t\) -test of this hypothesis is the same as the \(F\) -test; that is, \(t^{2}=F\)

Regression through the origin Occasionally, a mean function in which the intercept is known \(a\) priori to be zero may be fit. This mean function is given by $$\mathrm{E}(y | x)=\beta_{1} x$$ The residual sum of squares for this model, assuming the errors are independent with common variance \(\sigma^{2},\) is \(R S S=\sum\left(y_{i}-\hat{\beta}_{1} x_{i}\right)^{2}\) a. Show that the least squares estimate of \(\beta_{1}\) is \(\hat{\beta}_{1}=\sum x_{i} y_{i} / \sum x_{i}^{2}\) Show that \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) is unbiased and that \(\operatorname{Var}\left(\hat{\beta}_{1}\right)=\sigma^{2} / \sum x_{i}^{2} .\) Find an expression for \(\hat{\sigma}^{2} .\) How many df does it have? b. Derive the analysis of variance table with the larger model given by \((2.16),\) but with the smaller model specified in \((2.30) .\) Show that the \(F\) -test derived from this table is numerically equivalent to the square of the \(t\) -test (2.23) with \(\beta_{0}^{*}=0\) c. The data in Table 2.6 and in the file snake.txt give \(X=\) water content of snow on April 1 and \(Y=\) water yield from April to July in inches in the Snake River watershed in Wyoming for \(n=17\) years from 1919 to 1935 (from \(\mathrm{Wilm}, 1950\) ). Fit a regression through the origin and find \(\hat{\beta}_{1}\) and \(\sigma^{2}\). Obtain a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\beta_{1} .\) Test the hypothesis that the intercept is zero. d. Plot the residuals versus the fitted values and comment on the adequacy of the mean function with zero intercept. In regression through the origin, \(\sum \hat{e}_{i} \neq 0\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.