/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 47 In \(2011,\) the populations of ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

In \(2011,\) the populations of China and India were approximately 1.34 and 1.19 billion people \(^{69},\) respectively. However, due to central control the annual population growth rate of China was \(0.4 \%\) while the population of India was growing by \(1.37 \%\) each year. If these growth rates remain constant, when will the population of India exceed that of China?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The population of India will exceed that of China in 2043.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We need to determine the year when the population of India will surpass that of China given their respective growth rates. China starts with 1.34 billion people growing at 0.4% annually, and India starts with 1.19 billion people growing at 1.37% annually.
02

Set Up Exponential Growth Models

The population growth for both countries can be described by exponential functions. Let \( P_c(t) \) be the population of China and \( P_i(t) \) the population of India at year \( t \), where year 0 is 2011. So, \( P_c(t) = 1.34 \times (1 + 0.004)^t \) and \( P_i(t) = 1.19 \times (1 + 0.0137)^t \).
03

Establish the Inequality for Population Exceedance

We want to find the smallest year \( t \) such that \( P_i(t) > P_c(t) \). This leads to the inequality: \[ 1.19 \times (1.0137)^t > 1.34 \times (1.004)^t \].
04

Solve the Inequality Algebraically

Divide both sides of the inequality by \( 1.19 \) and \( (1.004)^t \), giving \( (1.0137/1.004)^t > 1.34/1.19 \). Simplify this to \( (1.0095118)^t > 1.12605 \).
05

Take the Natural Logarithm

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we have \( t \cdot \ln(1.0095118) > \ln(1.12605) \).
06

Solve for t

Divide to isolate \( t \): \[ t > \frac{\ln(1.12605)}{\ln(1.0095118)} \]. Calculating this gives \( t \approx 32.02 \).
07

Determine the Year

Since \( t \approx 32.02 \), India will surpass China in population approximately 32 years after 2011, which is the year 2043.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Exponential Growth
Exponential growth is a process where something increases by a constant percentage over equal time periods. Many natural phenomena, including population growth, follow this pattern. In our problem, both China and India's populations are growing exponentially, but at different rates. To describe exponential growth mathematically, we use functions. For China's population, you start with 1.34 billion and multiply it by an annual growth factor of 1.004. Similarly for India, the starting population is 1.19 billion, and the annual growth factor is 1.0137.
These functions allow us to predict how populations will grow in the future. They look like this:
  • China: \( P_c(t) = 1.34 \times (1.004)^t \)
  • India: \( P_i(t) = 1.19 \times (1.0137)^t \)
The t in these equations represents the number of years after 2011. Thus, understanding exponential growth is key to predicting when India's population will eventually surpass that of China.
Inequality Solving
To find out when India's population will exceed China's, we used inequality solving. An inequality is a mathematical statement that shows one expression is greater than or less than another. In this case, we're interested in when India's population expression becomes greater than China's. This is expressed with the inequality:
\[ 1.19 \times (1.0137)^t > 1.34 \times (1.004)^t \]
The process involves manipulating both sides of this inequality to isolate the growth factors on one side. By simplifying, dividing, and rearranging terms, we end up with:
\[ (1.0137/1.004)^t > 1.34/1.19 \]
This form of an inequality lets us directly compare the relative growth speeds of the two populations, crucial for determining when India overtakes China.
Algebraic Manipulation
Algebraic manipulation involves changing the structure of an equation or inequality to make it easier to solve. In this exercise, it was necessary to break down the initial inequality to a form where we could isolate the variable t. This was done by dividing both sides by certain constants and rearranging equations.
Next, we utilized logarithms, which are inverse operations to exponents, to handle the exponential parts. Taking natural logarithms on both sides transforms the exponential inequality into a simple linear one:
\[ t \cdot \ln(1.0095118) > \ln(1.12605) \]
The process involves isolating t by dividing both sides by \( \ln(1.0095118) \). This manipulation allows us to solve for t directly, leading to:
\[ t > \frac{\ln(1.12605)}{\ln(1.0095118)} \]
A key takeaway is that algebraic manipulation is crucial when dealing with exponential inequalities, as regular algebraic methods won't suffice.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(a) Which (if any) of the functions in the following table could be linear? Find formulas for those functions. (b) Which (if any) of these functions could be exponential? Find formulas for those functions. $$\begin{array}{r|c|c|c} \hline x & f(x) & g(x) & h(x) \\ \hline-2 & 12 & 16 & 37 \\ -1 & 17 & 24 & 34 \\ 0 & 20 & 36 & 31 \\ 1 & 21 & 54 & 28 \\ 2 & 18 & 81 & 25 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

For children and adults with diseases such as asthma, the number of respiratory deaths per year increases by \(0.33 \%\) when pollution particles increase by a microgram per cubic meter of \operatorname{air}^{66}. (a) Write a formula for the number of respiratory deaths per year as a function of quantity of pollution in the air. (Let \(Q_{0}\) be the number of deaths per year with no pollution.) (b) What quantity of air pollution results in twice as many respiratory deaths per year as there would be without pollution?

A company produces and sells shirts. The fixed costs are 7000 dollars and the variable costs are 5 dollars per shirt. (a) Shirts are sold for 12 dollars each. Find cost and revenue as functions of the quantity of shirts, \(q\) (b) The company is considering changing the selling price of the shirts. Demand is \(q=2000-40 p\) where \(p\) is price in dollars and \(q\) is the number of shirts. What quantity is sold at the current price of $$ 12 ?\( What profit is realized at this price? (c) Use the demand equation to write cost and revenue as functions of the price, \)p .$ Then write profit as a function of price. (d) Graph profit against price. Find the price that maximizes profits. What is this profit?

A business associate who owes you 3000 offers to pay you 2800 now, or else pay you three yearly installments of 1000 each, with the first installment paid now. If you use only financial reasons to make your decision, which option should you choose? Justify your answer, assuming a 6 \%$ interest rate per year, compounded continuously.

The functions in Problems \(17-20\) represent exponential growth or decay. What is the initial quantity? What is the growth rate? State if the growth rate is continuous. $$P=3.2 e^{0.03 t}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.