/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 23 Table 1.19 shows the total US la... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 23

Table 1.19 shows the total US labor force, \(L .\) Find the average rate of change between 1940 and \(2000 ;\) between 1940 and \(1960 ;\) between 1980 and \(2000 .\) Give units and interpret your answers in terms of the labor force. \(^{37}\) $$\begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c} \hline \text { Year } & 1940 & 1960 & 1980 & 2000 \\ \hline L & 47,520 & 65,778 & 99,303 & 136,891 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The average rates of change are 1,489.52 (1940-2000), 912.9 (1940-1960), and 1,879.4 (1980-2000) people per year.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Formula for Average Rate of Change

The average rate of change of a function between two points is given by the difference in function values divided by the difference in points. Mathematically, for points \((x_1, f(x_1))\) and \((x_2, f(x_2))\), the average rate of change is \(\frac{f(x_2) - f(x_1)}{x_2 - x_1}\). Here, \(x\) represents years and \(f(x)\) represents the labor force, \(L\).
02

Calculate Average Rate of Change (1940-2000)

Identify the values from the table for the years 1940 and 2000. Here, \(L_{1940} = 47,520\) and \(L_{2000} = 136,891\). The difference in years is \(2000 - 1940 = 60\). Calculate the rate as follows:\[ \frac{136,891 - 47,520}{2000 - 1940} = \frac{89,371}{60} \approx 1,489.52 \text{ people per year} \]
03

Calculate Average Rate of Change (1940-1960)

Use the table values for 1940 and 1960, \(L_{1940} = 47,520\) and \(L_{1960} = 65,778\). The time difference is \(1960 - 1940 = 20\). Calculate:\[ \frac{65,778 - 47,520}{1960 - 1940} = \frac{18,258}{20} = 912.9 \text{ people per year} \]
04

Calculate Average Rate of Change (1980-2000)

Consider the table data for 1980 and 2000, \(L_{1980} = 99,303\) and \(L_{2000} = 136,891\). The difference in years is \(2000 - 1980 = 20\). Calculate:\[ \frac{136,891 - 99,303}{2000 - 1980} = \frac{37,588}{20} = 1,879.4 \text{ people per year} \]
05

Interpretation of Results

Between 1940 and 2000, the labor force increased at an average rate of about 1,489.52 people per year. From 1940 to 1960, the rate was 912.9 people per year, while between 1980 and 2000, it increased to 1,879.4 people per year. This indicates a faster growth in the labor force in the latter period.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

US Labor Force
The US labor force consists of individuals aged 16 and over who are either working or actively seeking employment. It is a vital aspect of the national economy as it reflects the number of people available to contribute to production and services across the nation. The labor force is influenced by a variety of factors including population growth, economic conditions, and policy changes. During 1940 to 2000, the US labor force experienced significant change.
  • In 1940, the labor force stood at 47,520 thousand individuals.
  • By 2000, this number had increased to 136,891 thousand.
This growth can be attributed to several factors such as increases in population size, higher levels of female workforce participation, and economic expansions. Understanding the US labor force helps us to analyze economic health and predict future labor market trends.
Calculating Rates
Calculating the average rate of change is essential in understanding how quickly something is increasing or decreasing over time. In this context, we calculate the average rate of change of the US labor force over different time periods. The average rate of change formula is given by:\[\frac{f(x_2) - f(x_1)}{x_2 - x_1}\]Where:
  • \(f(x_1)\) and \(f(x_2)\) are the labor force values at two different years, \(x_1\) and \(x_2\).
  • \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) represent the years between which you are measuring the change.
For example, between 1940 and 2000, the average rate of change of the labor force was calculated to be 1,489.52 people per year. Each of these calculations follows the same method depending on the years in question, showing how the labor force grew over those specific periods.
Interpretation of Results
Interpreting the results helps to derive meaningful insights from raw data. When we analyze the average rate of change in the US labor force over different decades, the results tell us more than just numbers.
  • From 1940 to 1960, the labor force increased at an average rate of 912.9 people per year. This reflects changes post-World War II, when many entered the workforce.
  • Between 1980 and 2000, the labor force grew much faster at 1,879.4 people per year. This was a period of technological advancement and globalization, which opened up more jobs and opportunities.
These periods show not just how the workforce size changed, but they also highlight underlying socio-economic conditions. Understanding these trends can help policymakers and economists make informed decisions to support and sustain labor force growth.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If the world's population increased exponentially from 5.937 billion in 1998 to 6.771 billion in 2008 and continued to increase at the same percentage rate between 2008 and \(2012,\) calculate what the world's population would have been in \(2012 .\) How does this compare to the Population Reference Bureau estimate of 7.07 billion in July \(2012 ?^{5 x}\).

Determine whether each of the following tables of values could correspond to a linear function, an exponential function, or neither. For each table of values that could correspond to a linear or an exponential function, find a formula for the function. A. $$\begin{array}{c|c} \hline x & f(x) \\ \hline 0 & 10.5 \\ 1 & 12.7 \\ 2 & 18.9 \\ 3 & 36.7 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ B. $$\begin{array}{c|l} \hline t & s(t) \\ \hline-1 & 50.2 \\ 0 & 30.12 \\\ 1 & 18.072 \\ 2 & 10.8432 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ C. $$\begin{array}{c|c} \hline u & g(u) \\ \hline 0 & 27 \\ 2 & 24 \\ 4 & 21 \\ 6 & 18 \\ \hline \end{array}$$

For Problems \(1-16,\) solve for \(t\) using natural logarithms. $$40=100 e^{-0.03 t}$$

Allometry is the study of the relative size of different parts of a body as a consequence of growth. In this problem, you will check the accuracy of an allometric equation: the weight of a fish is proportional to the cube of its length. \(^{87}\) Table 1.40 relates the weight, \(y,\) in \(\mathrm{gm}\), of plaice (a type of fish) to its length, \(x,\) in \(\mathrm{cm} .\) Does this data support the hypothesis that (approximately) \(y=k x^{3} ?\) If so, estimate the constant of proportionality, \(k\) $$\begin{array}{r|r|r|r|r|r} \hline x & y & x & y & x & y \\ \hline 33.5 & 332 & 37.5 & 455 & 41.5 & 623 \\ 34.5 & 363 & 38.5 & 500 & 42.5 & 674 \\ 35.5 & 391 & 39.5 & 538 & 43.5 & 724 \\ 36.5 & 419 & 40.5 & 574 & & \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Sketch a possible graph of sales of sunscreen in the northeastern US over a 3 -year period, as a function of months since January 1 of the first year. Explain why your graph should be periodic. What is the period?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Statistics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation

Geometry

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.