/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Prove that every one-dimensional... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Prove that every one-dimensional proper scheme \(X\) over an algebraically closed field \(k\) is projective (a) If \(X\) is irreducible and nonsingular, then \(X\) is projective by (II, 6.7 ) (b) If \(X\) is integral, let \(\tilde{X}\) be its normalization (II, Ex. 3.8). Show that \(\tilde{X}\) is complete and nonsingular, hence projective by (a). Let \(f: \tilde{X} \rightarrow X\) be the projection. Let \(\mathscr{Q}\) be a very ample invertible sheaf on \(\tilde{X}\). Show there is an effective divisor \(D=\sum P_{i}\) on \(\tilde{X}\) with \(\mathscr{L}(D) \cong \mathscr{L},\) and such that \(f\left(P_{i}\right)\) is a nonsingular point of \(X,\) for each \(i .\) Conclude that there is an invertible sheaf \(\mathscr{L}_{0}\) on \(X\) with \(f^{*} \mathscr{L}_{0} \cong\) \(\mathscr{L} .\) Then use (Ex. \(5.7 \mathrm{d}\) ), (II, 7.6) and (II, 5.16.1) to show that \(X\) is projective. (c) If \(X\) is reduced, but not necessarily irreducible, let \(X_{1}, \ldots . . X_{r}\) be the irre. ducible components of \(X\). Use (Ex. 4.5 ) to show Pic \(X \rightarrow \oplus\) Pic \(X\) is sur jective. Then use (Ex. 5.7c) to show \(X\) is projective (d) Finally, if \(X\) is any one-dimensional proper scheme over \(k\), use ( 2.7 ) and (Ex. 4.6 ) to show that Pic \(X \rightarrow\) Pic \(X_{n d}\) is surjective. Then use (Ex. \(5.7 \mathrm{b}\) ) to show \(X\) is projective.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The exercise establishes that any one-dimensional proper scheme over an algebraically closed field is projective via four-step process: (a) projectivity for irreducible and nonsingular schema is proven directly by applying theorem (II,6.7), (b) projectivity for integral schema is demonstrated by finding an ample invertible sheaf and an effective divisor conforming to a set of given conditions, (c) for reduced but not necessarily irreducible schema, projectivity is shown using properties of the Picard group, and (d) finally, the projectivity of a general one-dimensional proper scheme is verified using surjective properties of the Picard group.

Step by step solution

01

Prove projectivity for irreducible and nonsingular schema

If \(X\) is irreducible and nonsingular, then apply (II,6.7) to show that \(X\) is projective.
02

Show projectivity for integral schema

Let \(\tilde{X}\) be the normalization of \(X\) (by referencing II, Ex. 3.8). Show that \(\tilde{X}\) is complete (wholly defined), and nonsingular (its local rings are discrete valuation rings), thus projective by the previous step. Let \(f: \tilde{X} \rightarrow X\) be the projection, and let \(\mathscr{Q}\) be a very ample invertible sheaf on \(\tilde{X}\). Show there is an effective divisor, \(D=\sum P_{i}\), on \(\tilde{X}\) such that \(\mathscr{L}(D) \cong \mathscr{L}\), and \(f\left(P_{i}\right)\) is a nonsingular point of \(X,\) for each \(i .\) Deduce that \(\mathscr{L}_{0}\) is an invertible sheaf on \(X\) with \(f^{*} \mathscr{L}_{0} \cong\) \(\mathscr{L}\). Then apply (Ex. \(5.7 \mathrm{d}\)), (II, 7.6), and (II, 5.16.1) to show that \(X\) is projective.
03

Verify projectivity for reduced schema

Let \(X_{1}, \ldots ., X_{r}\) be the irreducible components of \(X\). Using (Ex. 4.5 ) it can be shown that Pic \(X\) \(\rightarrow \oplus\) Pic \(X\) is surjective. Then apply (Ex. 5.7c) to conclude that \(X\) is projective when it is reduced, but not necessarily irreducible.
04

Affirm projectivity for a general one-dimensional proper scheme

If \(X\) is any one-dimensional proper scheme over \(k\), use (2.7) and (Ex. 4.6 ) to show that Pic \(X \rightarrow\) Pic \(X_{n d}\) is surjective. Then apply (Ex. \(5.7 \mathrm{b}\)) to affirm that \(X\) is projective.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Algebraically Closed Field
When delving into the world of algebraic geometry, an algebraically closed field is a fundamental concept. Simply put, a field is considered algebraically closed if every non-constant polynomial in one variable has at least one root in that field. For instance, the field of complex numbers is algebraically closed because every polynomial equation has a solution in the complex numbers, as stated by the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.

In the context of the projective scheme discussed in the exercise, the field k being algebraically closed ensures that certain algebraic properties hold, such as the existence of roots for polynomials, which is crucial when analyzing the properties of schemes defined over k. This concept sets a foundation for discussing the geometric structure of schemes and their various morphisms, which rely on the underlying properties of the field.
Normalization of Schemes
The notion of the normalization of schemes is somewhat analogous to the process of simplifying fractions in basic arithmetic; it is a process of making a scheme 'better-behaved' algebraically. Normalization typically involves taking a non-normal scheme, which may have singularities or other irregularities, and constructing a new scheme where these issues are resolved.

The normalized scheme, denoted as \( \tilde{X} \), is complete, meaning it has all its points 'filled in,' and nonsingular, implying that it does not contain any 'sharp corners' or 'crossing paths'. This process is crucial because nonsingular, complete schemes are easier to work with and often have better geometric and algebraic properties, such as being projective as shown in the exercise. Normalization is a key step in resolving singularities and studying the intrinsic properties of algebraic spaces.
Very Ample Invertible Sheaf
An essential tool in the algebraic geometer's toolkit is the very ample invertible sheaf. It is connected to the idea of embedding a scheme into projective space. A sheaf, in this context, is a mathematical object that systematically keeps track of algebraic information over a scheme. It's a bit like a function that assigns a set of values to every open subset of our scheme, following some glueing properties.

When we say a sheaf is invertible, it means that it has an inverse operation with respect to tensor product, similar to how an invertible matrix has an inverse with respect to matrix multiplication. A very ample sheaf allows us to find an embedding of our scheme into a projective space, which is ideally where we would like to have our scheme sit for various analytical benefits. In the exercise, the very ample invertible sheaf is used to establish the existence of an effective divisor, leading to the proof that the scheme is projective.
Picard Group
Last but not least is the Picard group. This concept may sound highly abstract when first encountered, but it's essentially like a ledger recording different ways to twist or tweak the scheme's geometry without changing its underlying space. Mathematically, the Picard group of a scheme X is the group of isomorphism classes of invertible sheaves, with the group operation being the tensor product.

Why is this group important? Because it describes various features of the scheme such as its divisors, and helps in classifying line bundles over X. A powerful aspect of the Picard group is its role in deducing the projectivity of a scheme, as seen in the exercise where the surjectivity of certain Picard group maps confirms the projectivity of the scheme. In algebraic geometry, the Picard group serves as a bridge between the purely algebraic data of line bundles and the rich geometry of the underlying space.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

On an arbitrary topological space \(X\) with an arbitrary abelian sheaf \(\mathscr{F},\) Cech cohomology may not give the same result as the derived functor cohomology. But here we show that for \(H^{1},\) there is an isomorphism if one takes the limit over all coverings. (a) Let \(\mathfrak{U}=\left(U_{i}\right)_{i e I}\) be an open covering of the topological space \(X\). A refinement of \(\mathbb{U}\) is a covering \(\mathfrak{B}=\left(V_{j}\right)_{\text {je } J}\), together with a \(\operatorname{map} \lambda: J \rightarrow I\) of the index sets, such that for each \(j \in J, V_{j} \subseteq U_{\lambda(j)} .\) If \(\mathfrak{B}\) is a refinement of \(\mathbb{U}\), show that there is a natural induced map on Cech cohomology, for any abelian sheaf \(\mathscr{F},\) and for each \(i\) \\[ \lambda^{i}: \check{H}^{i}(\mathbf{U}, \mathscr{F}) \rightarrow \check{H}^{i}(\mathfrak{Y}, \mathscr{F}) \\] The coverings of \(X\) form a partially ordered set under refinement, so we can consider the Cech cohomology in the limit \\[ \varliminf_{u} \check{H}^{i}(\mathfrak{U}, \mathscr{F}) \\] (b) For any abelian sheaf \(\mathscr{F}\) on \(X,\) show that the natural maps (4.4) for each covering \\[ \check{H}^{i}(\mathbf{u}, \mathscr{F}) \rightarrow H^{i}(X, \mathscr{F}) \\] are compatible with the refinement maps above (c) Now prove the following theorem. Let \(X\) be a topological space, \(\mathscr{F}\) a sheaf of abelian groups. Then the natural map \\[ \varliminf_{u} \check{H}^{1}(\mathfrak{U}, \mathscr{F}) \rightarrow H^{1}(X, \mathscr{F}) \\] is an isomorphism. [Hint: Embed \(\mathscr{F}\) in a flasque sheaf \(\mathscr{G},\) and let \(\mathscr{R}=\mathscr{G} / \mathscr{F}\) so that we have an exact sequence \\[ 0 \rightarrow \mathscr{F} \rightarrow \mathscr{G} \rightarrow \mathscr{R} \rightarrow 0 \\] Define a complex \(D^{\prime}(\mathbb{Z})\) by \\[ 0 \rightarrow C^{\prime}(\mathbf{U}, \mathscr{F}) \rightarrow C^{\prime}(\mathbf{U}, \mathscr{G}) \rightarrow D^{\prime}(\mathbf{U}) \rightarrow 0 \\] Then use the exact cohomology sequence of this sequence of complexes, and the natural map of complexes \\[ D^{\prime}(\mathfrak{U}) \rightarrow C^{\prime}(\mathfrak{U}, \mathscr{R}) \\] and see what happens under refinement.

Cohomological Interpretation of Depth. If \(A\) is a ring, a an ideal, and \(M\) an \(A\) module, then depth\(_{\mathrm{a}} M\) is the maximum length of an \(M\) -regular sequence \(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{r}\) with all \(x_{i} \in a .\) This generalizes the notion of depth introduced in (II, \(\S 8\) ). (a) Assume that \(A\) is noetherian. Show that if \(\operatorname{depth}_{\mathfrak{a}} M \geqslant 1,\) then \(\Gamma_{a}(M)=0\) and the converse is true if \(M\) is finitely generated. [Hint: When \(M\) is finitely generated, both conditions are equivalent to saying that \(a\) is not contained in any associated prime of \(M .]\) (b) Show inductively, for \(M\) finitely generated, that for any \(n \geqslant 0,\) the following conditions are equivalent: (i) \(\operatorname{depth}_{a} M \geqslant n\) (ii) \(H_{n}^{i}(M)=0\) for all \(i

(a) Let \(X=\mathbf{A}_{k}^{1}\) be the affine line over an infinite field \(k\). Let \(P . Q\) be distinct closed points of \(X,\) and let \(U=X-\left\\{P . Q ; \text { Show that } H^{1}\left(X . \mathbf{Z}_{l}\right) \neq 0\right.\) (b) More generally, let \(Y \subseteq X=\mathbf{A}_{k}^{n}\) be the union of \(n+1\) hyperplanes in suitably general position, and let \(U=X-Y .\) Show that \(H^{n}\left(X, \mathbf{Z}_{U}\right) \neq 0 .\) Thus the result of (2.7) is the best possible.

Let \(Y\) be an integral scheme of finite type over an algebraically closed field \(k\) Let \(\delta\) be a locally free sheaf on \(Y\), and let \(X=\mathbf{P}(\delta)-\) see (II, \(\$ 7\) ). Then show that Pic \(X \cong(\text { Pic } Y) \times \mathbf{Z} .\) This strengthens (II, Ex. 7.9)

Let \(X\) be a reduced noetherian scheme. Show that \(X\) is affine if and only if each irreducible component is affine.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.