/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Let \(f: X \rightarrow Y\) be a ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(f: X \rightarrow Y\) be a morphism of separated schemes of finite type over a noetherian scheme \(S\). Let \(Z\) be a closed subscheme of \(X\) which is proper over \(S\). Show that \(f(Z)\) is closed in \(Y,\) and that \(f(Z)\) with its image subscheme structure (Ex. \(3.11 d\) ) is proper over \(S .\) We refer to this result by saying that "the image of a proper scheme is proper." [Hint: Factor \(f\) into the graph morphism \(\Gamma_{f}: X \rightarrow X \times_{s} Y\) followed by the second projection \(\left.p_{2}, \text { and show that } \Gamma_{f} \text { is a closed immersion. }\right]\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The image \(f(Z)\) is closed in \(Y\), because it's the image of the closed subset \(\Gamma_{f}(Z)\) under the proper morphism \(p_{2}\). This, together with the fact that \(Z\) is proper over \(S\), shows that \(f(Z)\) is also a scheme proper over \(S\).

Step by step solution

01

Construct the graph morphism

According to the hint, start by constructing the graph morphism \(\Gamma_{f}: X \rightarrow X \times_{S} Y\). This is a morphism that takes a point \(x\) in \(X\) to the pair \((x, f(x))\) in \(X \times_{S} Y.\)
02

Show that the graph morphism is a closed immersion

Next, show that the graph morphism \(\Gamma_{f}\) is a closed immersion. This follows from the fact that \(f\) is a morphism of finite type and \(X\) and \(Y\) are separated over \(S\).
03

Show that the image of \(Z\) under \(f\) is closed in \(Y\)

To show that \(f(Z)\) is closed in \(Y\), notice that \(\Gamma_{f}(Z)\) is a closed subscheme of \(X \times_{S} Y\), because \(Z\) is a closed subscheme of \(X\). Then the image of \(\Gamma_{f}(Z)\) under the second projection \(p_{2}\) equals \(f(Z)\), and as the image of a closed set under a proper morphism is closed, \(f(Z)\) is closed in \(Y\).
04

Show that the image of \(Z\) under \(f\) is proper over \(S\)

Finally, to show that \(f(Z)\) is proper over \(S\), first note that \(f(Z)\) can be given the structure of a scheme by pulling back along the embedding \(f(Z) \hookrightarrow f(X) \subseteq Y\). As \(Z\) is proper over \(S\) and \(f\) is separated and of finite type, the image \(f(Z)\) is itself a scheme proper over \(S\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proper Morphism
A proper morphism is a fundamental concept in algebraic geometry. Imagine it as a way to ensure some "completeness" and "boundedness" properties similar to compactness in topology. It is defined as a separated morphism of finite type that is also universally closed, meaning the image of every closed set is closed.
If you consider a scheme morphism from a space that is proper, this morphism will map closed sets to closed sets. This is significant because it helps maintain certain structural properties that are necessary for further geometric or arithmetical considerations.
In the given exercise, since the morphism \(f\) is part of this setting, it becomes crucial for proving that \(f(Z)\) is closed and proper over \(S\). Recognizing this allows us to recognize when a scheme can be "nicely" mapped between settings without losing its key features.
  • Ensures images of closed sets remain closed.
  • Maintains structural integrity across mappings.
  • Necessary for complex geometric constructions.
Graph Morphism
A graph morphism, denoted as \(\Gamma_f\), plays a pivotal role in scheme morphisms. It captures the essence of how an image and pre-image interact under a function in the category of schemes. Imagine taking an element from your domain \(X\), and mapping it to a pair \((x, f(x))\) in the product space \(X \times_S Y\).
This construction creates a graphical "snapshot" of the function \(f\) in a new, more dimensional setting. In practice, forming this morphism is a helpful technique for tackling questions about image properties, such as those in our exercise.
  • Represents the relationship graphically in \(X \times_S Y\).
  • Aid in tracking how schemes map through a complex setting.
  • Foundational in proving properties like closedness through image mapping.
By examining this graph morphism, we gain a structured approach to test whether a morphism is a closed immersion, a key step in many proofs.
Closed Immersion
Closed immersion, when it occurs, is like embedding a subspace tightly within another, akin to inserting a piece into a puzzle perfectly. It means the image of the morphism is closed, and the morphism induces an isomorphism onto its image.
For example, in the solution, demonstrating that the graph morphism \(\Gamma_f\) is a closed immersion is crucial. It provides a method for showing the interrelationship between spaces or schemes in a precise and controlled manner.
  • Makes the image of a morphism a closed subset.
  • Ensures full embedding without distortion through an isomorphism.
  • Crucial for conclusions about image properties, such as closed and proper images.
This allows us to guarantee that the subscheme \(Z\) remains intact and its properties are preserved under mapping, setting the stage for the next steps of the proof.
Noetherian Scheme
Noetherian schemes are spaces where every descending chain of closed sets stabilizes, similar to having a finite basis for topology. This concept is directly linked to the finiteness conditions in algebraic geometry properties, which ensures that sets within the scheme behave nicely and finitely.
Key to understanding this is realizing that these schemes provide a significant structure for methods like those used in the exercise, particularly since they make working on properties like properness more feasible. They ensure that you don't have infinitely nesting closed sets, which could complicate matters.
  • Limited, finite structure - finite number of open sets.
  • Facilitates orderly and manageable geometric operations.
  • Underpins much of classical algebraic geometric work.
In the exercise at hand, knowing that the scheme \(S\) is Noetherian gives a vital contextual foundation to apply finite type and separatedness concepts effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A Complete Nonprojective Variety. Let \(k\) be an algebraically closed field of char \(\neq 2 .\) Let \(C \subseteq \mathbf{P}_{k}^{2}\) be the nodal cubic curve \(y^{2} z=x^{3}+x^{2} z .\) If \(P_{0}=(0,0,1)\) is the singular point, then \(C-P_{0}\) is isomorphic to the multiplicative group \(\mathbf{G}_{m}=\operatorname{Spec} k\left[t, t^{-1}\right](\mathrm{E} \mathrm{x} .6 .7) .\) For each \(a \in k, a \neq 0,\) consider the translation of \(\mathbf{G}_{m}\) given by \(t \mapsto a t .\) This induces an automorphism of \(C\) which we denote by \(\varphi_{a}\) Now consider \(C \times\left(\mathbf{P}^{1}-\\{0\\}\right)\) and \(C \times\left(\mathbf{P}^{1}-\\{\infty\\}\right) .\) We glue their open subsets \(C \times\left(\mathbf{P}^{1}-\\{0, x\\}\right)\) by the isomorphism \(\varphi:\langle P, u\rangle \mapsto\left\langle\varphi_{u}(P), u\right\rangle\) for \(P \in C, u \in \mathbf{G}_{m}=\mathbf{P}^{1}-\\{0, x\\} .\) Thus we obtain a scheme \(X,\) which is our example. The projections to the second factor are compatible with \(\varphi,\) so there is a natural morphism \(\pi: X \rightarrow \mathbf{P}^{1}\) (a) Show that \(\pi\) is a proper morphism, and hence that \(X\) is a complete variety over \(k\) (b) Use the method of \((\text { Ex. } 6.9)\) to show that \(\operatorname{Pic}\left(C \times \mathbf{A}^{1}\right) \cong \mathbf{G}_{m} \times \mathbf{Z}\) and \(\operatorname{Pic}\left(C \times\left(\mathbf{A}^{1}-\\{0\\}\right)\right) \cong \mathbf{G}_{m} \times \mathbf{Z} \times \mathbf{Z}\) [Hint: If \(A\) is a domain and if denotes the group of units, then \(\left.(A[u])^{*} \cong A^{*} \text { and }\left(A\left[u, u^{-1}\right]\right)^{*} \cong A^{*} \times \mathbf{Z} .\right]\) (c) Now show that the restriction map \(\operatorname{Pic}\left(C \times \mathbf{A}^{1}\right) \rightarrow \operatorname{Pic}\left(C \times\left(\mathbf{A}^{1}-\\{0\\}\right)\right)\) is of the form \(\langle t, n\rangle \mapsto\langle t, 0 . n\rangle,\) and that the automorphism \(\varphi\) of \(C \times\left(\mathbf{A}^{1}-\\{0\\}\right)\) induces a map of the form \(\langle t, d, n\rangle \mapsto\langle t, d+n, n\rangle\) on its Picard group. (d) Conclude that the image of the restriction map Pic \(X \rightarrow \operatorname{Pic}(C \times\\{0\\})\) consists entirely of divisors of degree 0 on \(C .\) Hence \(X\) is not projective over \(k\) and \(\pi\) is not a projective morphism.

(a) Let \(\varphi: \overline{\mathscr{H}} \rightarrow \mathscr{G}\) be a morphism of sheaves on \(X\). Show that \(\varphi\) is surjective if and only if the following condition holds: for every open set \(U \subseteq X,\) and for everys \(\in \mathscr{G}(L)\), there is a covering \(\left\\{U_{i} \text { ; of } U \text { , and there are elements } t_{i} \in \mathscr{F}\left(U_{i}\right)\right.\) such that \(\varphi\left(t_{1}\right)=>\left.\right|_{l},\) for all \(i\) (b) Give an example of a surjective morphism of sheaves \(\varphi: \mathscr{F} \rightarrow \mathscr{S},\) and an open set \(U\) such that \(\varphi(U): \mathscr{F}(U) \rightarrow \mathscr{G}(U)\) is not surjective.

Let \(A\) be a ring. Show that the following conditions are equivalent: (i) Spec \(A\) is disconnected : (ii) there exist nonzero elements \(e_{1}, e_{2} \in A\) such that \(e_{1} e_{2}=0, e_{1}^{2}=e_{1}, e_{2}^{2}=e_{2}\) \(e_{1}+e_{2}=1\) (these elements are called orthogonal idempotents): (iii) \(A\) is isomorphic to a direct product \(A_{1} \times A_{2}\) of two nonzero rings.

(a) Let \(X\) be a scheme over a scheme \(Y\), and let \(\mathscr{L}, \mathscr{M}\) be two very ample invertible sheaves on \(X .\) Show that \(\mathscr{L} \otimes \mathscr{M}\) is also very ample. [Hint: Use a Segre embedding. \(]\) (b) Let \(f: X \rightarrow Y\) and \(g: Y \rightarrow Z\) be two morphisms of schemes. Let \(\mathscr{L}\) be a very ample invertible sheaf on \(X\) relative to \(Y\), and let \(\mathscr{M}\) be a very ample invertible sheaf on \(Y\) relative to \(Z\). Show that \(\mathscr{L} \otimes f^{*} . \mathscr{M}\) is a very ample invertible sheaf on \(X\) relative to \(Z\).

Again let \(X\) be a noetherian scheme, and \(\mathscr{F}\) a coherent sheaf on \(X .\) We will consider the function \\[ \varphi(x)=\operatorname{dim}_{k(x)} \mathscr{F}_{x} \otimes_{\sigma_{x}} k(x) \\] where \(k(x)=O_{x} / m_{x}\) is the residue field at the point \(x .\) Use Nakayama's lemma to prove the following results. (a) The function \(\varphi\) is upper semi-continuous, i.e., for any \(n \in \mathbf{Z},\) the set \(\\{x \in X | \varphi(x) \geqslant n\\}\) is closed. (b) If \(\mathscr{F}\) is locally free, and \(X\) is connected, then \(\varphi\) is a constant function. (c) Conversely, if \(X\) is reduced, and \(\varphi\) is constant, then \(\mathscr{F}\) is locally free.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.