/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 Exer. 1-26: Prove that the state... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exer. 1-26: Prove that the statement is true for every positive integer \(n\). $$ n<2^{n} $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The statement is true for all positive integers by induction.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Base Case

We begin by proving the base case for the smallest positive integer, which is often \(n = 1\). Substitute \(n = 1\) into the inequality to verify: \(1 < 2^{1}\). Calculating this gives us \(1 < 2\), which is true.
02

Establishing the Inductive Hypothesis

Assume that the statement \(n < 2^n\) holds true for some positive integer \(k\), such that \(k < 2^k\). This assumption is called the inductive hypothesis.
03

Proving the Inductive Step

Using the inductive hypothesis \(k < 2^k\), we need to prove that it holds true for \(k + 1\) as well, i.e., \(k+1 < 2^{k+1}\). Start by expressing \(2^{k+1}\) as \(2\times2^k\).
04

Demonstrating the Inductive Step

From the inductive hypothesis, we know \(k < 2^k\). Therefore, \(k+1 \leq k + 1< 2^k + 2^k = 2\times2^k = 2^{k+1}\). Hence, \(k+1 < 2^{k+1}\) is true.
05

Conclusion

Since the base case is true and the statement holds for \(k+1\) assuming it holds for \(k\), by mathematical induction, the statement \(n < 2^n\) is true for every positive integer \(n\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Inequalities
Inequalities are mathematical expressions showing the relationship between two values, where one is larger or smaller than the other. They are represented by signs such as \(<\), \(>\), \(\leq\), and \(\geq\). In our specific exercise, the inequality \(n < 2^{n}\) is to be proven true for every positive integer \(n\). This particular expression highlights that the powers of 2 increase more rapidly than linear growth, represented by \(n\).
  • The inequality tells us that as \(n\) grows, \(2^n\) grows much faster. This is fundamental in understanding why the statement holds true as \(n\) becomes larger.
  • Inequalities enable us to compare different functions or numbers in terms of their size, which is crucial in various fields like optimization and analysis.
Recognizing when and how to use inequalities can greatly help in solving math problems effectively.
Base Case
The base case is the foundation of a mathematical induction proof. It is the initial step where we show the statement is true for the smallest possible value, typically \(n = 1\). For this inequality, substituting \(n = 1\) verifies it as \(1 < 2^1\) or \(1 < 2\), which is indeed true.
  • Establishing the base case ensures that the statement holds at least for the beginning number, providing a starting point for our logical chain.
  • Without a valid base case, the induction process cannot properly demonstrate the truth of the statement for all subsequent values.
Ensuring the base case is correct is crucial as it paves the way for assuming the statement holds for all integers greater than the base case.
Inductive Hypothesis
The inductive hypothesis is a key component in the method of induction. It involves assuming that a statement, like our inequality \(n < 2^n\), is true for some positive integer \(k\). This assumption is not a conclusion but a step in building our overall proof structure.
  • By assuming the statement is true for \(k\), we can use this as a stepping stone to show it is also true for \(k + 1\).
  • This logical assumption effectively allows us to "bridge the gap" between the base case and demonstrating the statement's truth for all natural numbers.
The inductive hypothesis helps create a scenario where we can extend our assumption incrementally from \(k\) to \(k+1\), helping solidify the entire proof.
Inductive Step
The inductive step is where we apply our inductive hypothesis to prove that if the statement holds for a particular number \(k\), then it must also hold for \(k + 1\). In this exercise, we use the hypothesis \(k < 2^k\) to show that \(k + 1 < 2^{k+1}\).
  • We begin by expressing \(2^{k+1}\) as \(2 \times 2^k\).
  • From the inductive hypothesis, we have \(k < 2^k\), allowing us to state \(k + 1 < k + 2^k\), which further simplifies to \(k + 1 < 2^{k+1}\).
The inductive step is critical as it conclusively shows that our base assumption holds true through an indefinite sequence of numbers, specifically for each subsequent value after the base case. This seamless transition ensures that the initial truth established at the base is perpetuated to all positive integers.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Simplify the expression using the binomial theorem. $$ \frac{(x+h)^{5}-x^{5}}{h} $$

Letter and number experiment An experiment consists of selecting a letter from the alphabet and one of the digits 0 , \(1, \ldots, 9\). (a) Describe the sample space \(S\) of the experiment, and find \(n(S)\). (b) Suppose the letters of the alphabet are assigned numbers as follows: \(A=1, B=2, \ldots, Z=26\). Let \(E_{1}\) be the event in which the units digit of the number assigned to the letter of the alphabet is the same as the digit selected. Find \(n\left(E_{1}\right), n\left(E_{1}^{\prime}\right)\), and \(P\left(E_{1}\right)\). (c) Let \(E_{2}\) be the event that the letter is one of the five vowels and \(E_{3}\) the event that the digit is a prime number. Are \(E_{2}\) and \(E_{3}\) mutually exclusive? Are they independent? Find \(P\left(E_{2}\right), P\left(E_{3}\right), P\left(E_{2} \cap E_{3}\right)\), and \(P\left(E_{2} \cup E_{3}\right)\). (d) Let \(E_{4}\) be the event that the numerical value of the letter is even. Are \(E_{2}\) and \(E_{4}\) mutually exclusive? Are they independent? Find \(P\left(E_{2} \cap E_{4}\right)\) and \(P\left(E_{2} \cup E_{4}\right)\).

Find the \(n\)th term, the fifth term, and the eighth term of the geometric sequence. $$1,-x^{2}, x^{4},-x^{6}, \ldots$$

Roulette In the American version of roulette, a ball is spun around a wheel and has an equal chance of landing in any one of 38 slots numbered \(0,00,1,2, \ldots, 36\). Shown in the figure is a standard betting layout for roulette, where the color of the oval corresponds to the color of the slot on the wheel. Find the probability that the ball lands (a) in a black slot (b) in a black slot twice in succession

Card and die experiment Each suit in a deck is made up of an ace (A), nine numbered cards \((2,3, \ldots, 10)\), and three face cards (J, Q, K). An experiment consists of drawing a single card from a deck followed by rolling a single die. (a) Describe the sample space \(S\) of the experiment, and find \(n(S)\). (b) Let \(E_{1}\) be the event consisting of the outcomes in which a numbered card is drawn and the number of dots on the die is the same as the number on the card. Find \(n\left(E_{1}\right), n\left(E_{1}^{\prime}\right)\), and \(P\left(E_{1}\right)\). (c) Let \(E_{2}\) be the event in which the card drawn is a face card, and let \(E_{3}\) be the event in which the number of dots on the die is even. Are \(E_{2}\) and \(E_{3}\) mutually exclusive? Are they independent? Find \(P\left(E_{2}\right), P\left(E_{3}\right)\), \(P\left(E_{2} \cap E_{3}\right)\), and \(P\left(E_{2} \cup E_{3}\right)\). (d) Are \(E_{1}\) and \(E_{2}\) mutually exclusive? Are they independent? Find \(P\left(E_{1} \cap E_{2}\right)\) and \(P\left(E_{1} \cup E_{2}\right)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.