/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 Use the Principle of Mathematica... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the Principle of Mathematical Induction to show that the given statement is true for all natural numbers \(n\). $$ -2-3-4-\cdots-(n+1)=-\frac{1}{2} n(n+3) $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The statement is true for all natural numbers by mathematical induction.

Step by step solution

01

Base Case

First, verify the statement for the initial value of the natural numbers, which is usually 1:For $$n = 1$$,$$-2 = -\frac{1}{2} \cdot 1 \cdot (1+3) = -\frac{1}{2} \cdot 1 \cdot 4 = -2$$. Thus, the base case holds true.
02

Induction Hypothesis

Assume the statement is true for some natural number $$k$$. That means,$$-2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) = -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3)$$.This assumption is called the induction hypothesis.
03

Inductive Step

Prove that the statement holds for the next natural number $$k+1$$. We need to show that: $$ -2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) - (k+2) = -\frac{1}{2} (k+1) ((k+1)+3). $$From the induction hypothesis,$$ -2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) = -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3).$$Now, consider the sum up to term $$(k+2)$$:$$ -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) - (k+2). $$
04

Algebraic Simplification

Simplify the expression $$ -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) - (k+2)$$:$$ -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) - (k+2) = -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) - \frac{2(k+2)}{2} = -\frac{1}{2} (k (k+3) + 2(k+2)) $$Combine and simplify inside the parenthesis:$$ -\frac{1}{2} (k^2 + 3k + 2k + 4) = -\frac{1}{2} (k+1) (k+4). $$Hence,$$ -2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) - (k+2) = -\frac{1}{2} (k+1) (k+4). $$
05

Conclusion

The statement is found to be true for $$k+1$$, provided it is true for $$k$$. Since the base case holds and the inductive step has been verified, by the principle of mathematical induction, the given statement is true for all natural numbers $$n$$.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Base Case
In mathematical induction, the base case is the initial step. This is where we prove the given statement for the first value in our domain, typically, this is when \(n = 1\). The base case establishes a foundation upon which the induction process builds.
In our exercise, for \( n = 1 \):
$$ -2 = -\frac{1}{2} \times 1 \times (1+3) = -\frac{1}{2} \times 1 \times 4 = -2 $$.
Since both sides of the equation match, the base case holds true. This confirmation is crucial because if the base case failed, the entire induction process would fail.
Induction Hypothesis
The induction hypothesis is the second step in mathematical induction and involves assuming the statement is true for some arbitrary natural number, say, \( k \). This assumption allows us to move forward with our inductive step.
For our exercise, we assume:
$$ -2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) = -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) $$.
It's important to note the induction hypothesis is not a proof by itself, but a necessary step to facilitate the inductive step.
Inductive Step
In the inductive step, we aim to show that if the statement holds for \( k \), then it must also hold for \( k + 1 \). This is the core step that validates our assumption in the induction hypothesis.
Using our exercise, we need to prove:
$$ -2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) - (k+2) = -\frac{1}{2} (k+1) ((k+1)+3) $$.
From our induction hypothesis, we have:
$$ -2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) = -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) $$.
To include the next term \( (k+2) \), we add \( -(k+2) \) to both sides, giving us:
$$ -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) - (k+2) $$.
Algebraic Simplification
Once we have set up our inductive step, algebraic simplification is necessary to complete the proof and show the statement holds for \( k + 1 \).
In our exercise, we simplify:
$$ -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) - (k+2) $$.
First, express \( (k+2) \) as \( -\frac{2(k+2)}{2} \) to combine like terms:
$$ -\frac{1}{2} k (k+3) - \frac{2(k+2)}{2} = -\frac{1}{2} (k (k+3) + 2(k+2)). $$.
By combining terms inside the parenthesis, we get:
$$ -\frac{1}{2} (k^2 + 3k + 2k + 4) = -\frac{1}{2} (k+1) (k+4). $$.
Therefore, we have shown that:
$$ -2 - 3 - 4 - \cdots - (k+1) - (k+2) = -\frac{1}{2} (k+1) (k+4). $$
This completes our induction proof and validates the statement for all natural numbers \(n\).

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Triangular Numbers A triangular number is a term of the sequence $$ u_{1}=1 \quad u_{n+1}=u_{n}+(n+1) $$ List the first seven triangular numbers.

Determine whether each infinite geometric series converges or diverges. If it converges, find its sum. $$ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} 6\left(-\frac{2}{3}\right)^{k-1} $$

Droste Effect The Droste Effect, named after the image on boxes of Droste cocoa powder, refers to an image that contains within it a smaller version of the image, which in turn contains an even smaller version, and so on. If each version of the image is \(\frac{1}{5}\) the height of the previous version, the height of the \(n\) th version is given by \(a_{n}=\frac{1}{5} a_{n-1}\). Suppose a Droste image on a package has a height of 4 inches. How tall would the image be in the 6 th version?

You are interviewing for a job and receive two offers for a five-year contract: A: \(\$ 40,000\) to start, with guaranteed annual increases of \(6 \%\) for the first 5 years B: \(\$ 44,000\) to start, with guaranteed annual increases of \(3 \%\) for the first 5 years Which offer is better if your goal is to be making as much as possible after 5 years? Which is better if your goal is to make as much money as possible over the contract (5 years)?

Bode's Law In \(1772,\) Johann Bode published the following formula for predicting the mean distances, in astronomical units (AU), of the planets from the sun: $$ a_{1}=0.4 \quad a_{n}=0.4+0.3 \cdot 2^{n-2} $$ where \(n \geq 2\) is the number of the planet from the sun. (a) Determine the first eight terms of the sequence. (b) At the time of Bode's publication, the known planets were Mercury \((0.39 \mathrm{AU}),\) Venus \((0.72 \mathrm{AU}),\) Earth \((1 \mathrm{AU})\) Mars \((1.52 \mathrm{AU}),\) Jupiter \((5.20 \mathrm{AU}),\) and Saturn \((9.54 \mathrm{AU})\) How do the actual distances compare to the terms of the sequence? (c) The planet Uranus was discovered in \(1781,\) and the asteroid Ceres was discovered in \(1801 .\) The mean orbital distances from the sun to Uranus and Ceres " are \(19.2 \mathrm{AU}\) and \(2.77 \mathrm{AU},\) respectively. How well do these values fit within the sequence? (d) Determine the ninth and tenth terms of Bode's sequence. (e) The planets Neptune and Pluto" were discovered in 1846 and \(1930,\) respectively. Their mean orbital distances from the sun are \(30.07 \mathrm{AU}\) and \(39.44 \mathrm{AU},\) respectively. How do these actual distances compare to the terms of the sequence? (f) On July \(29,2005,\) NASA announced the discovery of a dwarf planet \((n=11),\) which has been named Eris. Use Bode's Law to predict the mean orbital distance of Eris from the sun. Its actual mean distance is not yet known, but Eris is currently about 97 astronomical units from the sun.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.