/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 38 Let \(a \neq 0, \neq \pm 1\) be ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(a \neq 0, \neq \pm 1\) be a square-free integer. For each prime number \(p\), let \(K_{p}\) be the splitting field of the polynomial \(X^{\prime}-a\) over Q. Show that \(\left[K_{p}: \mathbf{Q}\right]=p(p-1)\). For each square-free integer \(m>0\), let $$ K_{m}=\prod_{p \mid m} K_{p} $$ be the compositum of all fields \(K_{e}\) for \(p \mid m\). Let \(d_{m}=\left[K_{m}: Q\right]\) be the degree of \(K_{m}\) over Q. Show that if \(m\) is odd then \(d_{m}=\prod_{p \mid m} d_{p}\), and if \(m\) is even, \(m=2 n\) then \(d_{2 n}=d_{n}\) or \(2 d_{n}\) according as \(\sqrt{a}\) is or is not in the field of \(m\) -th roots of unity \(Q\left(\zeta_{m}\right)\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
In summary, we have shown that for any prime number \(p\), \(\left[K_{p}: \mathbf{Q}\right]=p(p-1)\). For odd square-free integers \(m > 0\), we established that \(d_m=\prod_{p \mid m}d_{p}\). For even square-free integers \(m=2n\), we showed that \(d_{2n}=d_n\) or \(2d_n\), depending whether \(\sqrt{a}\) is or isn't included in the field of \(m\)-th roots of unity \(\mathbf{Q}\left(\zeta_{m}\right)\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculating \(K_p\) and \(\left[K_{p}:\mathbf{Q}\right]\)

First, we need to find the splitting field of the polynomial, \(X^{\prime}-a\) for any given prime number \(p\). Note that the polynomial factors as \((X^\prime - a) = X^p - a = (X - a^\frac{1}{p})(X^2 + aX^\frac{p-1}{p} + a^2X^\frac{p-2}{p} + \cdots + a^{p-1})\). Due to the factors' irreducibility, this factorization must hold in any field extension containing all of these roots. This means that the splitting field \(K_p\) must contain these roots of the polynomial. Therefore, \(K_p = \mathbf{Q}\left(a^\frac{1}{p}, \zeta_{p}, \zeta_{p}^2, \cdots , \zeta_{p}^{p-1}\right)\), where \(\zeta_{p}\) is a primitive \(p\)-th root of unity. Now, let's calculate the degree of this extension, \(\left[K_{p}: \mathbf{Q}\right]\).
02

Finding \([K_p : \mathbf{Q}]\)

Recall that the degree of a field extension is the dimension of its vector space over the base field. Since \(\mathbf{Q}\) is linearly independent over the roots in \(K_p\), we can find the degree of the extension by identifying the dimension of the smallest vector space containing these roots. Pairwise multiply the powers of each \(\zeta_{p}^k\) for \(0 \leq k \leq p-1\) with the basis \(\left\{a^\frac{1}{p}\right\}\), yielding a set of \(p(p-1)\) linearly independent elements in the extension field. Hence, we have \(\left[K_{p}: \mathbf{Q}\right]=p(p-1)\).
03

Defining \(K_m\) and its degree \(d_m\)

Now we define the compositum \(K_m\) as \(K_{m}=\prod_{p \mid m} K_{p}\). We want to find its degree \(d_m=[K_m : \mathbf{Q}]\).
04

Finding \(d_{m}\) for odd \(m\)

If \(m\) is odd, we claim that \(d_m = \prod_{p \mid m} d_{p}\). Recall that for any two field extensions \(K\) and \(L\) over a field \(F\), if \(K \cap L = F\), then \([KL:F] = [K:F][L:F]\). In our case, for any distinct primes \(p\) and \(q\) dividing \(m\), we have \(K_p \cap K_q = \mathbf{Q}\), as they are both linearly independent due to the roots contained in each field. Since each \(K_p\) is a subfield of \(K_m\), the claim holds.
05

Finding \(d_{2n}\)

If \(m\) is even, we can write it as \(m = 2n\). Now, we need to show that \(d_{2n} = d_{n}\) or \(2d_{n}\), depending on whether \(\sqrt{a}\) is or is not in the field of \(m\)-th roots of unity \(\mathbf{Q}\left(\zeta_{m}\right)\). If \(\sqrt{a} \in \mathbf{Q}\left(\zeta_{m}\right)\), then the field \(\mathbf{Q}\left(\zeta_{m}\right)\) contains all the necessary primitive roots of unity to obtain extensions \(K_{2^n}\). Since \(\sqrt{a}\) is a square root of \(a\), the degree of the smallest such extension is equal to the degree of the smallest extension for the odd case, i.e., \(d_{2n} = d_{n}\). On the other hand, if \(\sqrt{a} \notin \mathbf{Q}\left(\zeta_{m}\right)\), then we need to consider the compositum of \(K_m\) and the smallest field extension containing \(\sqrt{a}\), i.e., \(K_{2n} = K_{m} \prod \mathbf{Q}\left(\sqrt{a}\right)\). Since \([\mathbf{Q}\left(\sqrt{a}\right) : \mathbf{Q}] = 2\) and the fields are linearly independent, we have \(d_{2n} = 2d_{n}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Splitting Field
A splitting field is a concept from field theory, a branch of abstract algebra. It refers to the smallest field extension in which a given polynomial splits into linear factors. Essentially, this means every root of the polynomial is contained within this extension field.

The importance of a splitting field lies in its efficiency; it contains exactly what is necessary for the polynomial to be completely factored, without any extra elements. In the context of the exercise, the polynomial presented is of the form \(X^p - a\), where \(a\) is a square-free integer and \(p\) is a prime. To form the splitting field for this polynomial, we need a field where all roots (including each component of factorization) are present.
  • The roots of \(X^p - a\) are contained in the field with the fractional power of \(a^{\frac{1}{p}}\).
  • This field also needs to include primitive roots of unity, such as \(\zeta_{p}\), to account for all roots involved.
  • Thus, the splitting field, \(K_p\), is built from the rational numbers \(\mathbf{Q}\) extended by joining the element \(a^{\frac{1}{p}}\) and the primitive \(p\)-th roots of unity.
In this scenario, \(K_p = \mathbf{Q}(a^{\frac{1}{p}}, \zeta_p)\).
Degree of Extension
The degree of a field extension denotes the size of the extended field as a vector space over the original, or base, field. This is a fundamental measurement in field theory, indicating how many times larger the extension field is compared to the original field.

When determining the degree of the field extension \([K_p : \mathbf{Q}]\), this value describes how many independent vectors (or elements, in this context) are required to represent the entire extension field \(K_p\) over \(\mathbf{Q}\). For \(X^p - a\), each power of the root \(\zeta_p^k\) multiplies with \(a^{\frac{1}{p}}\), leading to \(p\) different linear combinations.
  • The introduced roots by \(\zeta_p\) contribute \(p-1\) terms to this set.
  • We've established the degree of \(K_p\) over \(\mathbf{Q}\) to be \(p(p-1)\), correlating to the \(p\) primitive \(p\)-th roots and their interactions with these new components.
This degree reflects through countless algebraic computations and is essential for understanding the structure of relations within polynomial roots in advanced mathematics.
Primitive Roots of Unity
Primitive roots of unity are crucial elements in forming field extensions, especially when dealing with cyclotomic fields, polynomial factorization, and Fourier analysis in mathematics.

A \(n\)-th primitive root of unity is a complex number \(\zeta_n\) such that \(\zeta_n^n = 1\) and no lower positive power satisfies \(\zeta_n^k = 1\). These roots are essential because:
  • They help facilitate the breaking down of polynomials into simpler factors within splitting fields.
  • In algebra, they enable simpler resolution of equations like \(X^p = a\) by accounting for potential complex factors.
  • Each primitive root integrates into the field extension needed for polynomial solution, as in our splitting field \(K_p = \mathbf{Q}(a^{\frac{1}{p}}, \zeta_p)\).
Primitive roots, as part of cyclic groups in a complex number circle, complete the requisite portions of the field extension necessary for the polynomial to "split" completely within the given field extension.
Square-free Integers
A square-free integer is a natural number that is not divisible by any perfect square other than 1. In simpler terms, a square-free number contains no repeated factors. For example, 15 is square-free because its prime factorization is 3 × 5, free from squares like 4 or 9.

Square-free integers play a significant role in our exercise since \(a\) is described as square-free. This condition impacts the formation and complexity of field extensions. Since \(a\) is square-free and part of our polynomial, it ensures simplicity in factorization within the derived fields,
  • This prevents unnecessary complexity due to repeated roots or irreducible quadratic forms, which would arise from squared factors.
  • Maintaining \(a\) as square-free supports the uniqueness of the roots crucial for efficient splitting field creation.
  • It simplifies calculations and analysis of the polynomial's properties across different field extensions.
In number theory and algebra, using square-free integers often ensures clarity and efficiency, particularly in polynomial factorization and manipulation in fields.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Prove that given a symmetric group \(S_{n}\), there exists a polynomial \(f(X) \in \mathbf{Z}[X]\) with leading coefficient 1 whose Galois group over \(\mathbf{Q}\) is \(S_{n}\). [Hint: Reducing mod \(2,3,5\), show that there exists a polynomial whose reductions are such that the Galois group contains enough cycles to generate \(S_{n^{-}}\) Use the Chinese remainder theorem, also to be able to apply Eisenstein's criterion.]

Let \(k\) be a finite field with \(q\) elements. Let \(K=k(X)\) be the rational field in one variable. Let \(G\) be the group of automorphisms of \(K\) obtained by the mappings $$ X \mapsto \frac{a X+b}{c X+d} $$ with \(a, b, c, d\) in \(k\) and \(a d-b c \neq 0\). Prove the following statements: (a) The order of \(G\) is \(q^{3}-q\). (b) The fixed field of \(G\) is equal to \(k(Y)\) where $$ Y=\frac{\left(X^{\psi^{2}}-X\right)^{e+1}}{\left(X^{q}-X\right)^{q^{2}+1}} $$ (c) Let \(H_{1}\) be the subgroup of \(G\) consisting of the mappings \(X \mapsto a X+b\) with \(a \neq 0 .\) The fixed field of \(H_{1}\) is \(k(T)\) where \(T=\left(X^{4}-X\right)^{e-1}\) (d) Let \(H_{2}\) be the subgroup of \(H_{1}\) consisting of the mappings \(X \rightarrow X+b\) with \(b \in k .\) The fixed field of \(H_{2}\) is equal to \(k(Z)\) where \(Z=X^{4}-X\).

(a) Let \(k\) be a field of characteristic \(\chi 2 n\), for some odd integer \(n \geq 1\), and let \(\zeta\) be a primitive \(n-\) th root of unity, in \(k .\) Show that \(k\) also contains a primitive \(2 n\) -th root of unity. (b) Let \(k\) be a finite extension of the rationals. Show that there is only a finite number of roots of unity in \(k\).

Find the Galois groups over \(Q\) of the following polynomials. (a) \(X^{3}+X+1\) (b) \(X^{3}-X+1\) (g) \(X^{3}+X^{2}-2 X-1\) (c) \(x^{3}+2 X+1\) (d) \(X^{3}-2 X+1\) (c) \(X^{3}-X-1\) (f) \(X^{3}-12 X+8\)

Let \(E\) be a finite separable extension of \(k\), of degree \(n\). Let \(W=\left(w_{1}, \ldots, w_{n}\right)\) be elements of \(E\). Let \(\sigma_{1}, \ldots, \sigma_{n}\) be the distinct embeddings of \(E\) in \(k^{a}\) over \(k\). Define the discriminant of \(W\) to be $$ D_{E / k}(W)=\operatorname{det}\left(\sigma_{i} w_{j}\right)^{2} $$ Prove: (a) If \(V=\left(v_{1}, \ldots, v_{n}\right)\) is another set of elements of \(E\) and \(C=\left(c_{i j}\right)\) is a matrix of elements of \(k\) such that \(w_{i}=\sum c_{i j} v_{j}\), then $$ D_{E k}(W)=\operatorname{det}(C)^{2} D_{E / k}(V) $$ (b) The discriminant is an element of \(k\) (c) Let \(E=k(\alpha)\) and let \(f(X)=\operatorname{Irr}(\alpha, k, X)\). Let \(\alpha_{1}, \ldots, \alpha_{n}\) be the roots of \(f\) and say \(\alpha=\alpha_{1}\). Then $$ f^{\prime}(\alpha)=\prod_{j=2}^{n}\left(\alpha-\alpha_{j}\right) $$ Show that $$ D_{E / \lambda}\left(1, \alpha, \ldots, \alpha^{n-1}\right)=(-1)^{m i n-1 W^{2}} N_{k}^{\xi}\left(f^{\prime}(\alpha)\right) $$ (d) Let the notation be as in (a). Show that det( \(\left(\operatorname{Tr}\left(w_{i} w_{j}\right)\right)=\left(\operatorname{det}\left(\sigma_{i} w_{j}\right)\right)^{2}\). [Hint: Let \(A\) be the matrix \(\left(\sigma_{i} w_{j}\right)\). Show that ' \(A A\) is the matrix \(\left(\operatorname{Tr}\left(w_{i} w_{j}\right)\right)\).]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.