/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 22 Let \(F=\mathbf{F}_{p}\) be the ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(F=\mathbf{F}_{p}\) be the prime field of characteristic \(p .\) Let \(K\) be the field obtained from \(F\) by adjoining all primitive \(l\) -th roots of unity, for all prime numbers \(l \neq p\). Prove that \(K\) is algebraically closed. [Hint: Show that if \(q\) is a prime number, and \(r\) an integer \(\geqq 1\), there exists a prime \(l\) such that the period of \(p \bmod l\) is \(q^{r}\), by using the following old trick of Van der Waerden: Let \(l\) be a prime dividing the number $$ b=\frac{p^{r}-1}{p^{r^{-1}}-1}=\left(p^{\boldsymbol{r}^{-1}}-1\right)^{q-1}+q\left(p^{y^{r-1}}-1\right)^{e^{-2}}+\cdots+q $$ If \(I\) does not divide \(p^{\sigma^{-1}}-1\), we are done. Otherwise, \(l=q .\) But in that case \(q^{2}\) does not divide \(b\), and hence there exists a prime \(l \neq q\) such that \(I\) divides \(b\). Then the degree of \(F\left(\zeta_{1}\right)\) over \(F\) is \(q^{\prime}\), so \(K\) contains subfields of arbitrary degree over \(\left.F .\right]\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
We have shown that there exists a prime \(l\) such that the period of \(p ~\text{mod} ~ l\) is \(q^r\). This implies that the degree of \(F(\zeta_{1})\) over \(F\) is \(q^r\), which means that \(K\) contains subfields of arbitrary degree over \(F\). Therefore, \(K\) is algebraically closed.

Step by step solution

01

Define constants and consider the provided number

We are given a prime \(p\), prime \(q\), and an integer \(r \geqq 1\). Now consider the number \[ b = \frac{p^r - 1}{p^{r^{-1}} - 1} = \left(p^{r^{-1}} - 1\right)^{q -1} + q\left(p^{r^{-1}} - 1\right)^{q^{-2}} + \cdots + q. \]
02

Let l be a prime divisor of b

Let \(l\) be a prime dividing the number \(b\). We have two cases to consider: Case 1: \(l\) does not divide \(p^{r^{-1}} - 1\). In this case, we are done. Case 2: \(l\) divides \(p^{r^{-1}} - 1\). In this case, we have \(l = q\). However, as given in the hint, we know that \(q^2\) does not divide \(b\). Hence, there must exist a prime \(l \neq q\) such that \(l\) divides \(b\).
03

Determine the degree of F(ζ1) over F

Based on our analysis in Step 2, we have shown that there exists a prime \(l\) such that the period of \(p ~\text{mod} ~ l\) is \(q^r\). This implies that the degree of \(F(\zeta_{1})\) over \(F\) is \(q^r\).
04

Conclude that K is algebraically closed

Since we have determined that the degree of \(F(\zeta_{1})\) over \(F\) is \(q^r\), which means that K contains subfields of arbitrary degree over F. This implies that K is algebraically closed. Thus, we have proven that field \(K\) is algebraically closed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Primitive Roots of Unity
The fancy term 'primitive roots of unity' sends some students into a spiral, but don’t worry—it's actually a simple concept to grasp. In the field of complex numbers, an nth root of unity is any number that gives 1 when raised to the nth power. Now, among these roots, some are called primitive because they are the 'original' roots from which the others can be derived.

Mathematically, if you raise a primitive lth root of unity to any power less than l, you won’t get 1. This property makes them very useful, especially when we talk about field extensions, where we extend a field (such as the prime field F in our original exercise) by adding these roots of unity to the field. This move can lead to fascinating outcomes, such as potentially turning the expanded field into an algebraically closed one, where every non-constant polynomial has a root in that field.
Field Extension
Think of a field extension as a sort of upgrade to a field. We start with a field—it can be as simple as the set of all rational numbers—and then we add more elements to it. These new elements can be square roots, cube roots, or in our exercise's case, the primitive roots of unity.

When we adjoin all primitive lth roots of unity to the prime field F, where l is a prime number different from the characteristic p of the field, we get a much bigger playground, the field K. The really cool part is figuring out the properties of this new, larger field. Our exercise showed that K is algebraically closed, meaning every polynomial with coefficients from K has at least one root in K. Turns out, extending fields is like giving them superpowers!
Van der Waerden's Trick
Some tricks never get old, and Van der Waerden's trick is one of them. It’s a strategy often used in number theory to create a new prime number under certain conditions. The trick uses a specially crafted expression that guarantees the existence of a prime divider with a specific property.

In our exercise, we applied this trick to find a prime number l with a period of p mod l being exactly qr. The trick involved the expression for b given in the exercise. By carefully analyzing the divisors of b, we differentiated between cases where l equaled q or not—each leading to the conclusion that there's a prime l that meets our needs. This clever move allowed us to understand the structure of F's extension better and its properties. Talk about a smart way to solve a problem!
Characteristic of a Field
Finally, let's demystify the 'characteristic of a field.' This term can sound intimidating, but it's just a measure of the field's distinct nature. Imagine counting repetitively, adding the number 1 to itself over and over again. In most fields you're familiar with, like the real numbers, you can keep adding forever. But in some special fields, particularly finite fields, you can only add 1 to itself so many times before you end up back at the starting block, which is 0.

The number of times you need to add 1 to itself to get back to 0 is what we call the characteristic of the field. In our exercise, the field F, denoted as Fp, has a characteristic p, where p is a prime. This characteristic plays a key role in determining the field's structure and properties, for instance, how it interacts with roots of unity for the extension K.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(k=\mathbf{C}(t)\) be the field of rational functions in one variable. Find the Galois group over \(k\) of the following polynomtals: (a) \(X^{3}+X+t\) (b) \(X^{3}-X+t\) (c) \(X^{3}+t X+1\) (d) \(X^{3}-2 t X+t\) (e) \(X^{3}-X-t\) (f) \(X^{3}+t^{2} X-t^{3}\)

Let \(f(X) \in \mathbf{Z}[X]\) be a non-constant polynomial with integer coefficients. Show that the values \(f(a)\) with \(a \in \mathbf{Z}^{+}\) are divisible by infinitely many primes. [Note: This is trivial. A much deeper question is whether there are infinitely many a such that \(f(a)\) is prime. There are three necessary conditions: The leading coefficient of \(f\) is positive. The polynomial is irreducible. The set of values \(f\left(\mathbf{Z}^{+}\right)\) has no common divisor \(>1\). A conjecture of Bouniakowski [Bo 1854\(]\) states that these conditions are sufficient. The conjecture was rediscovered later and generalized to several polynomials by Schinzel [Sch 58]. A special case is the conjecture that \(X^{2}+1\) represents infinitely many primes. For a discussion of the general conjecture and a quantitative version giving a conjectured asymptotic estimate, see Bateman and Horn [BaH 62]. Also see the comments in [HaR 74]. More precisely, let \(f_{1}, \ldots, f\), be polynomials with integer coefficients satisfying the first two conditions (positive leading coefficient, irreducible). Let $$ f=f_{1} \cdots f_{r} $$ be their product, and assume that \(f\) satisfies the third condition. Define: \(\pi_{(O}(x)=\) number of positive integers \(n \leqq x\) such that \(f_{1}(n), \ldots, f_{r}(n)\) are all primes. (We ignore the finite number of values of \(n\) for which some \(f_{\mathrm{A}}(n)\) is negative.) The Bateman-Horn conjecture is that $$ \pi_{(f)}(x) \sim\left(d_{1} \cdots d_{r}\right)^{-1} C(f) \int_{0}^{x} \frac{1}{(\log t)^{r}} d t $$ where $$ C(f)=\prod_{p}\left\\{\left(1-\frac{1}{p}\right)^{-r}\left(1-\frac{N_{f}(p)}{p}\right)\right\\}, $$ the product being taken over all primes \(p\), and \(N_{f}(p)\) is the number of solutions of the congruence $$ f(n) \equiv 0 \bmod p $$ Bateman and Horn show that the product converges absolutely. When \(r=1\) and \(f(n)=a n+b\) with \(a, b\) relatively prime integers, \(a>0\), then one gets Dirichlet's theorem that there are infinitely many primes in an arithmetic progression, together with the Dirichlet density of such primes. [BaH 62] P. T. BATEMAN and R. HoRN, A heuristic asymptotic formula concerning the distribution of prime numbers, Math. Comp. \(16(1962)\) pp. \(363-367\) [Bo 1854] V. BoUNIAKOWSKY, Sur les diviseurs numériques invariables des fonctions rationnelles entières, Mémoires sc, math. et phys. \(T, V I\) ( 1854 \(1855)\) pp. \(307-329\) \([\mathrm{HaR} 74]\) H. HALBERSTAM and H.-E. RICHERT, Sieve methods, Academic Press. 1974 \([\) Sch 58\(]\) A. SCHINZEL and W. SIERPINSKI, Sur certaines hypothèses concernant les nombres premiers, Acta Arith. \(4(1958)\) pp. \(185-208\)

Let \(k\) be a field such that every finite extension is cyclic, and having one extension of degree \(n\) for each integer \(n .\) Show that the Galois group \(G=G\left(k^{a} / k\right)\) is the inverse limit \(\lim \mathbf{Z} / m \mathbf{Z}\), as \(m \mathbf{Z}\) ranges over all ideals of \(\mathbf{Z}\), ordered by inclusion. Show that this limit is isomorphic to the direct product of the limits $$ \prod_{p} \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \mathbf{Z} / p^{n} \mathbf{Z}=\prod_{p} \mathbf{Z}_{p} $$ taken over all prime numbers \(p\), in other words, it is isomorphic to the product of all p-adic integers.

Let \(k\) be a field of characteristic \(\neq 2 .\) Let \(c \in k, c \notin k^{2} .\) Let \(F=k(\sqrt{c}) .\) Let \(\alpha=a+b \sqrt{c}\) with \(a, b \in k\) and not both \(a, b=0\). Let \(E=F(\sqrt{\alpha})\). Prove that the following conditions are equivalent. (1) \(E\) is Galois over \(k\). (2) \(E=F\left(\sqrt{\alpha^{\prime}}\right)\), where \(\alpha^{\prime}=a-b \sqrt{c}\). (3) Either \(\alpha \alpha^{\prime}=a^{2}-c b^{2} \in k^{2}\) or \(c \alpha \alpha^{\prime} \in k^{2}\). Show that when these conditions are satisfied, then \(E\) is cyclic over \(k\) of degree 4 if and only if \(c \alpha \alpha^{\prime} \in k^{2} .\)

(a) Let \(K\) be cyclic over \(k\) of degree 4, and of characteristic \(\neq 2 .\) Let \(G_{K / k}=\langle\sigma\rangle\). Let \(E\) be the unique subfield of \(K\) of degree 2 over \(k\). Since \([K: E]=2\), there exists \(\alpha \in K\) such that \(\alpha^{2}=\gamma \in E\) and \(K=E(\alpha)\). Prove that there exists \(z \in E\) such that $$ z \sigma z=-1, \quad \sigma \alpha=z \alpha, \quad z^{2}=\sigma \gamma / \gamma $$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.