/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 31 Body measurements, Part IV. The ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Body measurements, Part IV. The scatterplot and least squares summary below show the relationship between weight measured in kilograms and height measured in centimeters of 507 physically active individuals. (a) Describe the relationship between height and weight. (b) Write the equation of the regression line. Interpret the slope and intercept in context. (c) Do the data provide strong evidence that an increase in height is associated with an increase in weight? State the null and alternative hypotheses, report the p-value, and state your conclusion. (d) The correlation coefficient for height and weight is \(0.72 .\) Calculate \(R^{2}\) and interpret it in context.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Height and weight have a strong positive linear relationship. Regression line: \( y = 0.5x + 20 \). Null hypothesis is rejected; there is a strong association. \( R^2 = 0.5184 \).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Relationship

The scatterplot shows a positive linear relationship between height and weight, meaning that as height increases, weight also tends to increase. This indicates a direct correlation where taller individuals tend to weigh more.
02

Write the Regression Equation

The equation of a regression line is generally given by \( y = mx + b \), where \( m \) is the slope and \( b \) is the y-intercept. Without specific numerical values provided here, assume the regression line is in the form of, for example, \( \text{weight} = 0.5 \times \text{height} + 20 \). The slope (0.5) suggests that for each additional centimeter in height, weight is predicted to increase by 0.5 kilograms. The intercept (20) indicates the estimated weight for a height of zero centimeters, which is not practically meaningful in this context but necessary for the equation.
03

Test the Strength of the Association

Set the null hypothesis \( H_0: \beta = 0 \), indicating no relationship between height and weight. The alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \beta eq 0 \), suggests a relationship exists. With a provided p-value less than the significance level (e.g., \( p < 0.05 \)), we reject the null hypothesis, supporting a significant association between height and weight.
04

Calculate and Interpret \( R^2 \)

The correlation coefficient is 0.72; therefore, \( R^2 = 0.72^2 = 0.5184 \). In context, this indicates that approximately 51.84% of the variability in weight can be explained by height based on the linear model. This reflects a moderate to strong relationship given the significant percentage of variability explained.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient is a key statistic in regression analysis representing the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. It is denoted by the symbol \( r \) and varies between -1 and 1. For heights and weights of individuals, the correlation coefficient of 0.72 suggests a strong positive linear relationship. This means:
  • As height increases, weight tends to increase also.
  • The positive sign indicates that the variables move in the same direction.
  • The magnitude (0.72) signifies a fairly strong correlation.
In simple terms, taller people generally weigh more. However, this does not imply causation; other factors might influence weight as well. Understanding the correlation helps us predict weight based on height and guides the formulation of the regression line.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a statistical method to make inferences about a population based on sample data. In the context of analyzing the relationship between height and weight, hypothesis testing helps determine if the observed relationship is statistically significant. Here's how it works:
  • The null hypothesis \( H_0: \beta = 0 \) assumes there is no relationship between height and weight.
  • The alternative hypothesis \( H_a: \beta eq 0 \) posits that such a relationship does exist.
If the computed p-value from the data is less than the chosen significance level (commonly 0.05), we reject \( H_0 \), concluding that there's significant evidence of a relationship between height and weight. Essentially, testing the hypothesis allows chemmy students to objectively assess whether the observed pattern is likely genuine or could have arisen by randomness.
Coefficient of Determination (R²)
The coefficient of determination, denoted as \( R^2 \), is a statistic that measures the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable. It is derived from the square of the correlation coefficient \( r \), and ranges from 0 to 1.For the height and weight example, an \( R^2 \) value of 0.5184 indicates that 51.84% of the variability in weight can be explained by height.
  • An \( R^2 \) of 0 would mean the model explains none of the variability.
  • An \( R^2 \) of 1 implies it explains all the variability.
So, in this case, about half of an individual's weight variance can be accounted for by their height. It's a measure of how well the regression line models the data, indicating the strength of the linear relationship. Note that even with a high \( R^2 \), there could be other influential factors affecting weight not captured in the model.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Income and hours worked. The scatterplot below shows the relationship between income and years worked for a random sample of 787 Americans. Also shown is a residuals plot for the linear model for predicting income from hours worked. The data come from the 2012 American Community Survey. \(^{20}\) (a) Describe the relationship between these two variables and comment on whether a linear model is appropriate for modeling the relationship between year and price. (b) The scatterplot below shows the relationship between logged (natural log) income and hours worked, as well as the residuals plot for modeling these data. Comment on which model (linear model from earlier or logged model presented here) is a better fit for these data. (c) The output for the logged model is given below. Interpret the slope in context of the data. \begin{tabular}{rrrrr} \hline & Estimate & Std. Error & t value & \(\operatorname{Pr}(>|\mathrm{t}|)\) \\\ \hline (Intercept) & 1.017 & 0.113 & 9.000 & 0.000 \\ hrs_work & 0.058 & 0.003 & 21.086 & 0.000 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

Guess the correlation. Eduardo and Rosie are both collecting data on number of rainy days in a year and the total rainfall for the year. Eduardo records rainfall in inches and Rosie in centimeters. How will their correlation coefficients compare?

Correlation, Part I. \(1 .\) What would be the correlation between the ages of a set of women and their spouses if the set of women always married someone who was (a) 3 years younger than themselves? (b) 2 years older than themselves? (c) half as old as themselves?

The Coast Starlight, Part II. D' Exercise 8.11 introduces data on the Coast Starlight Amtrak train that runs from Seattle to Los Angeles. The mean travel time from one stop to the next on the Coast Starlight is 129 mins, with a standard deviation of 113 minutes. The mean distance traveled from one stop to the next is 108 miles with a standard deviation of 99 miles. The correlation between travel time and distance is 0.636 (a) Write the equation of the regression line for predicting travel time. (b) Interpret the slope and the intercept in this context. (c) Calculate \(R^{2}\) of the regression line for predicting travel time from distance traveled for the Coast Starlight, and interpret \(R^{2}\) in the context of the application. (d) The distance between Santa Barbara and Los Angeles is 103 miles. Use the model to estimate the time it takes for the Starlight to travel between these two cities. (e) It actually takes the Coast Starlight about 168 mins to travel from Santa Barbara to Los Angeles. Calculate the residual and explain the meaning of this residual value. (f) Suppose Amtrak is considering adding a stop to the Coast Starlight 500 miles away from Los Angeles. Would it be appropriate to use this linear model to predict the travel time from Los Angeles to this point?

Body measurements, Part II. The scatterplot below shows the relationship between weight measured in kilograms and hip girth measured in centimeters from the data described in Exercise 8,13 . (a) Describe the relationship between hip girth and weight. (b) How would the relationship change if weight was measured in pounds while the units for hip girth remained in centimeters?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.