/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 The voltage \(V\) (in volts) acr... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The voltage \(V\) (in volts) across a circuit is given by Ohm's Law: \(V=I R\), where \(I\) is the current (in amps) in the circuit and \(R\) is the resistance (in ohms). Suppose we connect two resistors with resistances \(R_{1}\) and \(R_{2}\) in parallel as shown in Figure \(10.5 .5 .\) The total resistance \(R\) in the circuit is then given by $$\frac{1}{R}=\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{2}}$$ a. Assume that the current, \(I\), and the resistances, \(R_{1}\) and \(R_{2}\), are changing over time, \(t\). Use the Chain Rule to write a formula for \(\frac{d V}{d t}\). b. Suppose that, at some particular point in time, we measure the current to be 3 amps and that the current is increasing at \(\frac{1}{10}\) amps per second, while resistance \(R_{1}\) is 2 ohms and decreasing at the rate of 0.2 ohms per second and \(R_{2}\) is 1 ohm and increasing at the rate of 0.5 ohms per second. At what rate is the voltage changing at this point in time?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The voltage across the circuit is changing at a rate of 2 volts per second at this point in time.

Step by step solution

01

We're given the equation for the total resistance in the circuit with resistors in parallel: \(\frac{1}{R}=\frac{1}{R_{1}}+\frac{1}{R_{2}}\) We are also given Ohm's Law which relates voltage, current, and resistance: \(V=IR\) #Step 2: Differentiate both sides of the total resistance equation with respect to time#

Since all the variables change with time, we need to find the derivative of each term with respect to time. \(\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{R}\right)=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{R_{1}}\right)+\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{R_{2}}\right)\) #Step 3: Use Chain Rule to calculate the derivatives#
02

Apply the Chain Rule to each term, and we get: \(-\frac{1}{R^{2}}\frac{dR}{dt}=-\frac{1}{R_{1}^{2}}\frac{dR_{1}}{dt}-\frac{1}{R_{2}^{2}}\frac{dR_{2}}{dt}\) #Step 4: Find the formula for the rate of change of voltage with respect to time#

Differentiate Ohm's law equation with respect to time (using Chain Rule and Product Rule) as follows: \(\frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{d(IR)}{dt} = I\frac{dR}{dt}+R\frac{dI}{dt}\) Now we can find the relationship between the rate of change of resistance \(\frac{dR}{dt}\) and other given variables from the equation derived in Step 3: \(\frac{dR}{dt} = R^{2}\left(\frac{1}{R_{1}^{2}}\frac{dR_{1}}{dt}+\frac{1}{R_{2}^{2}}\frac{dR_{2}}{dt}\right)\) Substitute this expression into the formula for \(\frac{dV}{dt}\), we get: \(\frac{dV}{dt} = IR^{2}\left(\frac{1}{R_{1}^{2}}\frac{dR_{1}}{dt}+\frac{1}{R_{2}^{2}}\frac{dR_{2}}{dt}\right) + R\frac{dI}{dt}\) #Step 5: Use the given values to find the rate of change of voltage#
03

We are given the following values at a particular point in time: \(I = 3 A\), \(R_1 = 2\Omega\), \(R_2 = 1\Omega\), \(\frac{dI}{dt}=0.1 \frac{A}{s}\), \(\frac{dR_1}{dt}=-0.2\frac{\Omega}{s}\), and \(\frac{dR_2}{dt}=0.5\frac{\Omega}{s}\). First, we need to find the total resistance at this point in time using the provided equation: \(\frac{1}{R} = \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{1}\), which gives \(R = \frac{2}{3}\Omega\). Now we can plug the given values and calculated total resistance into the formula for the rate of change of voltage: \(\frac{dV}{dt} = 3\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2^{2}}\left(-0.2\right)+\frac{1}{1^{2}}\left(0.5\right)\right) + \frac{2}{3}\left(0.1\right)\) #Step 6: Calculate the rate of change of voltage#

Perform the calculation to find the rate of change of voltage at this point in time: \(\frac{dV}{dt} = 3\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^{2}\left(\frac{-0.2}{4}+\frac{0.5}{1}\right) + \frac{2}{3}\left(0.1\right)\) \(\frac{dV}{dt} = 3\left(\frac{4}{9}\right)\left(-0.05+0.5\right) + \frac{1}{5}\) \(\frac{dV}{dt} = \frac{12}{9}(0.45) + \frac{1}{5}\) \(\frac{dV}{dt} = 1.8 + 0.2 = 2\frac{V}{s}\) Therefore, the voltage across the circuit is changing at a rate of 2 volts per second at this point in time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chain Rule differentiation
Understanding the Chain Rule in differentiation is crucial when dealing with functions that are composed of other functions. Essentially, the Chain Rule helps us differentiate composite functions, and it states that the derivative of a composite function is the derivative of the outer function evaluated at the inner function, multiplied by the derivative of the inner function. A classic example of applying the Chain Rule emerges in calculus problems involving circuits, like the one described in the exercise.

In the context of a changing resistance and current in a circuit, we apply the Chain Rule to differentiate complex expressions of resistance and current in terms of time. This is necessary to find the rate at which these quantities are changing. For instance, differentiating \(\frac{1}{R}\) with respect to time requires us to handle the derivative of the reciprocal function \(\frac{1}{R(t)}\), which involves applying the Chain Rule. By mastering the Chain Rule, we gain the ability to track dynamic changes in circuits and many other systems.
Resistors in parallel
When it comes to circuits, resistors can be configured in various ways, with 'parallel' being one of the most common. In a parallel configuration, resistors are connected across the same two points, creating multiple paths for the current to flow. According to Ohm's Law, the voltage across resistors in parallel is the same, but the total resistance offered by the parallel combination differs from that of any single resistor.

The formula for calculating the total resistance \(R\) of parallel resistors, \(\frac{1}{R} = \frac{1}{R_{1}} + \frac{1}{R_{2}}\), is counterintuitive because it shows that adding more resistors in a parallel configuration actually decreases the total resistance. This principle is vital when trying to manage current flow and voltage distribution in electrical systems and plays a significant role in the calculus problem presented, where we were required to find the relationship between the time rate of change in resistance and voltage.
Rate of change of voltage
Voltage changes over time are central to understanding electrical dynamics and are particularly important in applying calculus to electricity. The rate of change of voltage \(\frac{dV}{dt}\) tells us how quickly the voltage is increasing or decreasing at a given moment. It's influenced by variations in current \(I\) and resistance \(R\), as described by Ohm's Law \(V = IR\).

The significance of calculating \(\frac{dV}{dt}\) is underscored when we consider activities like charging a battery, where we are concerned with how quickly the voltage builds up, or in monitoring a circuit's response to changing conditions. In the given problem, this concept is explored by finding the voltage's rate of change as the current and resistances of the parallel resistors vary over time. The complex relationship uncovered by utilizing Ohm's Law and calculus allows engineers and physicists to predict and control the behavior of electronic circuits effectively.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Find all directions in which the directional derivative of \(f(x, y)=y e^{-x y}\) is 1 at the point (0,2) .

In this section we argued that if \(f=f(x, y)\) is a function of two variables and if \(f_{x}\) and \(f_{y}\) both exist and are continuous in an open disk containing the point \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right),\) then \(f\) is differentiable at \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right) .\) This condition ensures that \(f\) is differentiable at \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right),\) but it does not define what it means for \(f\) to be differentiable at \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right) .\) In this exercise we explore the definition of differentiability of a function of two variables in more detail. Throughout, let \(g\) be the function defined by \(g(x, y)=\sqrt{|x y|}\) a. Use appropriate technology to plot the graph of \(g\) on the domain \([-1,1] \times[-1,1] .\) Explain why \(g\) is not locally linear at (0,0) b. Show that both \(g_{x}(0,0)\) and \(g_{y}(0,0)\) exist. If \(g\) is locally linear at \((0,0),\) what must be the equation of the tangent plane \(L\) to \(g\) at (0,0)\(?\) c. Recall that if a function \(f=f(x)\) of a single variable is differentiable at \(x=x_{0},\) then $$f^{\prime}\left(x_{0}\right)=\lim _{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{f\left(x_{0}+h\right)-f\left(x_{0}\right)}{h}$$ exists. We saw in single variable calculus that the existence of \(f^{\prime}\left(x_{0}\right)\) means that the graph of \(f\) is locally linear at \(x=x_{0}\). In other words, the graph of \(f\) looks like its linearization \(L(x)=f\left(x_{0}\right)+\) \(f^{\prime}\left(x_{0}\right)\left(x-x_{0}\right)\) for \(x\) close to \(x_{0} .\) That is, the values of \(f(x)\) can be closely approximated by \(L(x)\) as long as \(x\) is close to \(x_{0}\). We can measure how good the approximation of \(L(x)\) is to \(f(x)\) with the error function $$E(x)=L(x)-f(x)=f\left(x_{0}\right)+f^{\prime}\left(x_{0}\right)\left(x-x_{0}\right)-f(x)$$ As \(x\) approaches \(x_{0}, E(x)\) approaches \(f\left(x_{0}\right)+f^{\prime}\left(x_{0}\right)(0)-f\left(x_{0}\right)=0\), and so \(L(x)\) provides increasingly better approximations to \(f(x)\) as \(x\) gets closer to \(x_{0} .\) Show that, even though \(g(x, y)=\sqrt{|x y|}\) is not locally linear at \((0,0),\) its error term $$ E(x, y)=L(x, y)-g(x, y) $$ at (0,0) has a limit of 0 as \((x, y)\) approaches \((0,0) .\) (Use the linearization you found in part (b).) This shows that just because an error term goes to 0 as \((x, y)\) approaches \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right),\) we cannot conclude that a function is locally linear at \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)\). d. As the previous part illustrates, having the error term go to 0 does not ensure that a function of two variables is locally linear. Instead, we need a notation of a relative error. To see how this works, let us return to the single variable case for a moment and consider \(f=f(x)\) as a function of one variable. If we let \(x=x_{0}+h,\) where \(|h|\) is the distance from \(x\) to \(x_{0}\), then the relative error in approximating \(f\left(x_{0}+h\right)\) with \(L\left(x_{0}+h\right)\) is $$\frac{E\left(x_{0}+h\right)}{h}$$ Show that, for a function \(f=f(x)\) of a single variable, the limit of the relative error is 0 as \(h\) approaches 0 . e. Even though the error term for a function of two variables might have a limit of 0 at a point, our example shows that the function may not be locally linear at that point. So we use the concept of relative error to define differentiability of a function of two variables. When we consider differentiability of a function \(f=f(x, y)\) at a point \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right),\) then if \(x=x_{0}+h\) and \(y=y_{0}+k,\) the distance from \((x, y)\) to \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)\) is \(\sqrt{h^{2}+k^{2}}\)

If $$z=\sin \left(x^{2}+y^{2}\right), \quad x=v \cos (u), \quad y=v \sin (u)$$ find \(\partial z / \partial u\) and \(\partial z / \partial v\). The variables are restricted to domains on which the functions are defined. \(\partial z / \partial u=\) _________. \(\partial z / \partial v=\) _________.

Find the first partial derivatives of \(f(x, y)=\frac{x-4 y}{x+4 y}\) at the point \((x, y)=(4,1)\) \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(4,1)=\) _________. \(\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(4,1)=\) _________.

We know that if a function of a single variable is differentiable at a point, then that function is also continuous at that point. In this exercise we determine that the same property holds for functions of two variables. A function \(f\) of the two variables \(x\) and \(y\) is continuous at a point \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)\) in its domain if $$\lim _{(x, y) \rightarrow\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)} f(x, y)=f\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)$$ or (letting \(x=x_{0}+h\) and \(y=y_{0}+k\), $$\lim _{(h, k) \rightarrow(0,0)} f\left(x_{0}+h, y+k\right)=f\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)$$ Show that if \(f\) is differentiable at \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right),\) then \(f\) is continuous at \(\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right) .\) (Hint: Multiply both sides of the equality that comes from differentiability by \(\lim _{(h, k) \rightarrow(0,0)} \sqrt{h^{2}+k^{2}}\).)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.