/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 5 A certain function \(y=p(x)\) ha... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A certain function \(y=p(x)\) has its local linearization at \(a=3\) given by \(L(x)=-2 x+5\). a. What are the values of \(p(3)\) and \(p^{\prime}(3) ?\) Why? b. Estimate the value of \(p(2.79)\). c. Suppose that \(p^{\prime \prime}(3)=0\) and you know that \(p^{\prime \prime}(x)<0\) for \(x<3\). Is your estimate in (b) too large or too small? d. Suppose that \(p^{\prime \prime}(x)>0\) for \(x>3\). Use this fact and the additional information above to sketch an accurate graph of \(y=p(x)\) near \(x=3\). Include a sketch of \(y=L(x)\) in your work.

Short Answer

Expert verified
p(3) = -1, p'(3) = -2. Estimate p(2.79) = -0.58. The estimate is too large due to concavity.

Step by step solution

01

Find the value of p(3)

Given the local linearization at a=3 is given by the equation: L(x)=−2x+5.When x=3, L(3) = -2(3) + 5 = -6 + 5 = -1.Therefore, the value of p(3) = -1 as the local linearization matches the function value at the point of linearization.
02

Find the value of p'(3)

The slope of the linearization function L(x) at x=3 gives the derivative of p(x) at this point. In this case, the slope of L(x) = -2.So, p'(3) = -2.
03

Estimate the value of p(2.79)

The linear approximation formula is: L(x) = p'(a)(x - a) + p(a).Substitute x = 2.79, a = 3, p'(3) = -2, p(3) = -1 into the formula: L(2.79) = -2 * (2.79 - 3) + (-1).Simplify: L(2.79) = -2 * (-0.21) - 1 = 0.42 - 1 = -0.58.So, the estimate for p(2.79) is -0.58.
04

Analyze if the estimate is too large or too small

Given p''(3) = 0 and p''(x) < 0 for x < 3, it means the function is concave down to the left of x = 3. The function decreases at a higher rate than a straight line. Thus, the linear estimate for p(2.79) is too large due to the concavity.
05

Sketch the graphs of p(x) and L(x)

For the graph of p(x) near x = 3: Since we have p''(x) < 0 for x < 3 and p''(x) > 0 for x > 3, the function transitions from concave down to concave up at x=3. This indicates a point of inflection. The graph should match the linearization at x = 3. Draw L(x) = -2x + 5 which is a straight line with slope -2. Then, sketch y = p(x) such that it is concave down to the left of x = 3 and concave up to the right, intersecting L(x) at x = 3.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

derivative at a point
The derivative of a function at a specific point provides information about the function's instantaneous rate of change at that point. For the given problem, the local linearization of the function at the point \(a=3\) is given by \(L(x) = -2x + 5\). This is essentially a tangent line that approximates the function near \(x=3\).

To find \(p(3)\), we evaluate the linearization at \(x=3\):

\[ L(3) = -2(3) + 5 = -6 + 5 = -1 \]

Thus, \(p(3) = -1\). This is because the local linearization should match the actual function value at the point of linearization.

Now, to find \(p'(3)\), we look at the slope of the linearization. The linear function \(L(x) = -2x + 5\) has a slope of -2. Therefore, \(p'(3) = -2\). The slope of the tangent line at \(a=3\) represents the derivative at that point, providing insight into the rate of change of the function at \(x=3\).
concavity and inflection points
Concavity describes the direction in which a function curves. If the second derivative of a function \(p''(x)\) is positive over an interval, the function is concave up on that interval. If \(p''(x)\) is negative, the function is concave down.

In the given exercise, we know that \(p''(3) = 0\) and \(p''(x) < 0\) for \(x < 3\). This indicates that the function is concave down to the left of \(x = 3\). When a function is concave down, it bends downwards like an upside-down bowl. Because of this concavity, the linear approximation you make for \(p(2.79)\) might be too high, or too large.

The point \(x = 3\) where the concavity changes from downwards to upwards is called an inflection point. This means at \(x = 3\), the function changes its curvature which can either be from concave down to concave up or vice versa.

Given \(p''(x) > 0\) for \(x > 3\), the function is concave up to the right of \(x = 3\). This setup allows us to visually predict how the function behaves—concave down to the left and up to the right of the inflection point.
linear approximation
Linear approximation involves using the tangent line at a specific point to estimate values of the function near that point. This technique is valuable when the exact value of the function is complex to compute.

In the exercise, we use the linear approximation formula which is:

\[ L(x) = p'(a)(x - a) + p(a) \]

Here, \(a = 3\), \(p'(3) = -2\), and \(p(3) = -1\). To estimate \(p(2.79)\), we substitute these values:

\[ L(2.79) = -2 * (2.79 - 3) + (-1) \]

Simplifying, we get:

\[ L(2.79) = -2 * (-0.21) - 1 = 0.42 - 1 = -0.58 \]

Thus, according to the linear approximation, \(p(2.79)\) is approximately -0.58.

This linear approximation is particularly helpful when working near the point where you have the linear representation. However, remember this method might not be perfectly accurate due to the function's concavity. In this case, since the function is concave down to the left of \(x = 3\), we know our approximation might be slightly too high.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

According to the U.S. census, the population of the city of Grand Rapids, MI, was 181,843 in \(1980 ; 189,126\) in 1990 ; and 197,800 in 2000 . a. Between 1980 and 2000 , by how many people did the population of Grand Rapids grow? b. In an average year between 1980 and 2000 , by how many people did the population of Grand Rapids grow? c. Just like we can find the average velocity of a moving body by computing change in position over change in time, we can compute the average rate of change of any function \(f\). In particular, the average rate of change of a function \(f\) over an interval \([a, b]\) is the quotient $$\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}$$ What does the quantity \(\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}\) measure on the graph of \(y=f(x)\) over the interval \([a, b] ?\) d. Let \(P(t)\) represent the population of Grand Rapids at time \(t,\) where \(t\) is measured in years from January \(1,1980 .\) What is the average rate of change of \(P\) on the interval \(t=0\) to \(t=20 ?\) What are the units on this quantity? e. If we assume the population of Grand Rapids is growing at a rate of approximately \(4 \%\) per decade, we can model the population function with the formula $$P(t)=181843(1.04)^{t / 10}$$ Use this formula to compute the average rate of change of the population on the intervals \([5,10],[5,9],[5,8],[5,7],\) and [5,6] f. How fast do you think the population of Grand Rapids was changing on January 1 , 1985 ? Said differently, at what rate do you think people were being added to the population of Grand Rapids as of January \(1,1985 ?\) How many additional people should the city have expected in the following year? Why?

For each of the following prompts, give an example of a function that satisfies the stated criteria. A formula or a graph, with reasoning, is sufficient for each. If no such example is possible, explain why. a. A function \(f\) that is continuous at \(a=2\) but not differentiable at \(a=2\). b. A function \(g\) that is differentiable at \(a=3\) but does not have a limit at \(a=3\). c. A function \(h\) that has a limit at \(a=-2,\) is defined at \(a=-2,\) but is not continuous at \(a=-2\) d. A function \(p\) that satisfies all of the following: \- \(p(-1)=3\) and \(\lim _{x \rightarrow-1} p(x)=2\) $$\text { - } p(0)=1 \text { and } p^{\prime}(0)=0$$ \- \(\lim _{x \rightarrow 1} p(x)=p(1)\) and \(p^{\prime}(1)\) does not exist

Suppose that an accelerating car goes from 0 mph to 61.4 mph in five seconds. Its velocity is given in the following table, converted from miles per hour to feet per second, so that all time measurements are in seconds. (Note: \(1 \mathrm{mph}\) is \(22 / 15 \mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{sec} .)\) Find the average acceleration of the car over each of the first two seconds. $$\begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline t(\mathrm{~s}) & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\ \hline v(t)(\mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{s}) & 0.00 & 30.68 & 53.18 & 69.55 & 81.82 & 90.00 \\ \hline \end{array}$$ average acceleration over the first second \(=\square\) help (units) average acceleration over the second second =\(\square\) help (units)

Suppose that the population, \(P\), of China (in billions) can be approximated by the function \(P(t)=1.15(1.014)^{t}\) where \(t\) is the number of years since the start of \(1993 .\) a. According to the model, what was the total change in the population of China between January 1,1993 and January \(1,2000 ?\) What will be the average rate of change of the population over this time period? Is this average rate of change greater or less than the instantaneous rate of change of the population on January \(1,2000 ?\) Explain and justify, being sure to include proper units on all your answers. b. According to the model, what is the average rate of change of the population of China in the ten-year period starting on January 1, \(2012 ?\) c. Write an expression involving limits that, if evaluated, would give the exact instantaneous rate of change of the population on today's date. Then estimate the value of this limit (discuss how you chose to do so) and explain the meaning (including units) of the value you have found. d. Find an equation for the tangent line to the function \(y=P(t)\) at the point where the \(t\) -value is given by today's date.

A bungee jumper dives from a tower at time \(t=0\). Her height \(h\) (measured in feet) at time \(t\) (in seconds) is given by the graph in Figure 1.1.4. In this problem, you may base your answers on estimates from the graph or use the fact that the jumper's height function is given by \(s(t)=100 \cos (0.75 t) \cdot e^{-0.2 t}+100\). a. What is the change in vertical position of the bungee jumper between \(t=0\) and \(t=15 ?\) b. Estimate the jumper's average velocity on each of the following time intervals: [0,15] , \([0,2],[1,6],\) and \([8,10] .\) Include units on your answers. c. On what time interval(s) do you think the bungee jumper achieves her greatest average velocity? Why? d. Estimate the jumper's instantaneous velocity at \(t=5\). Show your work and explain your reasoning, and include units on your answer. e. Among the average and instantaneous velocities you computed in earlier questions, which are positive and which are negative? What does negative velocity indicate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.