/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Horizon Solutions Inc. is consid... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Horizon Solutions Inc. is considering the purchase of automated machinery that is expected to have a useful life of five years and no residual value. The average rate of return on the average investment has been computed to be 20%, and the cash payback period was computed to be 5.5 years. Do you see any reason to question the validity of the data presented? Explain

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, the payback period exceeds the asset's useful life, which is inconsistent.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We are evaluating the validity of financial data regarding an investment in automated machinery. We need to analyze the given average rate of return and cash payback period to see if they are reasonable for this investment.
02

Check Average Rate of Return

The average rate of return is given as 20%. This implies that the net income from the investment, as a percentage of the initial investment, is 20% on average over the five-year period.
03

Analyze Cash Payback Period

The cash payback period is provided as 5.5 years. This indicates that it takes 5.5 years to recover the initial investment from the net cash inflows generated by the machinery.
04

Compare Time Frames

Now compare the useful life of the machinery, which is 5 years, with the cash payback period of 5.5 years. The payback period exceeds the useful life of the asset, which suggests the investment will take longer to pay back than it will be useful.
05

Draw Conclusion on Validity

Due to the payback period of 5.5 years being longer than the expected useful life of 5 years, there seems to be a discrepancy. This inconsistency questions the validity of the investment data, suggesting that the machinery may not be a financially sound investment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Average Rate of Return
The average rate of return (ARR) is a key metric in investment analysis. It helps investors understand the expected income from an investment. ARR compares the average annual profit to the initial investment cost. In simple terms, it shows how profitable an investment might be.

To calculate ARR, you divide the average annual profit by the initial investment. If you multiply this ratio by 100, you'll get the percentage return. So, for Horizon Solutions Inc., having an ARR of 20% means that the machinery is expected to return 20% of the initial investment as profit every year, on average.
  • Formula: Average Rate of Return = \( \frac{\text{Average Annual Profit}}{\text{Initial Investment}} \times 100 \% \)
  • Purpose: Helps in evaluating investment profitability.
While ARR is useful for quick comparisons, it doesn't consider the time value of money, which means it might not reflect the true value of cash inflows over time. As a simple metric, it's great for initial assessments but should be used alongside other metrics like Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for comprehensive analysis.
Cash Payback Period
The cash payback period is a straightforward method to determine how long it takes for an investment to "pay back" its initial cost from its cash inflows. For investors, this is crucial, as a shorter payback period generally indicates less risk and quicker recovery of the initial outlay.

In the case of Horizon Solutions Inc., the cash payback period for the new machinery is 5.5 years. However, the machinery's useful life is only 5 years. This suggests a problem: it takes longer to recover the investment than the asset remains useful, which is a red flag in investment analysis.
  • Formula: Cash Payback Period = \( \frac{\text{Initial Investment}}{\text{Net Annual Cash Inflows}} \)
  • Indication: Measures risk and speed of recouping investment.
While the payback period does not account for cash flows after payback and ignores the time value of money, its simplicity provides a quick gauge of an investment’s immediacy in recovering costs. That said, the mismatch between the useful life and the payback period here suggests that further scrutiny is needed.
Useful Life of Assets
The useful life of an asset refers to the period during which it is expected to be productive and contribute economic benefits to its owner. This time frame can influence decisions on investments, especially when evaluated alongside other financial metrics like the cash payback period.

For Horizon Solutions Inc., the automated machinery is expected to have a useful life of five years. This means the company anticipates the asset will be functional and generate value for only five years before it is no longer effective or requires replacement.
  • Consideration: Affects depreciation and investment decisions.
  • Comparison with Payback Period: If the asset's useful life is shorter than its payback period, as in this case, a warning signal goes off.
Having a clear understanding of an asset’s useful life is essential in planning. For Horizon Solutions, the discrepancy between the useful life and cash payback period suggests the investment may not yield the full expected return within its operational timeframe. It is crucial to investigate such disparities to ensure sound financial decisions. Analysis of other factors such as technology advancements or maintenance costs could provide additional insight into asset longevity and effectiveness.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The internal rate of return method is used by Carlisle Construction Co. in analyzing a capital expenditure proposal that involves an investment of \(49,890 and annual net cash flows of \)15,000 for each of the six years of its useful life. a. Determine a present value factor for an annuity of \(1 which can be used in determining the internal rate of return. b. Using the factor determined in part (a) and the present value of an annuity of \)1 table appearing in this chapter, determine the internal rate of return for the proposal.

Hot on the Spot Doughnuts has computed the net present value for capital expenditure locations \(A\) and B, using the net present value method. Relevant data related to the computation are as follows: \begin{tabular}{lcc} & Location A & Location B \\ \hline Total present value of net cash flow & \(\$ 371,290\) & \(\$ 396,096\) \\ Amount to be invested & \(\underline{347,000}\) & \(\underline{412,600}\) \\ Net present value & \(\underline{\$(24,290)}\) & \(\$(16,504)\) \end{tabular} Determine the present value index for each proposal.

Pocket Pilot Inc. is considering an investment in new equipment that will be used to manufacture a mobile communications device. The device is expected to generate additional annual sales of 6,000 units at \(\$ 280\) per unit. The equipment has a cost of \(\$ 640,000\), residual value of \(\$ 50,000\), and an 8 -year life. The equipment can only be used to manufacture the device. The cost to manufacture the device is shown below. \(\begin{array}{lr}\text { Cost per unit: } & \$ 45.00 \\ \text { Direct labor } & 180.00 \\ \text { Direct materials } & 32.00 \\ \text { Factory overhead (including depreciation) } & \$ 257.00 \\ \text { Total cost per unit } & \end{array}\) Determine the average rate of return on the equipment.

Master Fab Inc. is considering an investment in equipment that will replace direct labor. The equipment has a cost of \(115,000 with a \)10,000 residual value and a 10-year life. The equipment will replace one employee who has an average wage of \(26,000 per year. In addition, the equipment will have operating and energy costs of \)5,500 per year. Determine the average rate of return on the equipment, giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investment.

The plant manager of Shannon Electronics Company is considering the purchase of new automated assembly equipment. The new equipment will cost \(2,400,000. The manager believes that the new investment will result in direct labor savings of \)600,000 per year for 10 years. a. What is the payback period on this project? b. What is the net present value, assuming a 10% rate of return? c. What else should the manager consider in the analysis?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.