/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Laser Cast, Inc., manufactures c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Laser Cast, Inc., manufactures color laser printers. Model A200 presently sells for \(\$ 400\) and has a total product cost of \(\$ 320\), as follows: \begin{tabular}{lrr} & Direct materials & \(\$ 230\) \\ & Direct labor & 60 \\ & Factory overhead & \(\frac{30}{\$ 320}\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} It is estimated that the competitive selling price for color laser printers of this type will drop to \(\$ 380\) next year. Laser Cast has established a target cost to maintain its historical markup percentage on product cost. Engineers have provided the following cost reduction ideas: 1\. Purchase a plastic printer cover with snap-on assembly. This will reduce the amount of direct labor by nine minutes per unit. 2\. Add an inspection step that will add six minutes per unit of direct labor but reduce the materials cost by \(\$ 8\) per unit. 3\. Decrease the cycle time of the injection molding machine from four minutes to three minutes per part. Thirty percent of the direct labor and \(42 \%\) of the factory overhead is related to running injection molding machines. The direct labor rate is \(\$ 25\) per hour. a. Determine the target cost for Model A200 assuming that the historical markup on product cost is maintained. b. Determine the required cost reduction. c. Evaluate the three engineering improvements to determine if the required cost reduction (drift) can be achieved.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Target cost is $304; required cost reduction is $16. Implementing all proposed changes achieves $16.90 reduction.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Historical Markup Percentage

The historical markup on product cost is found by using the current selling price and the total product cost. Calculate it as follows:\[ \text{Markup Percentage} = \frac{\text{Selling Price} - \text{Total Product Cost}}{\text{Total Product Cost}} = \frac{400 - 320}{320} = \frac{80}{320} = 0.25 \text{ or } 25\% \]
02

Determine Target Cost

To determine the target cost maintaining the historical markup percentage while reducing the selling price to $380:\[ (1 + 0.25) \times \text{Target Product Cost} = 380 \] Thus:\[ \text{Target Product Cost} = \frac{380}{1.25} = 304 \]
03

Calculate Required Cost Reduction

Subtract the target product cost from the current total cost to find the required cost reduction:\[ \text{Required Cost Reduction} = 320 - 304 = 16 \]
04

Analyze Engineering Improvement 1

Reduction in direct labor due to less assembly time:- Change in Direct Labor Time = -9 minutes - \[\frac{-9}{60} \text{ hours} \times 25 \text{ per hour} = -3.75 \text{ reduction in Direct Labor Cost}\]Next, update direct labor cost:- New Direct Labor = 60 - 3.75 = 56.25
05

Analyze Engineering Improvement 2

Add an inspection step that results in:- Change in Direct Labor Time = +6 minutes - \[\frac{6}{60} \text{ hours} \times 25 \text{ per hour} = +2.5 \text{ addition in Direct Labor Cost}\]- Reduction in Material Cost = -8New values:- Direct Labor = 56.25 + 2.5 = 58.75 - Materials = 230 - 8 = 222
06

Analyze Engineering Improvement 3

Decrease cycle time in injection molding which impacts 30% of labor and 42% of overhead:- Original labor cost related to molding: \(0.30 \times 60 = 18\)- New cycle time = 0.75 factor reduction- New labor cost: \(18 \times 0.75 = 13.5\)- Labor cost change: \(18 - 13.5 = 4.5 \text{ reduction}\)New values:- Direct Labor = 58.75 - 4.5 = 54.25For Overhead:- Original overhead related to molding = \(0.42 \times 30 = 12.6\)- New overhead: \(12.6 \times 0.75 = 9.45\)- Overhead cost change: \(12.6 - 9.45 = 3.15 \text{ reduction}\) New Overhead = 30 - 3.15 = 26.85
07

Calculate Total New Cost and Savings

Recalculate the total cost with improvements: - Total New Cost = Materials (222) + Direct Labor (54.25) + Overhead (26.85) = 303.10 - Cost Reduction Achieved = 320 - 303.10 = 16.90
08

Compare Cost Reduction Achieved to Required Reduction

The required cost reduction was $16. The achieved reduction with the proposed engineering improvements is $16.90, which meets and slightly exceeds the requirement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Product Cost Reduction
Reducing product cost is a critical element in maintaining competitiveness, especially when market prices fall. In manufacturing, this often means examining each component of the product's cost structure for potential savings.
To effectively reduce costs, companies should:
  • Analyze each material's cost to explore less expensive alternatives or negotiate better supplier rates.
  • Assess labor costs to identify areas where production efficiency can be improved, thereby reducing the time—and cost—required to manufacture each unit.
  • Re-evaluate factory overhead costs to find savings, such as through energy efficiency improvements or optimizing production schedules.
For instance, in Laser Cast's case, they target labor efficiencies and material costs while also reducing overhead associated with specific machinery to lower product costs.
Manufacturing Process Optimization
Optimizing the manufacturing process involves refining operations to enhance efficiency and reduce inefficiencies.
A proactive approach includes:
  • Streamlining assembly processes to reduce manual labor and time, as seen with Laser Cast’s strategy of using snap-on components.
  • Incorporating quality control steps that prevent defects and waste, which, although they might initially add cost, contribute to reducing overall production errors and rework.
  • Employing advanced technology or machinery that speeds up production cycles without compromising product quality.
By adopting a holistic view of the production process, companies can identify bottlenecks and create a smoother, more cost-effective manufacturing process.
Target Costing
Target costing is a strategic approach where a company determines the cost to produce a product after the selling price and desired profit margins have been set.
This backward method encourages manufacturers to control costs tightly to meet margin goals. Steps include:
  • Identifying the predicted market price for the product and determining acceptable profit margins.
  • Calculating the target cost by subtracting the profit margin from the expected selling price.
  • Implementing cost-reduction strategies to meet this target, ensuring that production can proceed profitably.
For Laser Cast, the need to lower their cost to reach a target set by reduced market price underscores the importance of target costing in sustaining profitability amid competitive pressures.
Engineering Improvements in Production
Engineering improvements focus on modifying production techniques and equipment to enhance performance and cost-effectiveness. By analyzing production tasks, engineers can develop new methods that lead to substantial savings.
Examples of engineering improvements include:
  • Innovating new assembly techniques that reduce labor time, as with the snap-on printer cover used by Laser Cast.
  • Enhancing machines to operate more efficiently, decreasing cycle times and minimizing energy use, which can significantly cut down labor and overhead costs.
  • Incorporating additional inspection processes to reduce material waste, leading to fewer defective products and less financial loss.
Such enhancements not only ensure that production meets the required cost reductions but also stabilize quality, supporting the company’s goals for operational excellence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Inman Construction Company is considering selling excess machinery with a book value of \(\$ 280,000\) (original cost of \(\$ 400,000\) less accumulated depreciation of \(\$ 120,000\) ) for \(\$ 292,000\), less a \(5 \%\) brokerage commission. Alternatively, the machinery can be leased for a total of \(\$ 312,000\) for five years, after which it is expected to have no residual value. During the period of the lease, Inman Construction Company's costs of repairs, insurance, and property tax expenses are expected to be \(\$ 36,000\). a. Prepare a differential analysis report, dated January 3, 2010, for the lease or sell decision. b. On the basis of the data presented, would it be advisable to lease or sell the machinery? Explain.

Roadworthy Tire and Rubber Company has capacity to produce 170,000 tires. Roadworthy presently produces and sells 130,000 tires for the North American market at a price of \(\$ 90\) per tire. Roadworthy is evaluating a special order from a European automobile company, Euro Motors. Euro is offering to buy 25,000 tires for \(\$ 75\) per tire. Roadworthy's accounting system indicates that the total cost per tire is as follows: Direct materials \(32 Direct labor 8 Factory overhead (60% variable) 25 Selling and administrative expenses (35% variable) 20 ____ Total \)85 ____ ____ Roadworthy pays a selling commission equal to \(5 \%\) of the selling price on North American orders, which is included in the variable portion of the selling and administrative expenses. However, this special order would not have a sales commission. If the order was accepted, the tires would be shipped overseas for an additional shipping cost of \(\$ 6.00\) per tire. In addition, Euro has made the order conditional on receiving European safety certification. Roadworthy estimates that this certification would cost \(\$ 125,000\). a. Prepare a differential analysis report dated May 4, 2010, for the proposed sale to Euro Motors. b. What is the minimum price per unit that would be financially acceptable to Roadworthy?

Seattle Roast Coffee Company produces Columbian coffee in batches of 8,000 pounds. The standard quantity of materials required in the process is 8,000 pounds, which cost \(\$ 5.00\) per pound. Columbian coffee can be sold without further processing for \(\$ 10.80\) per pound. Columbian coffee can also be processed further to yield Decaf Columbian, which can be sold for \(\$ 12.50\) per pound. The processing into Decaf Columbian requires additional processing costs of \(\$ 10,500\) per batch. The additional processing will also cause a \(5 \%\) loss of product due to evaporation. a. Prepare a differential analysis report for the decision to sell or process further. b. Should Seattle Roast sell Columbian coffee or process further and sell Decaf Columbian? c. Determine the price of Decaf Columbian that would cause neither an advantage or disadvantage for processing further and selling Decaf Columbian.

Down Home Jeans Co. has an annual plant capacity of 65,000 units, and current production is 45,000 units. Monthly fixed costs are \(\$ 40,000\), and variable costs are \(\$ 22\) per unit. The present selling price is \(\$ 35\) per unit. On March 18,2010 , the company received an offer from Fields Company for 18,000 units of the product at \(\$ 29\) each. Fields Company will market the units in a foreign country under its own brand name. The additional business is not expected to affect the domestic selling price or quantity of sales of Down Home Jeans Co. a. Prepare a differential analysis report for the proposed sale to Fields Company. b. Briefly explain the reason why accepting this additional business will increase operating income. c. What is the minimum price per unit that would produce a contribution margin?

A company is considering replacing an old piece of machinery, which cost \(\$ 600,000\) and has \(\$ 350,000\) of accumulated depreciation to date, with a new machine that costs \(\$ 450,000\). The old equipment could be sold for \(\$ 72,000\). The annual variable production costs associated with the old machine are estimated to be \(\$ 165,000\) for eight years. The annual variable production costs for the new machine are estimated to be \(\$ 112,750\) for eight years. a. Determine the total and annualized differential income or loss anticipated from replacing the old machine. b. What is the sunk cost in this situation?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.