/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 77 The given function \(f\) is one-... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The given function \(f\) is one-to-one. Find \(f^{-1}(x)\). $$f(x)=\frac{3-x}{2 x+1}$$

Short Answer

Expert verified
The inverse function \( f^{-1}(x) = \frac{3-x}{2x+1} \) is the same as \( f(x) \).

Step by step solution

01

Replace f(x) with y

Start with the equation given for the function: \[ y = \frac{3 - x}{2x + 1} \] This sets up our equation with \( y \) representing \( f(x) \).
02

Swap x and y

Since we need to find the inverse function, swap \( x \) and \( y \) in the equation. \[ x = \frac{3 - y}{2y + 1} \]
03

Solve for y - Clear Fractions

Multiply both sides by \( 2y + 1 \) to clear the fraction: \[ x(2y + 1) = 3 - y \] This results in: \[ 2xy + x = 3 - y \]
04

Isolate terms with y

Move all terms involving \( y \) to one side and other terms to the opposite side: \[ 2xy + y = 3 - x \]
05

Factor out y

Factor \( y \) from the terms on the left: \[ y(2x + 1) = 3 - x \]
06

Solve for y

Finally, divide by the coefficient of \( y \) to solve for \( y \): \[ y = \frac{3 - x}{2x + 1} \]
07

Verification of Inverse

Now rewrite \( y \) as \( f^{-1}(x) \), and verify it is the inverse. Since after simplification, the function remains same, verify that \( f(f^{-1}(x)) = x \). The given function is its own inverse.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

One-to-one Functions
Understanding what a one-to-one function is, begins with recognizing that such functions map each output to only one input. This is a key property because if a function is not one-to-one, it cannot have an inverse. To visualize this, imagine a function where each input value (x) gives a unique output (f(x)). If you have distinct inputs, they correspond to distinct outputs. This relationship ensures that by knowing the output, you can determine a unique input. A quick test to check if a function is one-to-one is the Horizontal Line Test. Draw a horizontal line across the graph of the function. If at any point the line crosses more than one part of the graph, the function is not one-to-one. In the context of the given function, verifying one-to-one ensures an inverse exists, which is vital for tasks like finding an inverse function. Here, the function given is stated to be one-to-one, enabling us to proceed with finding its inverse confidently.
Algebraic Manipulation
Algebraic manipulation is a crucial process in solving for inverse functions. It involves reshaping and simplifying expressions to isolate desired variables. Let's break down the process using our function, where we started by setting it as an equation with y representing the function itself:
  • Initially, we had: \( y = \frac{3 - x}{2x + 1} \).
  • Then, we swapped the roles of \( x \) and \( y \), which transformed the equation to \( x = \frac{3 - y}{2y + 1} \).
  • To eliminate the fraction, we multiplied both sides by \( 2y + 1 \), resulting in \( x(2y + 1) = 3 - y \).
  • We rearranged terms to isolate \( y \), giving us \( 2xy + y = 3 - x \).
  • By factoring out \( y \), we deduced \( y(2x + 1) = 3 - x \).
  • Finally, we solved for \( y \) by dividing both sides by \( 2x + 1 \), achieving \( y = \frac{3 - x}{2x + 1} \).
Each algebraic step was necessary to achieve our final goal: to express \( y \) independently of any equation conditions, revealing that the inverse closely resembles the original function.
Verifying Inverses
Once we find what appears to be an inverse function, verifying it ensures that the function truly reverses the original mapping. This involves substitution and simplification to see if the function returns the input.To verify, take the inverse function \( f^{-1}(x) \) and plug it back into the original function to see if we can resolve it to \( x \):
  • Using \( f(f^{-1}(x)) \), substitute \( f^{-1}(x) = \frac{3 - x}{2x + 1} \) back into \( f(x) = \frac{3 - x}{2x + 1} \).
  • Simplify to show it equates back to \( x \).
In this case, because the function is its own inverse, performing these steps verifies that \( f(f^{-1}(x)) = x \) and \( f^{-1}(f(x)) = x \). This property highlights the essential characteristics of inverse functions. Ensuring this verification is a critical step as it validates all previous algebraic work and confirms the ability to reverse the function successfully.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose that the cost of photovoltaic cells each year after 1980 was \(75 \%\) as much as the year prior. If the cost was \(\$ 30 /\) watt in \(1980,\) model their price in dollars with an exponential function, where \(x\) corresponds to years after \(1980 .\) Then estimate the year when the price of photovoltaic cells was \(\$ 1.00\) per watt.

Solve each problem. World Population Growth since 2000 , world population in millions closely fits the exponential function $$ y=6079 e^{0.0126 x} $$ where \(x\) is the number of years since 2000 . (Image can't copy) (a) The world population was about 6555 million in 2006 . How closely does the function approximate this value? (b) Use this model to estimate the population in 2010 . (c) Use this model to predict the population in 2025 . (d) Explain why this model may not be accurate for 2025 .

A construction worker wants to invest \(\$ 60,000\) in a pension plan. One investment offers \(2 \%\) compounded quarterly. Another offers \(1.8 \%\) compounded continuously. Which investment will earn more interest in 5 years? How much more will the better plan earn?

The revenue in millions of dollars for the first 5 years of mobile advertising is given by \(A(x)=42(2)^{x},\) where \(x\) is years after the industry started. (Source: Business Insider.) (a) Determine analytically when revenue was about \(\$ 400\) million. (b) Solve part (a) graphically. (c) According to this model, when did the mobile advertising revenue reach \(\$ 1\) billion?

If interest is compounded continuously and the interest rate is tripled, what effect will this have on the time required for an investment to double?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.