/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 4.25 Suppose that the number of event... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Suppose that the number of events that occur in a specified time is a Poisson random variable with parameter λ. If each event is counted with probability p, independently of every other event, show that the number of events that are counted is a Poisson random variable with parameter λp. Also, give an intuitive argument as to why this should be so. As an application of the preceding result, suppose that the number of distinct uranium deposits in a given area is a Poisson random variable with parameter λ=10. If, in a fixed period of time, each deposit is discovered independently with probability 150, find the probability that

(a) exactly ,

(b) at least 1, and

(c) at most 1deposit is discovered during that time.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The probability that exactly,P(Y=1)=0.2·e-0.2

(b) The probability that at least 1 andP(Y≥1)=1-P(Y=0)=1-e-0.2

(c) The probability that at most 1 deposit is discovered during that time isP(Y≤1)=P(Y=0)+P(Y=1)=e-0.2+0.2·e-0.2

Step by step solution

01

Step 1  Given information

Define X~Pois(λ). Define Yas the random variable that counts the events that are accepted. We are required to show that Y~Pois(pλ). Take any k∈ℕ0and using LOTP we have that

P(Y=k)=∑n=k∞P(Y=k∣X=n)P(X=n)

Observe that if we are given X=n,Yhas binomial distribution since every of nevents are independently accepted with the probability p.

02

calculation

P(Y=k)=∑n=k∞nkpk(1-p)n-k·λnn!e-λ

=∑n=k∞n!k!(n-k)!pk(1-p)n-k·λnn!e-λ

=pkk!e-λ∑n=k∞1(n-k)!(1-p)n-k·λn

=pkk!e-λ∑n=0∞1n!(1-p)n·λn+k

=pkk!e-λλk∑n=0∞1n!(1-p)n·λn

=pkk!e-λλk∑n=0∞(λ(1-p))nn!

=pkk!e-λλk·eλ(1-p)

=(λp)kk!e-λp

03

Explanation

Since it holds for every k, we have proved that Y~Pois(λp). Observe that it is consistent with our intuition: the number of accepted events also behaves like Poisson process since the original distribution is Poisson and the average rate is pλ. For the last question, we are given that λp=10·150=0.2.

04

Final answer

(a) P(Y=1)=0.2·e-0.2

(b) P(Y≥1)=1-P(Y=0)=1-e-0.2

(c)P(Y≤1)=P(Y=0)+P(Y=1)=e-0.2+0.2·e-0.2

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Suppose in Problem 4.72 that the two teams are evenly matched and each has probability 1 2 of winning each game. Find the expected number of games played.

4.20. A gambling book recommends the following "winning strategy" for the game of roulette: Bet \(1on red. If red appears (which has probability 1838), then take the \)1profit and quit. If red does not appear and you lose this bet (which has probability 2038of occurring), make additional $1bets on red on each of the next two spins of the roulette wheel and then quit. Let Xdenote your winnings when you quit.

(a) Find P{X>0}.

(b) Are you convinced that the strategy is indeed a "winning" strategy? Explain your answer!

(c) Find E[X].

There are two possible causes for a breakdown of a machine. To check the first possibility would cost C1 dollars, and, if that were the cause of the breakdown, the trouble could be repaired at a cost of R1 dollars. Similarly, there are costs C2 and R2 associated with the second possibility. Let p and 1 − p denote, respectively, the probabilities that the breakdown is caused by the first and second possibilities. Under what conditions on p, Ci, Ri, i = 1, 2, should we check the first possible cause of breakdown and then the second, as opposed to reversing the checking order, so as to minimize the expected cost involved in returning the machine to working order?

From a set of nrandomly chosen people, let Eijdenote the event that persons iand jhave the same birthday. Assume that each person is equally likely to have any of the 365 days of the year as his or her birthday. Find

(a) PE3,4∣E1,2;

(b) PE1,3∣E1,2;

(c) PE2,3∣E1,2∩E1,3.

What can you conclude from your answers to parts (a)-(c) about the independence of the n2events Eij?

For a hypergeometric random variable, determine

P{X=k+1}/P{X=k}

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.