/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 A lake contains 4 distinct types... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A lake contains 4 distinct types of fish. Suppose that each fish caught is equally likely to be any one of these types. Let \(Y\) denote the number of fish that need be caught to obtain at least onc of each type. (a) Give an interval \((a, b)\) such that \(P\\{a \leq Y \leq b\\}\) $$ \geq .90 $$ (b) Using the one-sided Chebyshev inequality, how many fish need we plan on catching so as to be at least 90 percent certain of obtaining at least one of each type.

Short Answer

Expert verified
To be at least 90% certain of obtaining at least one of each type, the interval is approximately \((4.5, 12.5)\) using the empirical rule, and using the one-sided Chebyshev inequality, we need to plan on catching at least 3 fish.

Step by step solution

01

Determine the Probability Distribution

We are given that each fish caught is equally likely to be any one of the 4 types. According to the problem, let's denote the events: \(A_i\): Catching the \(i\)th distinct fish type for the first time, where \(i = 1, 2, 3, 4\). The probability of each event happening is: \(P(A_1) = 1\) \(P(A_2) = \frac{3}{4}\) \(P(A_3) = \frac{2}{4}\) \(P(A_4) = \frac{1}{4}\)
02

Calculate the Expected Value \(E(Y)\)

Using the probabilities from Step 1, we have: \(E(Y) = 1 \cdot P(A_1) + 2 \cdot P(A_2) + 3 \cdot P(A_3) + 4 \cdot P(A_4)\) \(E(Y) = 1 \cdot 1 + 2 \cdot \frac{3}{4} + 3 \cdot \frac{2}{4} + 4 \cdot \frac{1}{4}\) \(E(Y) = 1 + \frac{3}{2} + 3 + 1 = 8.5\)
03

Calculate the Confidence Interval (a, b) for Part (a)

We need to find \(a\) and \(b\) such that \(P\{a \leq Y \leq b\} \geq 0.9\). To do this, we can use the empirical rule to approximate the confidence interval. The empirical rule states that in a normal distribution, approximately: - 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean. - 95% of the data falls within two standard deviations of the mean. - 99.7% of the data falls within three standard deviations of the mean. Since we want at least 90% certainty, we can use two standard deviations from the mean. Note that this approximation should only be used if large numbers are involved (which might not be ideal for this case) and no other exact method is available. Let's assume the standard deviation \(\sigma(Y) = 2\). Thus the interval is: \((a, b) = (E(Y) - 2\sigma(Y), E(Y) + 2\sigma(Y))\) \((a, b) = (8.5 - 4, 8.5 + 4)\) \((a, b) = (4.5, 12.5)\)
04

Calculate the Number of Fish using Chebyshev's Inequality for Part (b)

We need to be at least 90% certain of obtaining at least one of each type using the one-sided Chebyshev inequality, which is given by: \[ P(Y \geq E(Y) - k\sigma(Y)) \geq 1 - \frac{1}{k^2}\] We want at least 90% certainty, which means: \[ 1 - \frac{1}{k^2} \geq 0.9\] \[ \frac{1}{k^2} \leq 0.1\] \[ k^2 \geq 10\] \[ k \geq \sqrt{10}\] Now, calculate \(Y\): \[ Y \geq E(Y) - k\sigma(Y)\] \[ Y \geq 8.5 - \sqrt{10} \cdot 2\] Approximately, we get: \[ Y \geq 8.5 - 6.32\] \[ Y \geq 2.18\] So, we need to plan on catching at least 3 fish to be at least 90% certain of obtaining at least one of each type using the one-sided Chebyshev inequality. Note that the answer may differ from part (a) since the approximation in part (a) was based on the empirical rule while part (b) used the one-sided Chebyshev inequality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Chebyshev Inequality
Understanding the Chebyshev inequality is pivotal for students grappling with probability. This principle is an invaluable tool when we lack detailed knowledge about a distribution's shape. It provides a way to say how

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

From past experience, a professor knows that the test score of a student taking her final examination is a random variable with mean 75 (a) Give an upper bound for the probability that a student's test score will exceed \(85 .\) Suppose, in addition, that the professor knows that the variance of a student's test score is equal to 25 (b) What can be said about the probability that a student will score between 65 and \(85 ?\) (c) How many students would have to take the examination to ensure, with probability at least \(.9,\) that the class average would be within 5 of \(75 ?\) Do not use the central limit theorem.

We have 100 components that we will put in use in a sequential fashion. That is, component 1 is initially put in use, and upon failure, it is replaced by component \(2,\) which is itself replaced upon failure by component \(3,\) and so on. If the lifetime of component \(i\) is exponcntially distributed with mean \(10+i / 10, i=1, \ldots, 100,\) estimate the probability that the total life of all components will exceed \(1200 .\) Now repeat when the life distribution of componcnt \(i\) is uniformly distributcd over \((0,20+i / 5), i=1, \dots, 100\)

Let \(X\) be a nonnegative random variable. Prove that $$E[X] \leq\left(E\left[X^{2}\right]\right)^{1 / 2} \leq\left(E\left[X^{3}\right]\right)^{1 / 3} \leq \dots$$

Civil engineers believe that \(W\), the amount of weight (in units of 1000 pounds) that a certain span of a bridge can withstand without structural damage resulting, is normally distributed with mean 400 and standard deviation \(40 .\) Suppose that the weight (again, in units of 1000 pounds) of a car is a random variable with mean 3 and standard deviation \(3 .\) Approximately how many cars would have to be on the bridge span for the probability of structural damage to exceed \(.1 ?\)

If \(X\) is a nonnegative random variable with mean \(25,\) what can be said about (a) \(E\left[X^{3}\right] ?\) (b) \(E[\sqrt{X}] ?\) (c) \(\quad E[\log , X] ?\) (d) \(E\left[e^{-X}\right] ?\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.