/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Let \(X\) be a nonnegative rando... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Let \(X\) be a nonnegative random variable. Prove that $$ E[X] \leq\left(E\left[X^{2}\right]\right)^{1 / 2} \leq\left(E\left[X^{3}\right]\right)^{1 / 3} \leq \cdots $$

Short Answer

Expert verified
To prove the inequality \(E[X] \leq\left(E\left[X^{2}\right]\right)^{1 / 2} \leq\left(E\left[X^{3}\right]\right)^{1 / 3} \leq \cdots \), we use Jensen's inequality on the convex exponential function and then apply the AM-GM inequality. We also show that the function \(g(x) = x^{\frac{1}{n}}\) is convex for \(x \geq 0\) by taking the second derivative, and then use Jensen's inequality with this function. The results give us the desired inequality.

Step by step solution

01

Review Jensen's Inequality

Jensen's inequality states that for any convex function \(f\), and any random variable \(X\), the expected value satisfies \(E[f(X)] \geq f(E[X])\).
02

Apply Jensen's Inequality for the exponential function

Let's apply Jensen's inequality to the exponential function \(f(x) = e^x\). Since the exponential function is convex, the inequality holds: \(E[e^X] \geq e^{E[X]}\).
03

Apply AM-GM inequality

By applying the AM-GM inequality, we have: \[ E\left[X^{2}\right]=E\left[X \cdot X\right] \geq E\left[\frac{X+X}{2}\right]^{2}=\left(\frac{E\left[2 X\right]}{2}\right)^{2}=\left(E[X]\right)^{2} \] Taking the square root of both sides, we get: \[ \left(E\left[X^{2}\right]\right)^{1 / 2} \geq E[X] \] We have proved the first part of the inequality.
04

Prove the second part of the inequality

To prove the remaining parts of the inequality, let's recall the definition of a convex function. A function \(g(x)\) is convex if for any two points \(x, y\) and \(0 \leq \lambda \leq 1\), \(g(\lambda x + (1 - \lambda) y) \leq \lambda g(x) + (1 - \lambda) g(y)\). Consider the function \(g(x) = x^{\frac{1}{n}}\), where n is a positive integer. We want to prove that \(g(x)\) is convex for \(x \geq 0\) in order to make use of Jensen's inequality. Let's show this by taking the second derivative of \(g(x)\). Calculate \(g'(x)\) and \(g''(x)\): \[ g'(x) = \frac{1}{n} x^{\frac{1}{n} - 1} \] \[ g''(x) = \frac{1}{n\left(n-1\right)} x^{\frac{1}{n} - 2} \] Since n is a positive integer, the second derivative of \(g(x)\) is non-negative for all \(x \geq 0\), and thus \(g(x)\) is convex for \(x \geq 0\). Now apply Jensen's inequality with \(g(x) = x^{\frac{1}{n}}\): \[ E\left[g(X)\right] = E\left[X^{\frac{1}{n}}\right] \geq g\left(E\left[X\right]\right) = \left(E\left[X\right]\right)^{\frac{1}{n}} \] Raising both sides of the inequality to the power of n gives: \[ \left(E\left[X^{\frac{1}{n}}\right]\right)^{n} \geq \left(E\left[X\right]\right) \] We have proved the second part of the inequality. Putting it all together: \[ E[X] \leq\left(E\left[X^{2}\right]\right)^{1 / 2} \leq\left(E\left[X^{3}\right]\right)^{1 / 3} \leq \cdots \]

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Jensen's Inequality
Understanding Jensen's inequality is critical for grasping various mathematical and statistical concepts, including expectation inequalities. In simple terms, Jensen's inequality states that if you have a convex function, think of it as a shape resembling a smiley face, and you take any random variable, the expected value of the function applied to the variable should always be greater than or equal to the function of the expected value of the variable. That is, for a convex function \(f\) and a random variable \(X\), the rule is \(E[f(X)] \geq f(E[X])\).

In the given textbook exercise solution, this inequality is applied directly to different powers of \(X\) to prove a chain of inequalities. It shows that the average output from the function is at least as large as plugging in the average input, which is intuitively akin to saying that the whole is at least as much as the average of its parts when considering the output values of a convex function.
AM-GM Inequality
The arithmetic mean-geometric mean (AM-GM) inequality is a fundamental concept in algebra that compares two ways to average numbers: the arithmetic mean (simply the usual average) and the geometric mean (the nth root of the product of n numbers). Specifically, the AM-GM inequality says that for any list of nonnegative real numbers, the arithmetic mean is always greater than or equal to the geometric mean. To express this more formally, for positive numbers \(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n\), the inequality is written as:
  • \(\frac{a_1 + a_2 + \ldots + a_n}{n} \geq \sqrt[n]{a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdot \ldots \cdot a_n}\).

It highlights the idea that spreading out a set of numbers tends to increase their product. In our exercise, by interpreting \(X^2\) as \(X \cdot X\), we can use it to prove that the quadratic expected value is at least the square of the expected value, hence the resulting inequality \(\left(E\left[X^2\right]\right)^{1/2} \geq E[X]\).
Convex Functions
Convex functions play a pivotal role in optimization, economics, and various other fields due to their amazing properties. A function \(g(x)\) is called convex if, for any two points on its graph, the line segment joining them lies above the graph. Mathematically, for any points \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) and any \(\lambda\) between 0 and 1 inclusive, the function satisfies the condition \(g(\lambda x_1 + (1 - \lambda) x_2) \leq \lambda g(x_1) + (1 - \lambda) g(x_2)\).

This definition is nicely visualized by imagining creating a 'line' from one point on a curve to another, and the curve stays beneath this line. For the exercise, proving that a function is convex often involves taking the second derivative of the function, as a nonnegative second derivative is a hallmark of convexity. Once we prove a function is convex, we can leverage Jensen's inequality to establish various important results in mathematics, as shown in the solution for the exercise.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Many people believe that the daily change of price of a company's stock on the stock market is a random variable with mean 0 and variance \(\sigma^{2}\). That is, if \(Y_{n}\) represents the price of the stock on the \(n\)th day, then $$ Y_{n}=Y_{n-1}+X_{n} \quad n \geq 1 $$ where \(X_{1}, X_{2}, \ldots\) are independent and identically distributed random variables with mean 0 and variance \(\sigma^{2}\). Suppose that the stock's price today is 100 . If \(\sigma^{2}=1\), what can you say about the probability that the stock's price will exceed 105 after 10 days?

From past experience a professor knows that the test score of a student taking her final examination is a random variable with mean 75 . (a) Give an upper bound for the probability that a student's test score will exceed \(85 .\) Suppose, in addition, the professor knows that the variance of a student's test score is equal to 25 . (b) What can be said about the probability that a student will score between 65 and 85 ? (c) How many students would have to take the examination to ensure, with probability at least 9 , that the class average would be within 5 of 75 ? Do not use the central limit theorem.

Suppose a fair coin is tossed 1000 times. If the first 100 tosses all result in heads, what proportion of heads would you 'expect on the final 900 tosses? Comment on the statement that "the strong law of large numbers swamps but does not compensate."

Fifty numbers are rounded off to the nearest integer and then summed. If the individual round-off errors are uniformly distributed over \((-.5, .5)\) what is the probability that the resultant sum differs from the exact sum by more than 3 ?

The servicing of a machine requires two separate steps, with the time needed for the first step being an exponential random variable with mean \(.2\) hour and the time for the second step being an independent exponential random variable with mean \(.3\) hour. If a repairperson has 20 machines to service, approximate the probability that all the work can be completed in 8 hours.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.