/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 25 Consider the Helmholtz equation ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Consider the Helmholtz equation $$ -\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial y^{2}}\right)-\omega^{2} u=g(x, y) $$ defined in the unit square with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. (a) Suppose this problem is discretized on a uniform grid with step size \(h=1 /(N+1)\) using a five-point scheme as in Example \(7.1\) plus an additional term. Write down the resulting difference method. (b) Call the resulting matrix \(A\). Find a value \(\omega_{c}\) such that for \(\omega^{2}<\omega_{c}^{2}\) and \(h\) arbitrarily small, \(A\) is still positive definite, but for \(\omega^{2}>\omega_{c}^{2}\) the positive definiteness is lost. (c) Solve the problem for \(\omega=1\) and \(\omega=10\) for \(N=2^{7}-1\) using an appropriate preconditioned Krylov subspace method of your choice, or a multigrid method. Use tol = 1.e-6. Verify that the last residual norm is below tol and tell us how many iterations it took to get there.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The critical value \(\omega_c^2\) represents a threshold for the frequency squared \(\omega^2\) in the Helmholtz equation. If \(\omega^2\) is smaller than \(\omega_c^2\), the matrix A remains positive definite, which guarantees that the iterative methods for solving the linear system converge. Positive definiteness of the matrix A is important because it ensures that the potential solution is not only unique but also stable, and it guarantees the convergence of algorithms used to solve the linear system.

Step by step solution

01

Discretization of Helmholtz Equation using Five-Point Scheme

Using the five-point scheme, the Laplacian of \(u\) can be approximated by: $$ \frac{\partial^2u}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2u}{\partial y^2} \approx \frac{u_{i+1,j} - 2u_{i,j} + u_{i-1,j}}{h^2}+ \frac{u_{i,j+1} - 2u_{i,j} + u_{i,j-1}}{h^2} $$ Now, we discretize the given Helmholtz Equation using this scheme and add the additional term: $$ - \left( \frac{u_{i+1,j} - 2u_{i,j} + u_{i-1,j}}{h^2}+ \frac{u_{i,j+1} - 2u_{i,j} + u_{i,j-1}}{h^2} \right) - \omega^2 u_{i,j} = g_{i,j} $$ This is the resulting difference method for the discretized problem.
02

Find \(\omega_c\)

To determine \(\omega_c\), we will analyze the eigenvalues of the resulting matrix \(A\). The matrix A is symmetric, and for positive definiteness, all its eigenvalues must be positive. The eigenvalues of \(A\) are of the form: $$ \lambda_{nm} = \frac{-4}{h^2}\left( \sin^2\left(\frac{n\pi h}{2}\right) + \sin^2\left(\frac{m\pi h}{2}\right) \right) - \omega^2 $$ To find the critical value \(\omega_c\) such that the matrix A retains positive definiteness, we need \(\omega_c^2\) to satisfy the following inequality: $$ \omega_c^2 > \max_{n,m}\left(\frac{-4}{h^2}\left( \sin^2\left(\frac{n\pi h}{2}\right) + \sin^2\left(\frac{m\pi h}{2}\right) \right)\right) $$ By solving this inequality, we obtain \(\omega_c^2 = 2N\pi^2\).
03

Solve the Problem with \(\omega=1\) and \(\omega=10\)

To solve the problem for \(\omega=1\) and \(\omega=10\) with preconditioned Krylov subspace or multigrid methods, we can use MATLAB and follow these steps: 1. Create the matrix A and right-hand side matrix g(x, y) using the discretized Helmholtz equation and given boundary conditions. 2. Choose an appropriate preconditioner (e.g., incomplete LU factorization) and set a tolerance of 1.e-6. 3. Use the preconditioned Krylov subspace method (such as GMRES or BiCG-STAB) or a multigrid method available in MATLAB to solve the linear system Ax = g(x, y). 4. Report the number of iterations it took to achieve the specified tolerance and check that the last residual norm is below the tolerance. Implementing these steps in MATLAB and observing the number of iterations for each case will complete this step.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Helmholtz Equation
The Helmholtz equation is a fundamental partial differential equation often encountered in physics and engineering. In its simplest form, it is given by:\[ -\left(\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial y^{2}}\right)-\omega^{2} u=g(x, y) \]This equation describes how physical fields, such as acoustic, electromagnetic, or pressure fields, propagate with time and space. The term \(\omega\) represents the angular frequency, and \(g(x, y)\) acts as a source term.The Helmholtz equation is particularly significant in areas like wave propagation, where solutions represent wave functions. In boundary value problems, it requires specific conditions on the domain's boundary, such as homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions where the function assumes zero values on the boundary.Understanding its solution involves converting it into a solvable numerical form, which is especially useful in complex-shaped domains or for high frequencies \(\omega\). This leads us to discretization methods, one of which is the five-point scheme.
Five-point Scheme
The five-point scheme is a popular finite difference method used to discretize partial differential equations, such as the Helmholtz equation. It provides an efficient way to approximate the Laplacian operator, which is a common component in these equations.For the Helmholtz equation, the five-point scheme approximates the Laplacian as follows:
  • Central point \(u_{i,j}\) interacts with its four immediate neighbors: right \(u_{i+1,j}\), left \(u_{i-1,j}\), above \(u_{i,j+1}\), and below \(u_{i,j-1}\).
  • The discretization formula is \[ - \left( \frac{u_{i+1,j} - 2u_{i,j} + u_{i-1,j}}{h^2}+ \frac{u_{i,j+1} - 2u_{i,j} + u_{i,j-1}}{h^2} \right) - \omega^2 u_{i,j} = g_{i,j} \] where \(h\) is the grid step size.
  • This transforms the continuous problem into a grid-based system of equations, which can be tackled using numerical methods.
This discretization converts differential equations into algebraic ones, enabling computer algorithms to find approximations of the solution across the grid.
Positive Definiteness
Positive definiteness is a crucial property in linear algebra, especially when working with matrices resulting from discretizing differential equations. A matrix \(A\) is positive definite if all its eigenvalues are positive, ensuring stability and uniqueness of solutions.For the resulting matrix \(A\) from the discretized Helmholtz equation, positive definiteness depends on the parameter \(\omega\). Specifically, we seek the critical value \(\omega_c\) beyond which positive definiteness is compromised.To ensure \(A\) remains positive definite, we analyze its eigenvalues:
  • \(\lambda_{nm} = \frac{-4}{h^2}\left( \sin^2\left(\frac{n\pi h}{2}\right) + \sin^2\left(\frac{m\pi h}{2}\right) \right) - \omega^2\).
  • The critical condition is \(\omega_c^2 > \max_{n,m}\left(\frac{-4}{h^2}\left( \sin^2\left(\frac{n\pi h}{2}\right) + \sin^2\left(\frac{m\pi h}{2}\right) \right)\right)\).
  • Solving the inequality gives \(\omega_c^2 = 2N\pi^2\).
Maintaining positive definiteness ensures the matrix equations derived from the discretized Helmholtz equation remain solvable without numerical instability.
Preconditioned Krylov Subspace Methods
Preconditioned Krylov subspace methods are advanced iterative techniques used for solving large systems of linear equations, especially those derived from discretizing partial differential equations like the Helmholtz equation.These methods, such as GMRES or BiCG-STAB, are employed in scenarios where direct methods are computationally expensive.

Key Features:

  • Preconditioning: Enhances convergence by transforming the original problem into one that is easier to solve.
  • Iterative Nature: Characters of the solution are progressively approximated within a subspace, refining each iteration.
  • Efficiency: Particularly useful for large, sparse matrices like those formed by the five-point scheme discretization.
For the problem at hand, choosing an appropriate preconditioner, such as incomplete LU factorization, is essential. This boosts the efficiency of solving for \(\omega = 1\) and \(\omega = 10\), providing a solution that meets a specified tolerance and requires fewer iterations.Using Matlab or similar computational environments, these methods iteratively solve the equation \(Ax = g(x, y)\), ensuring the residual norm is below a set tolerance, indicating an accurate solution.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A skew-symmetric matrix is a matrix \(S\) that satisfies $$ s^{T}=-S $$ (a) Show that for any general matrix \(A\), the matrix \(\left(A-A^{T}\right) / 2\) is skew-symmetric. (This matrix is in fact referred to as the "skew- symmetric part" of \(A\).) (b) Show that the diagonal of a skew-symmetric matrix \(S\) must be zero component-wise. (c) Show that the eigenvalues of \(S\) must be purely imaginary. (d) If \(S\) is \(n \times n\) with \(n\) an odd number, then it is necessarily singular. Why? (e) Suppose that the skew-symmetric \(S\) is nonsingular and sparse. In the process of solving a linear system associated with \(S\), a procedure equivalent to Arnoldi or Lanczos is applied to form an orthogonal basis for the corresponding Krylov subspace. Suppose the resulting matrices satisfy the relation $$ S Q_{k}=Q_{k+1} U_{k+1, k} $$ where \(Q_{k}\) is an \(n \times k\) matrix whose orthonormal columns form the basis for the Krylov subspace, \(Q_{k+1}\) is the matrix of basis vectors containing also the \((k+1)\) st basis vector, and \(U_{k+1, k}\) is a \((k+1) \times k\) matrix. i. Determine the nonzero structure of \(U_{k+1, k} .\) Specifically, state whether it is tridiagonal or upper Hessenberg, and explain what can be said about the values along the main diagonal. ii. Preconditioners for systems with a dominant skew-symmetric part often deal with the possibility of singularity by solving a shifted skew-symmetric system, where instead of solving for \(S\) one solves for \(S+\beta_{k} I\) with \(\beta_{k}\) a scalar. Suppose we have the same right-hand-side, but we need to solve the system for several values of \(\beta_{k}\). Can the Arnoldi or Lanczos type procedure outlined above be applied once and for all and then be easily adapted? iii. Describe the main steps of a MINRES-like method for solving a skew- symmetric linear system.

(a) Show that if the square matrix \(A\) is strictly diagonally dominant, then the Jacobi relaxation yields an iteration matrix that satisfies $$ \|T\|_{\infty}<1 $$ (b) Show that if \(A\) is a \(2 \times 2\) symmetric positive definite matrix, the Jacobi scheme converges for any initial guess.

Consider the problem described in Example \(7.1\), where the boundary condition \(u(0, y)=0\) is replaced by $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(0, y)=0 $$ (Example 4.17 considers such a change in one variable, but here life is harder.) Correspondingly, we change the conditions \(u_{0, j}=0, j=1, \ldots, N\), into $$ 4 u_{0, j}-2 u_{1, j}-u_{0, j+1}-u_{0, j-1}=b_{0, j}, \quad 1 \leq j \leq N $$ where still \(u_{0,0}=u_{0, N+1}=0\). You don't need to know for the purposes of this exercise why these new linear relations make sense, only that \(N\) new unknowns and \(N\) new conditions have been introduced. (a) What is the vector of unknowns u now? What is \(\mathbf{b}\) ? What is the dimension of the system? (b) What does \(A\) look like? [Hint: This exercise may not be easy; do it for the case \(N=3\) first!]

Write a program that solves the problem of Example \(7.13\) for \(N=127\) and \(N=255\) using a multigrid method. The script in that example and the code for a V-cycle in Section \(7.6\) should prove useful with appropriate modification. Set your coarsest level (where the problem is solved exactly, say, by a direct solver) to \(N=31\). You should be able to obtain considerably faster convergence than in Example \(7.13\) at the price of a considerable headache.

Let \(A\) be a general nonsymmetric nonsingular square matrix, and consider the following two alternatives. The first is applying GMRES to solve the linear system \(A \mathbf{x}=\mathbf{b} ;\) the second is applying CG to the normal equations $$ A^{T} A \mathbf{x}=A^{T} \mathbf{b} $$ We briefly discussed this in Section \(7.5\); the method we mentioned in that context was CGLS. (a) Suppose your matrix \(A\) is nearly orthogonal. Which of the two solvers is expected to converge faster? (b) Suppose your matrix is block diagonal relative to \(2 \times 2\) blocks, where the \(j\) th block is given by $$ \left(\begin{array}{cc} 1 & j-1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right) $$ with \(j=1, \ldots, n / 2\). Which of the two solvers is expected to converge faster? [Hint: Consider the eigenvalues and the singular values of the matrices.]

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.