Chapter 17: Problem 3
Let \(G\) be the set of maps from \(\mathbf{R}\) to \(\mathbf{R}\) of the form \(\vartheta_{a, b}\) (with \(a, b \in \mathbf{R}\) and \(a \neq 0\) ) where \(\vartheta_{n, b}(x)=a x+b .\) Show that \(G\) is a group under composition of maps and that the subset \(\left\\{\vartheta_{1, e}: e \in \mathbf{R}\right\\}\) is an abelian subgroup of \(G . \mathrm{By}\) considering commutators, or otherwise, deduce that \(G\) is a soluble group.
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Verify Closure Under Composition
Check Identity Element
Verify Inverses Exist
Verify Associativity
Show the Subset is an Abelian Group
Show G is Soluble
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Group Closure
In the given problem, we have transformations of the form \( \vartheta_{a,b}(x) = ax + b \). To verify closure, consider two such maps, say \( \vartheta_{a,b} \) and \( \vartheta_{c,d} \). Their composition is \( (\vartheta_{a, b} \circ \vartheta_{c, d})(x) = a(cx + d) + b = acx + ad + b \), which can be rewritten as another map of the form \( \vartheta_{ac, ad+b}(x) \).
Since \( ac eq 0 \) (because \( a eq 0 \) and \( c eq 0 \)), this new map is also in \( G \). Therefore, \( G \) is closed under composition, satisfying the closure property of a group.
Identity Element
For the set \( G \) of transformations \( \vartheta_{a,b}(x) = ax + b \), the map \( \vartheta_{1,0}(x) = x \) is the identity element. This is because, when you compose any other map \( \vartheta_{a,b} \) with \( \vartheta_{1,0} \), the result is \( \vartheta_{1,0} \circ \vartheta_{a,b}(x) = ax + b \) and \( \vartheta_{a,b} \circ \vartheta_{1,0}(x) = ax + b \).
Thus, \( \vartheta_{1,0} \) does not alter any map \( \vartheta_{a,b} \), confirming its role as the identity element in \( G \).
Inverse Function
For an element \( \vartheta_{a,b} \) in \( G \), the inverse map \( \vartheta_{a, b}^{-1}(x) \) must satisfy the condition that \( (\vartheta_{a, b} \circ \vartheta_{a, b}^{-1})(x) = x \). From the equation \( ax + b = y \), solving for \( x \) gives \( x = \frac{y - b}{a} \). Therefore, the inverse function is \( \vartheta_{a^{-1}, -\frac{b}{a}}(x) = \frac{x - b}{a} \).
This map is also of the required form, ensuring each transformation in \( G \) has its inverse, reaffirming the group property of having inverses for all elements.
Associativity
For our transformation group \( G \), consider three elements \( \vartheta_{a,b}, \vartheta_{c,d}, \) and \( \vartheta_{e,f} \). Their compositions yield the same result whether we compute \( \vartheta_{a,b} \circ (\vartheta_{c,d} \circ \vartheta_{e,f}) \) or \( (\vartheta_{a,b} \circ \vartheta_{c,d}) \circ \vartheta_{e,f} \), both simplifying to \( a(cex + (cd+f)) + b \).
This proves the associativity condition, thus supporting \( G \)'s status as a group with respect to function composition.
Abelian Subgroup
Within \( G \), consider the subset \( \{\vartheta_{1,e}: e \in \mathbb{R}\} \), where each transformation is of the form \( x + e \). These transformations commute under composition, as shown by \( (\vartheta_{1, e} \circ \vartheta_{1, f})(x) = x + e + f = (\vartheta_{1, f} \circ \vartheta_{1, e})(x) \).
This subset not only possesses an identity element, \( \vartheta_{1,0} \), but also for each element \( \vartheta_{1,e} \), there exists an inverse \( \vartheta_{1,-e} \). Therefore, this subset is an Abelian subgroup of \( G \), where all operations commute and every element and its inverse are accounted for.