/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 (Quadratic convergence of the Ne... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

(Quadratic convergence of the Newton method) Let \(f:[a, b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be a differentiable function such that \(f^{\prime}\) is continuous on \([a, b], f^{\prime}(x) \neq 0\) for all \(x \in[a, b], f^{\prime \prime}\) exists and is bounded on \((a, b)\). If \(f(r)=0\) for some \(r \in[a, b]\), then show that \(r\) is the unique solution of \(f(x)=0\) in \([a, b]\) and there is a constant \(\alpha \in \mathbb{R}\) such that for any Newton sequence \(\left(x_{n}\right)\) for \(f\) with its initial point \(x_{0}\) in \([a, b]\), $$ \left|x_{n}-r\right| \leq \alpha\left|x_{n-1}-r\right|^{2}, \quad \text { provided } x_{n-1}, x_{n} \in[a, b] . $$ Deduce that \(\left|x_{n}-r\right| \leq \alpha^{2^{n}-1}\left|x_{0}-r\right|^{2^{n}}\), provided \(x_{1}, \ldots, x_{n} \in[a, b]\). [Note: In case \(\alpha<1\), the former inequality shows that the terms of the Newton sequence give a successively better approximation of the solution \(r\) of \(f(x)=0 .\) This inequality can also be interpreted to say that the Newton sequence converges quadratically.]

Short Answer

Expert verified
We have shown that under the given conditions (f being differentiable on [a, b], f'(x) being continuous and non-zero on [a, b], and f''(x) being bounded), there exists a unique solution r of f(x) = 0 in [a, b]. We defined the Newton sequence and proved that for any n-th and (n-1)-th terms of the sequence, \(|x_n - r| \leq \alpha |x_{n-1} - r|^2\), provided \(x_{n-1}, x_n \in [a, b]\). Finally, we showed that \(|x_n - r| \leq \alpha^{2^n - 1}|x_0 - r|^{2^n}\) for all n, provided \(x_1, \ldots, x_n \in [a, b]\). This proves the quadratic convergence of the Newton method under the given conditions.

Step by step solution

01

Show unique solution of f(x) = 0 in [a, b]

Since f'(x) is continuous and non-zero on [a, b], it has the same sign throughout this interval. Suppose f'(x) > 0 on [a, b]. Then, f is strictly increasing on [a, b]. Given that f(r) = 0 for some r in [a, b], we can say that f(x) < 0 for x < r and f(x) > 0 for x > r. Therefore, the function f has only one root (r) in [a, b]. The case when f'(x) < 0 can be shown similarly.
02

Define the Newton sequence

The Newton sequence \((x_n)\) for the function f can be defined as follows: $$ x_{n+1} = x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}, \quad n \geq 0 $$ with the initial guess \(x_0\) in [a, b]. We will prove that this sequence converges quadratically to the unique root r.
03

Show that |x_n - r|

Define the constant α as: $$ \alpha = \max_{x \in (a, b)} \frac{1}{2}\left|\frac{f''(x)}{f'(x)}\right| $$ Since f''(x) is bounded on (a, b), α is finite. For any (n-1)-th term and n-th term of the Newton sequence, consider the Taylor expansion of f around \(x_{n-1}\): $$ f(x) \approx f(x_{n-1}) + f'(x_{n-1})(x - x_{n-1}) + \frac{1}{2}f''(c)(x - x_{n-1})^2 $$ where c is between x and \(x_{n-1}\). Now, let's replace x by r and analyze the term \(|x_n - r|\). We know that: $$ x_n = x_{n-1} - \frac{f(x_{n-1})}{f'(x_{n-1})} $$ So, $$ x_n - r = x_{n - 1} - r - \frac{f(x_{n-1})}{f'(x_{n-1})} $$ From the Taylor expansion, $$ f(x_{n-1}) = -f'(x_{n-1})(r - x_{n-1}) + \frac{1}{2}f''(c")(r - x_{n-1})^2 $$ where c" is between r and \(x_{n-1}\). Thus, $$ x_n - r = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{f''(c")}{f'(c")}(r - x_{n-1})^2 $$ and $$ \left|x_n - r\right| \leq \alpha \left|x_{n-1} - r\right|^2 $$ provided \(x_{n-1}, x_n \in [a, b]\).
04

Prove that |x_n - r|

We will prove this inequality by induction. Base case (n = 1): $$ \left|x_1 - r\right| \leq \alpha|x_0 - r|^2 $$ which is true from the previous step. Inductive step: Assume that the inequality holds for n = k. Now, we need to show it holds for n = k + 1. $$ \left|x_{k+1} - r\right| \leq \alpha\left|x_k - r\right|^2 $$ Using the inductive hypothesis, we can substitute the term \(\left|x_{k} - r\right|\): $$ \left|x_{k+1} - r\right| \leq \alpha\left(\alpha^{2^k - 1}\left|x_0 - r\right|^{2^k}\right)^2 $$ which simplifies to $$ \left|x_{k+1} - r\right| \leq \alpha^{2^{k+1} - 1}\left|x_0 - r\right|^{2^{k+1}} $$ Therefore, the inequality holds for all n, provided \(x_1, \ldots, x_n \in [a, b]\). The fact that \(\left|x_n - r\right|\) decreases quadratically at each step implies that the Newton sequence converges quadratically to the unique root r under the given conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Quadratic Convergence
In the world of numerical methods, Newton's Method is well known for its fast convergence, specifically quadratic convergence. What does this mean? Simply put, if you start close enough to the root, Newton's method doubles the number of correct digits in each step. Let’s break this down further:

  • For each iteration in Newton's sequence, the error (the distance between your guess and the actual root) gets squared.
  • This means the error diminishes rapidly, leading to a highly accurate approximation in just a few steps.
Quadratic convergence is mathematically represented as \[ |x_{n} - r| \leq \alpha |x_{n-1} - r|^2 \] where \(x_{n}\) is the nth approximation, \(r\) is the actual root, and \(\alpha\) is a constant based on the function. This showcases the power of quadratic convergence in providing precise solutions efficiently.
Uniqueness of Solutions
The uniqueness of a solution refers to the condition where only one root exists in the given interval. For the function \( f(x) = 0 \) within the interval \([a, b]\), if \(f'(x)\) is continuous and non-zero, the solution is unique. Here's why:

  • \(f'(x)\) as non-zero across the entire range implies the function is strictly monotonic, either strictly increasing or decreasing.
  • Given \(f(r) = 0\), if \(f'(x) \gt 0\), then \(f(x)\) transitions from negative to positive as \(x\) passes through \(r\).
  • This unique crossing indicates that \(r\) is the only point where \(f(x) = 0\) in the interval.
This concept guarantees that Newton’s method can reliably locate the correct root in the specified interval, highlighting its effectiveness in practical applications.
Taylor Expansion
Taylor expansion offers a way to approximate a function near a specific point using polynomials. It’s crucial for understanding why Newton's method works so well. Here's the process:

  • The function \(f(x)\) can be approximated around a point \(x_{n-1}\) using the Taylor series: \[ f(x) \approx f(x_{n-1}) + f'(x_{n-1})(x - x_{n-1}) + \frac{1}{2}f''(c)(x - x_{n-1})^2 \]
  • This formula breaks down complicated functions into simpler, easily analyzable pieces, using derivatives at \(x_{n-1}\).
In Newton’s method, we specifically exploit the linear part of this series, which simplifies finding roots effectively. The quadratic term contributes to the rapid convergence rate by squaring the error each step.
Inductive Proof
Inductive proof is a powerful technique to demonstrate that a property holds for every member of an infinite sequence, crucial for validating the performance of algorithms like Newton’s Method.

The proof structure consists of:

  • **Base Case:** The statement is proven for the initial "n" (often \(n = 1\) or \(n = 0\)). In Newton’s Method, it involves showing the initial approximation satisfies the desired inequality for quadratic convergence.
  • **Inductive Step:** Assuming the statement holds for \(n = k\), it must be shown true for \(n = k + 1\). For Newton’s Method, we assume \(|x_k - r|\) satisfies the inequality, showing it leads to the same inequality for \(|x_{k+1} - r|\).
This methodically proves that each subsequent approximation is increasingly close to the root, validating Newton’s Method's quadratic convergence property and ensuring confidence in its efficacy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let \(I\) be an interval in \(\mathbb{R}, f: I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\), and let \(c\) be an interior point of \(I\). (i) Suppose there is \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(f^{(2 n)}\) exists at \(c\), and \(f^{\prime}(c)=f^{\prime \prime}(c)=\) \(\cdots=f^{(2 n-1)}(c)=0 .\) If \(f^{(2 n)}(c)<0\), then show that \(f\) has a strict local maximum at \(c\), whereas if \(f^{(2 n)}(c)>0\), then show that \(f\) has a strict local minimum at \(c\). (Hint: Taylor Formula.) (ii) Suppose there is \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(f^{(2 n+1)}\) exists at \(c\), and \(f^{\prime \prime}(c)=\) \(f^{\prime \prime \prime}(c)=\cdots=f^{(2 n)}(c)=0 .\) If \(f^{(2 n+1)}(c) \neq 0\), then show that \(c\) is a strict point of inflection for \(f\). (Hint: Taylor Formula.) (iii) Suppose that \(f\) is infinitely differentiable at \(c\) and \(f^{\prime}(c)=0\), but \(f^{(k)}(c) \neq 0\) for some \(k \in \mathbb{N}\). Show that either \(f\) has a strict local extremum at \(c\), or \(c\) is a strict point of inflection for \(f\).

Consider \(f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) defined by \(f(x)=x^{4}-x^{3}-75 .\) Show that there is a unique \(r_{1} \in[3,4]\) such that \(f\left(r_{1}\right)=0\) and there is a unique \(r_{2} \in[-3,-2]\) such that \(f\left(r_{2}\right)=0\). Use the Newton method with initial point (i) \(x_{0}=3\) (ii) \(x_{0}=-3\), to find approximate values of the solutions \(r_{1}\) and \(r_{2}\) of \(f(x)=0\).

Let \(D \subseteq \mathbb{R}\) and let \(c\) be an interior point of \(D .\) If \(f: D \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is twice differentiable at \(c\) and \(f^{\prime \prime}(c) \neq 0\), then prove that \(f\) has a local extremum at \(c\) if and only if \(f^{\prime}(c)=0\)

A post office will accept a box for shipment only if the sum of its length and its girth (that is, the distance around) does not exceed 84 inches. Find the dimensions of the largest acceptable box with a square end.

Let \(f:(a, b) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be a differentiable function such that \(f^{\prime}\) is bounded on \((a, b)\), and \(f\) has a root \(r \in(a, b) .\) For \(x \in(a, b), x \neq r\), let \(J_{x}\) denote the open interval between \(r\) and \(x .\) Assume that if \(f(x)>0\), then \(f\) is convex on \(J_{x}\), while if \(f(x)<0\), then \(f\) is concave on \(J_{x} .\) Show that the Newton sequence with any initial point \(x_{0} \in(a, b)\) converges to a root of \(f\) in \((a, b)\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.