Chapter 4: Problem 40
Consider the following application of L'Hôpital's Rule: $$ \lim _{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{3 x^{2}-2 x-1}{x^{2}-x}=\lim _{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{6 x-2}{2 x-1}=\lim _{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{6}{2}=3 $$ Is it correct? Justify.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 4: Problem 40
Consider the following application of L'Hôpital's Rule: $$ \lim _{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{3 x^{2}-2 x-1}{x^{2}-x}=\lim _{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{6 x-2}{2 x-1}=\lim _{x \rightarrow 1} \frac{6}{2}=3 $$ Is it correct? Justify.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Let \(a>0\) and \(f:[-a, a] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be continuous. Suppose \(f^{\prime}(x)\) exists and \(f^{\prime}(x) \leq 1\) for all \(x \in(-a, a)\). If \(f(a)=a\) and \(f(-a)=-a\), then show that \(f(x)=x\) for every \(x \in(-a, a)\).
Let \(C\) be an algebraic plane curve, that is, let \(C\) be implicitly defined by \(F(x, y)=0\), where \(F(x, y)\) is a nonzero polynomial in two variables \(x\) and \(y\) with coefficients in \(\mathbb{R} .\) Let the (total) degree of \(F(x, y)\) be \(n .\) Let \(P=\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)\) be a point on \(C\), so that \(F\left(x_{0}, y_{0}\right)=0 .\) (i) If we let \(X:=x-c\) and \(Y:=y-d\) and define \(g(X, Y):=f(x, y)\), then show that \(g(X, Y)\) is a polynomial in \(X\) and \(Y\) with \(g(0,0)=0\). Deduce that there is a unique \(m \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(m \leq n\) and $$ g(X, Y)=g_{m}(X, Y)+g_{m+1}(X, Y)+\cdots+g_{n}(X, Y) $$ where \(g_{i}(X, Y)\) is either the zero polynomial or a nonzero homogeneous polynomial of degree \(i\), for \(m \leq i \leq n\), and \(g_{m}(X, Y) \neq 0 .\) We denote the integer \(m\) by mult \(_{P}(C)\), and call it the multiplicity of \(C\) at the point \(P\). (ii) Show that a tangent to the curve \(C\) at the point \(P\) is defined (as far as calculus is concerned) if and only if mult \(_{P}(C)=1\). Moreover, if \(\operatorname{mult}_{P}(C)=1\), then there are \(\alpha_{1}, \beta_{1} \in \mathbb{R}\) such that \(g_{1}(X, Y)=\) \(\alpha_{1} X+\beta_{1} Y\), and then the line \(\alpha_{1}(x-c)+\beta_{1}(y-d)=0\) is the tangent to \(C\) at \(P\). (iii) Show that if \(F(x, y)=y-f(x)\) for some polynomial \(f(x)\) in one variable \(x\), then for the corresponding curve \(C\) given by \(F(x, y)=0\) we have mult \(_{P}(C)=1\) for every \(P\) on \(C\). (iv) Determine the integer \(m=\operatorname{mult}_{P}(C)\) and a factorization of \(g_{m}(X, Y)\) when \(P=(0,0)\) and \(C\) is the curve implicitly defined by \(F(x, y):=\) \(y^{2}-x^{2}-x^{3}=0\), or by \(F(x, y):=y^{2}-x^{3}=0\) [Note: In view of Exercise 70 of Chapter 1, the initial form \(g_{m}(X, Y)\) factors as a product of homogeneous linear polynomials, that is, $$ g_{m}(X, Y)=\prod_{i=1}^{m}\left(\alpha_{i} X+\beta_{i} Y\right) \text { for some } \alpha_{i}, \beta_{i} \in \mathbb{C}, 1 \leq i \leq m $$ In the algebraic approach to tangents, the \(m\) (complex) lines given by \(\alpha_{i}(x-c)+\beta_{i}(y-d)=0\) for \(i=1, \ldots, m\), are called the tangent lines to the curve \(C\) at the point \(P .\) ]
Let \(c \in \mathbb{R}, r>0\), and \(f:(c-r, c+r) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be such that \(f^{\prime \prime}(c)\) exists. Show that $$ \lim _{h \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{f(c+h)+f(c-h)-2 f(c)}{h^{2}} $$ exists and is equal to \(f^{\prime \prime}(c) .\) Give an example of a function that is differentiable on \((c-r, c+r)\), for which this limit exists, but \(f^{\prime \prime}(c)\) does not exist.
Given \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), let \(f_{n}: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be defined by \(f_{n}(x):=x^{n}\) if \(x \geq 0\) and \(f_{n}(x):=-x^{n}\) if \(x<0 .\) Show that \(f_{n}\) is \((n-1)\) -times differentiable on \(\mathbb{R}\), \(f_{n}^{(n-1)}\) is continuous on \(\mathbb{R}\), but \(f_{n}^{(n)}(0)\) does not exist.
Give an alternative proof of Taylor's Theorem with a single application of Rolle's Theorem by proceeding as follows. Let the notation and hypothesis be as in the statement of Taylor Theorem (Proposition \(4.23\) ). Also, as in the proof of Taylor's Theorem, for \(x \in[a, b]\), let $$ P(x)=f(a)+f^{\prime}(a)(x-a)+\frac{f^{\prime \prime}(a)}{2 !}(x-a)^{2}+\cdots+\frac{f^{(n)}(a)}{n !}(x-a)^{n} . $$ Define \(g:[a, b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) by $$ g(x)=f(x)+f^{\prime}(x)(b-x)+\frac{f^{\prime \prime}(x)}{2 !}(b-x)^{2}+\cdots+\frac{f^{(n)}(x)}{n !}(b-x)^{n}+s(b-x)^{n+1}, $$ where \(s=[f(b)-P(b)] /(b-a)^{n+1} .\) Show that \(g(a)=g(b)=f(b) .\) Apply Rolle's Theorem to \(g\) to deduce Taylor's Theorem.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.