Chapter 1: Problem 23
Let \(R\) be the real line. Consider the following subsets of the plane \(R
\times R\). \(S=[(x, y): y=x+1\) and \(0
Short Answer
Expert verified
(D) \( T \) is an equivalence relation on \( R \) but \( S \) is not.
Step by step solution
01
Evaluate Set S for Equivalence Properties
To determine if a set is an equivalence relation, it must satisfy reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Set \( S \) is given as \([(x, y): y=x+1 \text{ and } 0<x<2]\). - **Reflexivity**: For any \( x \) in \( R \), \( (x, x) \) must be in \( S \), meaning \( x=x+1 \), which is not possible for any real \( x \). - **Symmetry**: For \( (x, y) \in S \), \( y-x = 1 \). So, \( (y, x) \) would make \( x-y = -1 \), which is not equal, violating symmetry. - **Transitivity**: Given \( (x, y) \) and \( (y, z) \) in \( S \), this would imply \( y = x + 1 \) and \( z = y + 1 \). Therefore, \( z - x \) would be 2, which is not in \( S \). **Conclusion for S**: \( S \) is not an equivalence relation.
02
Evaluate Set T for Equivalence Properties
Set \( T \) is defined as \([(x, y): x-y \text{ is an integer}]\). Let's check the conditions:- **Reflexivity**: For any \( x \) in \( R \), \( (x, x) \) is in \( T \) because \( x - x = 0 \) is an integer.- **Symmetry**: If \( (x, y) \in T \) means \( x - y \) is an integer, then \( y - x \) will also be an integer (since \( x - y = -(y-x) \)), so \( (y, x) \in T \).- **Transitivity**: If \( (x, y) \in T \) and \( (y, z) \in T \), then both \( x-y \) and \( y-z \) are integers. Thus, \( (x-z = (x-y) + (y-z)) \) is also an integer, so \( (x, z) \in T \).**Conclusion for T**: \( T \) is an equivalence relation.
03
Identify the Correct Statement
From our evaluations above, we conclude: - \( S \) is not an equivalence relation because it does not satisfy reflexivity, symmetry, or transitivity.- \( T \) is an equivalence relation because it satisfies all three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.Thus, the correct statement is that \( T \) is an equivalence relation on \( R \) while \( S \) is not.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Real Numbers
Real numbers form a set of numbers that include both rational numbers, like 2 or -5.5, and irrational numbers, such as \( \sqrt{2} \) and pi (\( \pi \)). They cover all points on the infinite number line, extending in both positive and negative directions. Real numbers can be classified into distinct categories:
- Natural Numbers: The counting numbers starting from 1, 2, 3, and so on.
- Whole Numbers: Natural numbers along with zero, so 0, 1, 2, 3, etc.
- Integers: All positive and negative whole numbers, including zero.
- Rational Numbers: Numbers that can be expressed as a fraction \( \frac{a}{b} \), where \( a \) and \( b \) are integers, and \( b eq 0 \).
- Irrational Numbers: Numbers that cannot be written as a simple fraction. These are often decimal numbers that do not terminate or repeat, like \( \sqrt{2} \) or \( \pi \).
Reflexivity
Reflexivity is one of the three critical properties an equivalence relation must satisfy. For a set to be reflexive, each element must relate to itself. Using the mathematical notation, for any element \( x \) in set \( R \), the pair \( (x, x) \) should exist in the relation. For example, considering set \( T = \{ (x, y): x-y \text{ is an integer} \} \), this property is satisfied because for any \( x \), \( x-x = 0 \) is indeed an integer. Thus, every real number is reflexive with itself in set \( T \). However, for set \( S = \{ (x, y): y = x + 1 \} \), reflexivity fails because \( x = x + 1 \) is never true for any real number \( x \). Therefore, this set does not satisfy the reflexivity condition. Reflexivity ensures that every item is in a self-loop when imagined as a vertex in a graph.
Symmetry
Symmetry requires that if an element \( x \) is related to \( y \), then \( y \) should also be related to \( x \). In simpler terms, if \( (x, y) \) is in the relation, \( (y, x) \) must also be part of it.In set \( T = \{ (x, y): x-y \text{ is an integer} \} \), this is satisfied. If \( x - y \) is an integer, then \( y - x \) is also an integer because it is just the negative of \( x - y \). Thus, symmetry holds true in \( T \).Contrarily, in set \( S = \{ (x, y): y = x + 1 \} \), symmetry fails. While \( y = x + 1 \) implies a particular direction from \( x \) to \( y \), reversing this statement results in \( x = y + 1 \), which doesn't hold true for the same pair, violating symmetry. Symmetry ensures a bidirectional relationship in pairs.
Transitivity
Transitivity is the property that if \( x \) is related to \( y \), and \( y \) is related to \( z \), then \( x \) should also be related to \( z \). It's like a chain reaction that connects elements across a set. In set \( T = \{ (x, y): x-y \text{ is an integer} \} \), transitivity holds. If \( x-y \) and \( y-z \) are both integers, then their sum \( x-z = (x-y) + (y-z) \) is also an integer, maintaining the transitive property.Conversely, in set \( S = \{ (x, y): y = x + 1 \} \), transitivity is absent. If \( y = x + 1 \) and \( z = y + 1 \), you get \( z = x + 2 \), not \( x + 1 \), which doesn’t fall back into set \( S \). This missing link shows that \( x \) and \( z \) aren't directly relatable through the same rule, thus, transitivity is not satisfied in set \( S \).