/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 117 The repeal of the Eighteenth Ame... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment, known as Prohibition, meant that alcohol could once again be legally bought and sold. What was the main economic reason the federal government favored its repeal? (A) so the members of the government could get drunk once in a while (B) so the government could stop spending money investigating alcohol smuggling (C) freedom of individual choice (D) so the government could gain revenue from the sales taxes on alcoholic beverages

Short Answer

Expert verified
(D) so the government could gain revenue from the sales taxes on alcoholic beverages

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the options

The question asks for the main economic reason, so let's determine which options either don't represent economic reasons or are less significant in comparison to others: (A) This option is not an economic reason, so we can eliminate it. (B) This option is an economic reason but may not be the most important one. (C) This option is not an economic reason but a social one, so we can eliminate it too. (D) This option is an economic reason, and it could be significant.
02

Compare the remaining options

Now we need to compare the economic reasons given in options (B) and (D). Determine which one is the main reason for the repeal: (B) Stopping the spending of money on investigating alcohol smuggling is an economic reason, but it is focused on reducing the government's spending. (D) Gaining revenue from sales taxes on alcoholic beverages is an economic reason, which adds to the government's income.
03

Choose the main economic reason

Comparing (B) and (D), it is clear that gaining revenue is the main economic reason. The government would be more interested in increasing its income through tax revenue than reducing its spending on alcohol smuggling investigations. Therefore, the correct answer is (D).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Prohibition
Prohibition, widely known through the Eighteenth Amendment, was a significant period in United States history, enacted to curb alcohol consumption and its supposed societal ills.

Enforced from 1920 until its repeal in 1933, during Prohibition, the manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcoholic beverages were illegal. Although intended to improve public health and morality, Prohibition led to a surge in organized crime, unregulated bootlegging, and speakeasies, which were illicit establishments selling alcohol.

The societal landscape saw a dramatic change, as law-abiding citizens found themselves at odds with the law merely for wanting to drink alcohol. Moreover, the government faced enforcement challenges and a loss of tax revenue from the legal alcohol trade, which contributed to the eventual dissolution of Prohibition with the ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment.
Economic Reasons for Law Changes
Laws often change due to economic incentives or pressures. The repeal of Prohibition is a classic example of how economic factors can drive legislative transformation.

During Prohibition, the federal government and local authorities spent significant resources trying to enforce the ban on alcohol. This included costs related to policing, legal proceedings, and incarceration of lawbreakers. Concurrently, because the legal market for alcohol was stifled, the government was missing out on a substantial source of tax revenue.

The Great Depression, which began in 1929, further emphasized the need for economic recovery. The potential tax money from legalized alcohol presented a significant opportunity for the government to bolster its fiscal situation during these trying times. This economic reasoning laid the groundwork for changing the laws to reinstate the legal alcohol market.
Government Revenue from Taxes
Government revenue is crucial for funding public services, such as infrastructure, education, and defense. Taxes on goods and services are a primary means by which the government collects funds.

During Prohibition, one of the most pressing concerns was the government’s inability to collect taxes on the sale of alcoholic beverages. By lifting Prohibition with the Twenty-first Amendment, the government aimed to recapture this lost revenue.

Alcoholic beverages, once again legal, could be taxed, providing a source of income that had been missing for more than a decade. The sales taxes and excise taxes collected from the alcohol industry would go into federal and state coffers, thereby improving government budgets and funding essential services. As history shows, this economic benefit was a driving factor behind the repeal of Prohibition.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

All the following are features of a communist economy EXCEPT (A) all the factories are owned by the government, which controls all industries. (B) the prices of all goods and services are controlled by the government. (C) the government encourages entrepreneurs to start, own, and operate their own companies. (D) the government makes all economic decisions.

Why did President Truman decide that the United States should use atomic weapons against Japan on August 6, 1945? (A) The United States wanted to launch a preemptive strike to prevent the Japanese from attacking Pearl Harbor. (B) He wanted to force an immediate Japanese surrender to bring about an end to the war. (C) He wanted to see whether the newly developed atomic weapons actually worked.

In the late \(1800 \mathrm{~s}\), J. D. Rockefeller, the owner of Standard Oil, incorporated vertical and horizontal business practices into his business model by controlling the drilling, production, transportation, and sale of his products. As a result, he was able to (A) prevent monopolies from forming in the oil business. (B) allow smaller competitors easier entry into the oil business. (C) create a monopoly by controlling nearly 90 percent of the oil production in the U.S. (D) compete with his competition with only minimal success.

Toward the end of his speech, Dr. King used the quote "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal," taken from the Declaration of Independence. Why did Dr. King include this quote in his speech? (A) He was pointing out the differences between the rights of men and the rights of women. (B) He was trying to convince the audience that African Americans are superior to white Americans and should be treated as such. (C) He wanted African Americans to declare their independence from the United States. (D) He wanted to point out the hypocrisy of people who agree with the Declaration of Independence but don't agree with equal rights for African Americans.

The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and is one of the most important rights needed in a true democracy. Which of the following Supreme Court decisions is one of the best examples of protecting freedom of speech? (A) New York Times Co.v. United States in 1971 prohibited the newspaper for one year from printing an article containing damaging evidence about the government's actions in the Vietnam War. (B) The Fifth Amendment allows people accused of a crime to remain silent so as not to incriminate themselves. (C) The Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. Des Moines in 1969 that high school students could not wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. (D) In Texas v. Johnson in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled to protect the right to burn the U.S. flag as a form of symbolic speech.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on History Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.