91Ó°ÊÓ

The author would like to combine the two sentences reproduced below: His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time. Stefan was afforded every possible luxury and privilege. Which of the following gives the best combination of the two sentences? A) His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time; Stefan was afforded every possible luxury and privilege. B) Zweig was afforded every possible luxury and privilege because his parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time. C) Born to parents who were part of Vienna's Jewish cultural elite, Stefan was afforded every possible luxury and privilege. D) His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time, and so Stefan benefited from their eliteness with luxury.

Step by step solution

01

Option A

His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time; Stefan was afforded every possible luxury and privilege. This option combines the two sentences with a semicolon, which is generally used to connect two closely related independent clauses. However, it does not explicitly show the cause-and-effect relationship between the two sentences. #Step 2: Evaluate Option B#

02

Option B

Zweig was afforded every possible luxury and privilege because his parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time. This option combines the two sentences using the word "because," which explicitly shows the cause-and-effect relationship. It also states the correct name of the person, Stefan Zweig. #Step 3: Evaluate Option C#

03

Option C

Born to parents who were part of Vienna's Jewish cultural elite, Stefan was afforded every possible luxury and privilege. This option also correctly shows the cause-and-effect relationship by mentioning that Stefan was born to parents who were part of the Jewish cultural elite. The use of "born" effectively connects the two ideas while giving a sense of consequence. #Step 4: Evaluate Option D#

04

Option D

His parents were part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna at the time, and so Stefan benefited from their eliteness with luxury. This option connects the two sentences with the phrase "and so," which suggests a cause-and-effect relationship but does not express it as clearly as options B or C. It also uses the word "eliteness," which is not typically used in this context. #Step 5: Choose the best combination#

05

Select the best option

Based on the evaluation of each option, Option C is the best combination of the two sentences. It effectively shows the cause-and-effect relationship and provides a clear connection between Stefan and his privileged life due to his parents being part of the Jewish cultural elite in Vienna.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

• Full Textbook Solutions

  Get detailed explanations and key concepts

• Unlimited Al creation

  Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

• Ads-free access

  To over 500 millions flashcards

• Money-back guarantee

  We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sentence Combining

Sentence combining is a key skill on the SAT Writing and Language section. It involves merging two or more sentences into one without losing the original meaning. The goal is to create a sentence that is clear, concise, and shows the relationships between ideas. When combining sentences, students should look for ways to incorporate subordinate clauses, relative clauses, or use conjunctions to join ideas together. For instance, 'His parents were successful artists. He developed a love for painting early on.' can be combined to 'Having successful artists as parents, he developed a love for painting early on.' This skill is crucial for crafting sophisticated and fluid writing.

Grammar and Punctuation

Grammar and punctuation are the building blocks of clear communication in writing. On the SAT Writing and Language practice, these elements are tested rigorously. Students must understand the proper use of commas, semicolons, colons, dashes, and periods, as these marks can change the meaning of a sentence. For example, semicolons link two independent clauses that are closely related, as in 'I love to write; words are my playground.' Correct grammar and punctuation ensure that sentences accurately convey the intended message and are easily understood by the reader.

Rhetorical Skills

Rhetorical skills involve understanding and using language effectively to communicate clearly and persuasively. These skills are central to the SAT Writing and Language section, which assesses the ability to improve passages for coherence, style, and impact. Students must recognize and enhance rhetorical devices, such as parallel structure, tone, and word choice. For example, using parallel structure in a sentence like 'She likes cooking, jogging, and to read' can be improved to 'She likes cooking, jogging, and reading,' which has a more uniform structure and flow.

Cause-and-Effect Relationship

Understanding cause-and-effect relationships is crucial for crafting logical and persuasive arguments. In the context of SAT Writing and Language practice, it refers to the ability to link events or ideas by their causal relationship. For instance, when a sentence like 'It was raining, so the event was canceled' is used, it shows a direct cause (raining) for the effect (event being canceled). Recognizing these nuances in writing enables students to create richer, more compelling narratives and arguments within their essays.