/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 6 Advertisement: Anyone who exerci... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Advertisement: Anyone who exercises knows from firsthand experience that exercise leads to better performance of such physical organs as the heart and the lungs, as well as to improvement in muscle tone. And since your brain is a physical organ, your actions can improve its performance, too. Act now. Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain. The advertisement employs which one of the following argumentative strategies? (A) It cites experimental evidence that subscribing to the product being advertised has desirable consequences. (B) It ridicules people who do not subscribe to Stimulus by suggesting that they do not believe that exercise will improve brain capacity. (C) It explains the process by which the product being advertised brings about the result claimed for its use. (D) It supports its recommendation by a careful analysis of the concept of exercise. (E) It implies that brains and muscle are similar in one respect because they are similar in another respect.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The advertisement uses analogy: Option (E).

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The argument claims that exercise improves the performance of physical organs like the heart and lungs, and similarly implies that since the brain is also a physical organ, exercising it would improve its performance too.
02

Identify the Strategy

Examine the advertisement for any comparisons or analogies used. It draws a parallel between the improvement of physical organs through exercise and the brain, suggesting that it too can be improved by 'exercising' it through reading the magazine.
03

Analyze Each Option

Review each multiple-choice option to determine which best represents how the argument is structured. - (A) mentions experimental evidence, which is not present in the advertisement. - (B) talks about ridiculing non-subscribers, which the ad doesn't do. - (C) suggests a process description, but no detailed process is explained. - (D) implies a detailed concept analysis, which is not provided. - (E) suggests an analogy between brain and muscle improvement, fitting the strategy used.
04

Select the Best Option

Based on the analysis, option (E) fits best as it highlights the analogy strategy by comparing the brain to muscles, claiming similarity due to both being physical organs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Argument Analysis
In the world of logic and reasoning, analyzing an argument is crucial to understanding its structure and validity. The exercise presented an advertisement claiming that exercising the brain through reading a magazine improves its performance, similar to physical exercise improving other organs. To analyze this argument, we start by identifying its components: the premise and the conclusion.
The premise is that exercise enhances physical organs like the heart and lungs. The conclusion is that because the brain is a physical organ, it too will benefit from exercise, specifically through reading. This argument uses a method of reasoning that draws a conclusion based on the analogy between bodily organs and the brain.
  • Look for keywords that signal an inference, like "since" or "because".
  • Identify the supporting evidence for the conclusion.
  • Distinguish between stated and implied reasoning.
By engaging in argument analysis, we can better understand if the reasoning presented in the advertisement is logically sound or if it leaves room for questioning its conclusion.
Analogical Reasoning
Analogical reasoning is a type of thinking where one infers that if two or more things agree with one another in some respects, they will probably agree in others. In our advertisement example, the brain is being compared to physical muscles. The analogy suggests that because both the brain and muscles are physical organs, they improve through a similar type of stimulation or exercise.
To evaluate analogical reasoning, here's what you need to consider:
  • Similarity: Ensure that the items being compared share significant characteristics.
  • Relevance: Check if the similarities directly relate to the conclusion drawn.
  • Differences: Consider notable differences that might affect the conclusion.
The strength of analogical reasoning relies heavily on the relevance and extent of similarities. In the case of our advertisement, the argument depends on the analogy that exercising leads to performance improvement in physical organs, including the brain.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the disciplined process of actively and skillfully analyzing, assessing, and reconstructing arguments or statements that you encounter. It involves being open-minded and skeptical, questioning the validity of assertions made, especially as seen in persuasive advertisements.
Using critical thinking with the given exercise, one would ask:
  • Is there scientific evidence supporting the claim that mental exercise is analogous to physical exercise?
  • Are there alternative explanations for the claimed improvement in brain function?
  • What assumptions are being made about the nature of exercise and its effects on different organs?
Critical thinking helps peel back the layers of persuasion to evaluate whether the advertisement's claim stands up to scrutiny, encouraging skepticism and inquiry rather than blind acceptance.
Advertisement Strategies
In the competitive realm of advertisements, crafting persuasive messages is key. The exercise uses several strategic approaches to influence potential customers. One such strategy is analogical reasoning, as discussed earlier, to draw a connection between physical exercise and reading to improve the brain's function. This comparison is compelling because it taps into familiar experiences and perceived truths.
Effective advertisement strategies also include:
  • Emotional Appeal: Engaging the audience's feelings, like fear of missing out or desire for self-improvement.
  • Testimonial Use: Presenting customer reviews or endorsements to build credibility.
  • Urgency Creation: Promoting immediate action with call-to-action phrases like "Act now."
By employing these strategies, the advertisement aims to persuade the audience efficiently and effectively, leveraging logic, emotion, and urgency to drive action.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It can safely be concluded that there are at least as many trees in Seclee as there are in Martown. From which one of the following does the conclusion logically follow? (A) More trees were planted in Seclee in the past two years than in Martown. (B) Seclee is the region within which Martown is located. (C) Martown is suffering from an epidemic of tree-virus infection. (D) The average annual rainfall for Seclee is greater than the average annual rainfall for Martown. (E) The average number of trees cut down annually in Martown is higher than in Seclee.

In 1990 major engine repairs were performed on 10 percent of the cars that had been built by the National Motor Company in the 1970 s and that were still registered. However, the corresponding figure for the cars that the National Motor Company had manufactured in the 1960 s was only five percent. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the discrepancy? (A) Government motor vehicle regulations generally require all cars, whether old or new, to be inspected for emission levels prior to registration. (B) Owners of new cars tend to drive their cars more carefully than do owners of old cars. (C) The older a car is, the more likely it is to be discarded for scrap rather than repaired when major engine work is needed to keep the car in operation. (D) The cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1970 s incorporated simplified engine designs that made the engines less complicated than those of earlier models. (E) Many of the repairs that were performed on the cars that the National Motor Company built in the 1960 s could have been avoided if periodic routine maintenance had been performed.

Certain items-those with that hard-to-define quality called exclusivity-have the odd property, when they become available for sale, of selling rapidly even though they are extremely expensive. In fact, trying to sell such an item fast by asking too low a price is a serious error, since it calls into question the very thing-exclusivity - that is supposed to be the item's chief appeal. Therefore, given that a price that will prove to be right is virtually impossible for the seller to gauge in advance, the seller should make sure that any error in the initial asking price is in the direction of setting the price too high. The argument recommends a certain pricing strategy on the grounds that (A) this strategy lacks a counterproductive feature of the rejected alternative (B) this strategy has all of the advantages of the rejected alternative, but fewer of its disadvantages (C) experience has proven this strategy to be superior, even though the reasons for this superiority elude analysis (D) this strategy does not rely on prospective buyers \(^*\) estimates of value (E) the error associated with this strategy, unlike the error associated with the rejected alternative, is likely to go unnoticed

The author suggests that the total probate valuations of the personal property of individuals holding goods for sale in nineteenth-century Britain may have been (A) affected by the valuation conventions for such goods (B) less accurate than the valuations for such goods provided by income tax returns (C) less, on average, if such goods were tobacco-related than if they were alcohol-related (D) greater, on average, than the total probate valuations of those individuals who held bank balances (E) dependent on whether such goods were held by industrialists or by merchants or bankers

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) Academics respect only people who hold doctoral degrees. (B) All of this university's professors have obtained doctoral degrees. (C) At this university, every professor who holds a doctoral degree in computer science really knows about computers. (D) All academics who hold doctoral degrees are respected by their academic colleagues. (E) Among this university's staff members with doctoral degrees, only those in the computer science department really know about computers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.