/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 Many major scientific discoverie... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 5: Problem 24

Many major scientific discoveries of the past were the product of serendipity, the chance discovery of valuable findings that investigators had not purposely sought. Now, however, scientific research tends to be so costly that investigators are heavily dependent on large grants to fund their research. Because such grants require investigators to provide the grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of the proposed research, investigators ignore anything that does not directly bear on the funded research. Therefore, under the prevailing circumstances, serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? (A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research. (B) In the past few scientific investigators attempted to make clear predictions of the outcome of their research. (C) Dependence on large grants is preventing investigators from conducting the type of scientific research that those investigators would personally prefer. (D) All scientific investigators who provide grant sponsors with clear projections of the outcome of their research receive at least some of the grants for which they apply. (E) In general the most valuable scientific discoveries are the product of serendipity.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(A) Only findings that an investigator purposely seeks can directly bear on that investigator's research.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The argument claims that because modern research is expensive and requires grant funding, scientists must focus strictly on projected outcomes to get funding. Consequently, they ignore unexpected findings, hindering serendipitous discoveries.
02

Identify the Conclusion

The conclusion of the argument is that serendipity can no longer play a role in scientific discovery due to the current need for focused and projected research outcomes to secure funding.
03

Identify Assumptions

Assumptions are unstated premises that must hold true for the argument to be valid. Here, the argument relies on the assumption that only findings directly sought after in research can lead to a successful project, implying that unexpected findings are ignored.
04

Connect the Assumption to an Answer Choice

Review the answer choices to find one that supports the idea that unexpected findings (i.e., serendipity) are not pursued due to focused funding projections. Choice (A) mentions that only sought findings directly bear on research, which aligns with the assumption that serendipitous findings are ignored.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

scientific discovery
Scientific discovery refers to the process of exploring and understanding the natural world. It involves observation, experimentation, and analysis to uncover new facts or principles. Historically, scientific discovery has played a crucial role in advancing human knowledge and technology. Explorers of science strive to answer complex questions, solve real-world problems, and generally improve humanity's understanding of the universe.

Scientists rely on a combination of deliberate investigation and unexpected findings, known as serendipity, to make breakthroughs. Scientific research requires rigorous methodologies to ensure that results are reliable and valid. This systematic approach helps in verifying results through repeat experiments and peer review. Nonetheless, the heart of discovery often lies in the curiosity and perseverance of researchers dedicated to uncovering the unknown.

While serendipitous discoveries are sometimes stumbled upon unexpectedly, systematic research is vital for ongoing scientific progress. It serves as the foundation upon which scientists understand the known, thus making it easier to spot the unknown when they unintentionally encounter it.
research funding
Research funding is the financial support provided to conduct scientific investigations. It is a critical component of the scientific process, as it enables researchers to obtain necessary resources, such as equipment and personnel, to carry out their studies.

Funding usually comes from a variety of sources, including government agencies, private companies, and non-profit organizations. Each grant typically has specific requirements and expectations when it comes to the research outcomes.
  • Government funding often supports large-scale, long-term research projects that align with public interests.
  • Private companies might fund research that aligns with their commercial goals, often focusing on innovative technologies or healthcare solutions.
  • Non-profit organizations usually focus on research that has a societal impact, such as public health or environmental studies.

The dependency on research funding affects the direction of scientific inquiry, as researchers often tailor their proposals to align with the priorities of funding bodies. This focus can, at times, limit the scope of exploration, emphasizing outcomes that fit within predetermined expectations and potentially hindering unexpected findings from being pursued further.
serendipity in research
Serendipity in research refers to unexpected discoveries that arise during the pursuit of known objectives. These unforeseen findings can significantly impact scientific advancement, often leading to breakthroughs that weren't initially sought.

Famous instances of serendipity in research include the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming, who found the antibiotic properties of a mold by accident, and the creation of the microwave oven following Percy Spencer's experiments with radar technology.

Embracing serendipity requires an open-minded approach where researchers are curious and willing to explore unexpected results. It involves maintaining a flexible mindset to appreciate unanticipated data.
  • Paying attention to anomalies and outliers can lead to groundbreaking insights.
  • Allowing room in research agendas for unscripted exploration promotes innovation.

While current funding mechanisms often demand a focused approach to satisfy grant expectations, allowing space for serendipitous discoveries can enhance scientific research, fostering breakthroughs that might have otherwise been overlooked.
grant proposals
Grant proposals are formal submissions requesting financial support for research projects. These documents are crucial for acquiring research funding, as they outline a researcher's planned investigations and justify the resources needed.

A successful grant proposal typically includes:
  • A clear and compelling introduction that highlights the significance of the research problem.
  • Detailed methodology describing the approach, including any tools or techniques to be used.
  • Expected outcomes that align with the goals of the funding agency.
  • A budget breakdown to justify the funding request.
  • Background information demonstrating the researcher's qualifications and past achievements.

Writing an effective grant proposal requires aligning the research goals with the priorities of the funding body. Researchers need to demonstrate the potential impact of their work and convince funders of its value.

Grant proposals act as a double-edged sword in research; they are essential for securing necessary funds but can also constrain the creative flow of discovery by adhering strictly to predetermined outcomes. However, they remain an indispensable part of the academic and scientific ecosystems, facilitating the progression of numerous vital research projects.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Police statistics have shown that automobile antitheft devices reduce the risk of car theft, but a statistical study of automobile theft by the automobile insurance industry claims that cars equipped with antitheft devices are, paradoxically, more likely to be stolen than cars that are not so equipped. Which one of the following, if true, does the most to resolve the apparent paradox? (A) Owners of stolen cars almost invariably report the theft immediately to the police but tend to delay notifying their insurance company, in the hope that the vehicle will be recovered. (B) Most cars that are stolen are not equipped with antitheft devices, and most cars that are equipped with antitheft devices are not stolen. (C) The most common automobile antitheft devices are audible alarms, which typically produce ten false alarms for every actual attempted theft. (D) Automobile owners who have particularly theft-prone cars and live in areas of greatest incidence of car theft are those who are most likely to have antitheft devices installed. (E) Most automobile thefts are the work of professional thieves against whose efforts antitheft devices offer scant protection.

Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists' hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong. The argument against the marine biologists' hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions? (A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another. (B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together. (C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap. (D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available. (E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.

There is a widespread belief that people can predict impending earthquakes from unusual animal behavior. Skeptics claim that this belief is based on selective coincidence: people whose dogs behaved oddly just before an earthquake will be especially likely to remember that fact. At any given time, the skeptics say, some of the world's dogs will be behaving oddly. Clarification of which one of the following issues would be most important to an evaluation of the skeptics' position? (A) Which is larger, the number of skeptics or the number of people who believe that animal behavior can foreshadow earthquakes? (B) Are there means other than the observation of animal behavior that nonscientists can use to predict earthquakes? (C) Are there animals about whose behavior people know too little to be able to distinguish unusual from everyday behavior? (D) Are the sorts of behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes as pronounced in dogs as they are in other animals? (E) Is the animal behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes specific to impending earthquakes or can it be any kind of unusual behavior?

Before the printing press, books could be purchased only in expensive manuscript copies. The printing press produced books that were significantly less expensive than the manuscript editions. The public's demand for printed books in the first years after the invention of the printing press was many times greater than demand had been for manuscript copies. This increase demonstrates that there was a dramatic jump in the number of people who learned how to read in the years after publishers first started producing books on the printing press. Which one of the following statements, if true, casts doubt on the argument? (A) During the first years after the invention of the printing press, letter writing by people who wrote without the assistance of scribes or clerks exhibited a dramatic increase. (B) Books produced on the printing press are often found with written comments in the margins in the handwriting of the people who owned the books. (C) In the first years after the printing press was invented, printed books were purchased primarily by people who had always bought and read expensive manuscripts but could afford a greater number of printed books for the same money. (D) Books that were printed on the printing press in the first years after its invention often circulated among friends in informal reading clubs or libraries. (E) The first printed books published after the invention of the printing press would have been useless to illiterate people, since the books had virtually no illustrations.

Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the passage? (A) Gray marketing is unfair to trademark owners and should be legally controlled. (B) Gray marketing is practiced in many different forms and places, and legislators should recognize the futility of trying to regulate it. (C) The mechanisms used to control gray marketing across markets are different from those most effective in controlling gray marketing within markets. (D) The three trademark law theories that have been applied in gray marketing cases lead to different case outcomes. (E) Current theories used to interpret trademark laws have resulted in increased gray marketing activity.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

Morphology

Read Explanation

Creative Writing

Read Explanation

Listening and Speaking

Read Explanation

Text Comparison

Read Explanation

Synthesis Essay

Read Explanation

Linguistic Terms

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.