/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 When old-growth forests are clea... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

When old-growth forests are cleared of tall trees, more sunlight reaches the forest floor. This results in a sharp increase in the population of leafy shrubs on which the mule deer depend for food. Yet mule deer herds that inhabit cleared forests are less well-nourished than are herds living in old- growth forests. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox? (A) Mule deer have enzyme-rich saliva and specialized digestive organs that enable the deer to digest tough plants inedible to other deer species. (B) Mule deer herds that inhabit cleared forests tend to have more females with young offspring and fewer adult males than do other mule deer populations. (C) Mule deer populations are spread throughout western North America and inhabit hot, sunny climates as well as cool, wet climates. (D) As plants receive more sunlight, they produce higher amounts of tannins, compounds that inhibit digestion of the plants' proteins. (E) Insect parasites, such as certain species of ticks, that feed primarily on mule deer often dwell in trees, from which they drop onto passing deer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (D) resolves the paradox.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Paradox

The situation presents a paradox where mule deer, despite having more leafy shrubs (their food source) in cleared forests, are less well-nourished compared to those in old-growth forests. This paradox needs to be resolved by identifying a plausible explanation.
02

Interpret the Effect of Clearing Forests

Clearing old-growth forests allows more sunlight to reach the forest floor, promoting the growth of leafy shrubs. This is expected to improve the food availability for mule deer, yet their nourishment is less than expected.
03

Evaluate Option (A)

Option (A) suggests that mule deer can digest tough plants thanks to enzyme-rich saliva and specialized organs. This does not address why deer are less nourished despite more food.
04

Evaluate Option (B)

Option (B) notes demographic changes in the herd populations, such as more females with offspring and fewer adult males, but it doesn't directly relate to the issue of nutrition.
05

Evaluate Option (C)

Option (C) discusses the wide distribution of mule deer but does not address the specific nutrition issue related to cleared versus old-growth forests.
06

Evaluate Option (D)

Option (D) explains that plants exposed to increased sunlight produce more tannins, which inhibit protein digestion in the plants. This could mean that deer in cleared forests struggle to digest these leafy shrubs fully, leading to poorer nutrition.
07

Evaluate Option (E)

Option (E) involves the presence of insect parasites from trees, which could affect the health of deer, but this doesn't directly explain the paradox about food and nutrition.
08

Conclusion and Final Choice

Option (D) best explains the paradox: the increase in tannins due to more sunlight in cleared areas could make the shrubs less digestible, leading to poorer nutrition for the deer.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Old-Growth Forests
Old-growth forests are unique ecosystems characterized by their age, physical features, and biodiversity. These forests contain large and old trees, provide rich habitats, and support numerous species.
Old-growth forests remain largely untouched and continue to thrive because of their natural balance. They have thick canopies that regulate the amount of sunlight reaching the forest floor, which can affect the plant life and animals depending on them.
These forests play a crucial role in supporting species like the mule deer. The consistent environment helps provide stable food sources, climate conditions, and minimizes extreme environmental changes. When forests are cleared, the balance of this ecosystem suffers, influencing various species and their interactions.
Mule Deer Nutrition
Mule deer depend heavily on leafy shrubs for their diet, sourcing essential nutrients to stay healthy and active. They have adapted to digest tough plant materials using specialized enzymes.
In old-growth forests, the shrubs that deer feed on are not only abundant but also nutrient-rich. The quality of the shrubs can significantly influence the overall health and nutrition of the mule deer population.
  • Enzymes help break down complex plant materials.
  • Proper nutrition leads to healthier and more robust deer.
  • Mule deer rely on a consistent supply of nutritious plants.
When these forests are cleared, the sudden increase in shrubs does not necessarily equate to better nutrition, especially if the plants have higher tannin levels.
Environmental Factors
Environmental factors such as sunlight, temperature, and soil condition play a vital role in the growth of plants that support wildlife.
In old-growth forests, the stable environment supports the balanced growth of shrubs. These shrubs have a consistent nutritional profile, crucial for the mule deer's health.
When forests are cleared, more sunlight reaches the forest floor, potentially altering the chemical composition of plant life. For instance, as discussed in the original exercise, plants may produce more tannins.
  • Additional sunlight can change plant structures.
  • Increased tannins can limit protein absorption in deer.
  • Environmental stability is crucial for maintaining healthy wildlife populations.
Changes in these factors can, therefore, lead to differences in deer nutrition.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is essential when resolving paradoxes and understanding complex ecosystems. It involves evaluating information, recognizing assumptions, and distinguishing between facts and hypotheses.
The exercise presents a puzzle where, despite apparent food abundance, mule deer are less nourished in cleared forests. Resolving this requires critical thinking to identify underlying causes, such as higher tannin levels in the plants, preventing adequate digestion.
Critical thinking steps include:
  • Analyzing the facts and questioning assumptions.
  • Evaluating each option methodically and interpreting its relevance.
  • Recognizing indirect relationships and seeking more information if needed.
By using critical thinking, we can understand the broader impacts of environmental changes on animal nutrition.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken an argument of opponents of rDNA technology? (A) New safety procedures developed by rDNA researchers make it impossible for genetically altered microorganisms to escape from laboratories. (B) A genetically altered microorganism accidentally released from a laboratory is successfully contained. (C) A particular rDNA-engineered microorganism introduced into an ecosystem attracts predators that keep its population down. (D) Genetically altered organisms designed to process sewage into methane cannot survive outside the waste treatment plant. (E) A specific hereditary disease that has plagued humankind for generations is successfully eradicated.

Before the printing press, books could be purchased only in expensive manuscript copies. The printing press produced books that were significantly less expensive than the manuscript editions. The public's demand for printed books in the first years after the invention of the printing press was many times greater than demand had been for manuscript copies. This increase demonstrates that there was a dramatic jump in the number of people who learned how to read in the years after publishers first started producing books on the printing press. Which one of the following statements, if true, casts doubt on the argument? (A) During the first years after the invention of the printing press, letter writing by people who wrote without the assistance of scribes or clerks exhibited a dramatic increase. (B) Books produced on the printing press are often found with written comments in the margins in the handwriting of the people who owned the books. (C) In the first years after the printing press was invented, printed books were purchased primarily by people who had always bought and read expensive manuscripts but could afford a greater number of printed books for the same money. (D) Books that were printed on the printing press in the first years after its invention often circulated among friends in informal reading clubs or libraries. (E) The first printed books published after the invention of the printing press would have been useless to illiterate people, since the books had virtually no illustrations.

Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers have a lower conviction rate than those who rely on court-appointed public defenders. This explains why criminals who commit lucrative crimes like embezzlement or insider trading are more successful at avoiding conviction than are street criminals. The explanation offered above would be more persuasive if which one of the following were true? (A) Many street crimes, such as drug dealing, are extremely lucrative and those committing them can afford expensive private lawyers. (B) Most prosecutors are not competent to handle cases involving highly technical financial evidence and have more success in prosecuting cases of robbery or simple assault. (C) The number of criminals convicted of street crimes is far greater than the number of criminals convicted of embezzlement or insider trading. (D) The percentage of defendants who actually committed the crimes of which they are accused is no greater for publicly defended than for privately defended defendants. (E) Juries, out of sympathy for the victims of crimes, are much more likely to convict defendants accused of violent crimes than they are to convict defendants accused of "victimless" crimes or crimes against property.

Elena: While I was at the dog show, every dog that growled at me was a white poodle, and every white poodle I saw growled at me. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Elena's statement? (A) The only white dogs that Elena saw at the dog show were poodles. (B) There were no gray poodles at the dog show. (C) At the dog show, no gray dogs growled at Elena. (D) All the white dogs that Elena saw growled at her. (E) Elena did not see any gray poodles at the dog show.

There is a widespread belief that people can predict impending earthquakes from unusual animal behavior. Skeptics claim that this belief is based on selective coincidence: people whose dogs behaved oddly just before an earthquake will be especially likely to remember that fact. At any given time, the skeptics say, some of the world's dogs will be behaving oddly. Clarification of which one of the following issues would be most important to an evaluation of the skeptics' position? (A) Which is larger, the number of skeptics or the number of people who believe that animal behavior can foreshadow earthquakes? (B) Are there means other than the observation of animal behavior that nonscientists can use to predict earthquakes? (C) Are there animals about whose behavior people know too little to be able to distinguish unusual from everyday behavior? (D) Are the sorts of behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes as pronounced in dogs as they are in other animals? (E) Is the animal behavior supposedly predictive of earthquakes specific to impending earthquakes or can it be any kind of unusual behavior?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.