/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 A recent survey conducted in one... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A recent survey conducted in one North American city revealed widespread concern about the problems faced by teenagers today. Seventy percent of the adults surveyed said they would pay higher taxes for drug treatment programs, and 60 percent said they were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the city's schools. Yet in a vote in that same city, a proposition to increase funding for schools by raising taxes failed by a narrow margin to win majority approval. Which one of the following factors, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the discrepancy described above? (A) The survey sample was not representative of the voters who voted on the proposition. (B) Many of the people who were surveyed did not respond truthfully to all of the questions put to them. (C) The proposition was only part of a more expensive community improvement program that voters had to accept or reject in total. (D) A proposition for increasing funds for local drug treatment centers also failed to win approval. (E) The proposition to raise taxes for schools was couched in terminology that many of the voters found confusing.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option D is the least likely to explain the discrepancy.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Scenario

In the given problem, a survey indicated strong support for higher taxes to fund drug treatment programs and schools. However, a proposition to raise taxes for schools failed in a vote. The task requires identifying which of the given options LEAST explains this inconsistency.
02

Analyze Option A

Option A suggests that the survey sample was not representative of the voters who participated in the vote. If the survey sample differs from actual voters, it could help explain why the vote didn't reflect the survey results.
03

Analyze Option B

Option B proposes that survey respondents might not have been truthful in their responses. If people did not genuinely support higher taxes as indicated, this could explain the disconnect between survey results and the vote outcome.
04

Analyze Option C

Option C mentions that the tax proposition was just a part of a larger, more costly improvement plan. If voters were concerned with the overall cost, this could account for their rejection despite support for schools.
05

Analyze Option D

Option D states that a similar proposition for drug treatment centers also failed. This might suggest a general unwillingness to increase taxes, providing context for the school funding proposition's failure.
06

Analyze Option E

Option E claims that the proposition was phrased in confusing terminology. Confusion over the proposition could lead to widespread misunderstanding among voters, possibly resulting in the proposition's failure.
07

Conclusion

Options A, B, C, and E all provide plausible explanations for the discrepancy. However, Option D describes another instance of the same phenomenon (failure of a different tax increase), and does not directly address the discrepancy in the schools' proposition.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Survey Analysis
Survey analysis is the process of collecting and interpreting data from a selected group of individuals to understand trends, opinions, or behaviors. In the context of this exercise, a survey was conducted to gauge public opinion on tax increases for drug treatment programs and educational funding. The survey revealed that a significant portion of adults were willing to pay higher taxes for these causes. However, analyzing this data requires careful consideration of sample representation, question clarity, and respondent honesty. Common pitfalls in survey analysis include failing to have a representative sample, which can lead to skewed results that do not accurately reflect the larger population. It is also essential that survey questions are clear and unbiased to prevent misunderstandings that could distort the survey's findings. Effective survey analysis considers these factors to draw meaningful conclusions about public opinion.
Voting Behavior
Voting behavior refers to the different factors and influences that determine how individuals cast their votes in elections. In this exercise, there was a discrepancy between the survey results and the actual voting outcome concerning educational funding. This can partly be explained by examining voter turnout and demographics, both of which can significantly affect voting behavior. Different groups of people, for example, those of different ages, income levels, or education, might have different priorities and thus vote differently. Additionally, voter education and awareness on the issue can influence the way votes are cast. If a proposal is presented in a confusing manner or bundled with other changes, voters may not fully understand what they are voting for, resulting in outcomes that don't align with prior expressed support. Overall, understanding voting behavior involves recognizing how various social, economic, and psychological factors influence voter decisions.
Tax Policy
Tax policy involves the government strategies for managing taxes, focusing on how taxes are levied, collected, and utilized for public services. In the case of the city's proposition to raise taxes for educational funding, a detailed understanding of tax policy can shed light on the public's response. People are often willing to support higher taxes if they believe the funds will directly benefit community services they care about, such as schools or drug treatment centers. However, resistance may arise if individuals feel uncertain about the efficiency and allocation of these tax revenues. Clarity and transparency in tax policy can increase public trust and acceptance, ensuring that citizens understand both the purpose and the implications of tax changes. Moreover, the mechanism of presenting such tax adjustments—whether as separate entities or combined with other policy changes—can also influence public response and decision-making during votes.
Educational Funding
Educational funding is critical to the development and maintenance of quality schools and programs. It covers everything from building maintenance and teacher salaries to technological upgrades and student resources. Despite broad support indicated in surveys, increasing educational funding through tax hikes can face challenges during public votes due to factors such as economic concerns or the complexity of the funding proposal. When voters are faced with ambiguous or intricate funding plans, they may hesitate to approve them, even if they value the intended benefits. Therefore, clear communication and thorough explanations of how the funds will impact educational outcomes are essential. This helps in gaining the trust and approval of the public, ensuring successful implementation of necessary funding enhancements. Aligning educational funding proposals with straightforward, transparent policies can aid in overcoming resistance and fostering community support for school improvements.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Eight years ago hunting was banned in Greenfield County on the grounds that hunting endangers public safety. Now the deer population in the county is six times what it was before the ban. Deer are invading residential areas, damaging property and causing motor vehicle accidents that result in serious injury to motorists. Since there were never any hunting-related injuries in the county, clearly the ban was not only unnecessary but has created a danger to public safety that would not otherwise exist. Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the conclusion above? (A) In surrounding counties, where hunting is permitted, the size of the deer population has not increased in the last eight years. (B) Motor vehicle accidents involving deer often result in damage to the vehicle, injury to the motorist, or both. (C) When deer populations increase beyond optimal size, disease and malnutrition become more widespread among the deer herds. (D) In residential areas in the county, many residents provide food and salt for deer. (E) Deer can cause extensive damage to ornamental shrubs and trees by chewing on twigs and saplings.

Office manager: I will not order recycled paper for this office. Our letters to clients must make a good impression, so we cannot print them on inferior paper. Stationery supplier: Recycled paper is not necessarily inferior. In fact, from the beginning, the finest paper has been made of recycled material. It was only in the 1850 s that paper began to be made from wood fiber, and then only because there were no longer enough rags to meet the demand for paper. In which one of the following ways does the stationer's response fail to address the office manager's objection to recycled paper? (A) It does not recognize that the office manager's prejudice against recycled paper stems from ignorance. (B) It uses irrelevant facts to justify a claim about the quality of the disputed product. (C) It assumes that the office manager is concerned about environmental issues. (D) It presupposes that the office manager understands the basic technology of paper manufacturing. (E) It ignores the office manager's legitimate concern about quality.

Sabina: The words used in expressing facts affect neither the facts nor the conclusions those facts will support. Moreover, if the words are clearly defined and consistently used, the actual words chosen make no difference to an argument's soundness. Thus, how an argument is expressed can have no bearing on whether it is a good argument. Emile: Badly chosen words can make even the soundest argument a poor one. After all, many words have social and political connotations that influence people's response to claims expressed in those words, regardless of how carefully and explicitly those words are defined. Since whether people will acknowledge a fact is affected by how the fact is expressed, the conclusions they actually draw are also affected. The point at issue between Emile and Sabina is whether (A) defining words in one way rather than another can alter either the facts or the conclusions the facts will justify (B) a word can be defined without taking into account its social and political connotations (C) a sound argument in support of a given conclusion is a better argument than any unsound argument for that same conclusion (D) it would be a good policy to avoid using words that are likely to lead people either to misunderstand the claims being made or to reason badly about those claims (E) a factor that affects neither the truth of an argument's premises nor the logical relation between its premises and its conclusion can cause an argument to be a bad one

The author discusses the impact of gray marketing on goodwill in order to (A) fault trademark owners for their unwillingness to offer a solution to a major consumer complaint against gray marketing (B) indicate a way in which manufacturers sustain damage against which they ought to be protected (C) highlight one way in which gray marketing across markets is more problematic than gray marketing within a market (D) demonstrate that gray marketing does not always benefit the interests of unauthorized distributors (E) argue that consumers are unwilling to accept a reduction in price in exchange for elimination of service

The author mentions that goodwill was probably excluded from the probate valuation of a business in nineteenth-century Britain most likely in order to (A) give an example of a business asset about which little was known in the nineteenth century (B) suggest that the probate valuations of certain businesses may have been significant underestimations of their true market value (C) make the point that this exclusion probably had an equal impact on the probate valuations of all nineteenth-century British businesses (D) indicate that expectations about future profit-making is the single most important factor in determining the market value of certain businesses (E) argue that the twentieth-century method of determining probate valuations of a business may be consistently superior to the nineteenth-century method

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.