/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 17 It can be inferred from the auth... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

It can be inferred from the author's discussion of Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria that which one of the following would be true of crops impervious to parasitical organisms? (A) Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria would be absent from the soil surrounding their roots. (B) They would crowd out and eventually exclude other crop plants if their growth were not carefully regulated. (C) Their yield would not be likely to be improved by adding Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria to the soil. (D) They would mature more quickly than crop plants that were susceptible to parasitical organisms. (E) Levels of phytopathogenic bacteria in the soil surrounding their roots would be higher compared with other crop plants.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option C is correct: The yield of impervious crops would not likely improve with Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Role of Pseudomonas fluorescens

Pseudomonas fluorescens is known to protect crops from phytopathogenic bacteria and improve their yield by promoting healthy growth. The presence of this bacteria is beneficial for plants prone to infections by parasites.
02

Analyzing the Benefit for Impervious Crops

Crops that are impervious to parasitical organisms would not primarily rely on Pseudomonas fluorescens for protection against pathogens, as they are already resistant to such infections.
03

Identifying Overlapping Effects

Since impervious crops do not need additional protection from pathogens, adding Pseudomonas fluorescens should not further improve their yield, which is primarily associated with pathogen defense.
04

Conclusion Based on Analysis

Based on the information about the role of Pseudomonas fluorescens, the statement that their yield would not be likely to be improved by adding this bacteria to the soil is consistent with the functionality of the bacteria.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is a foundational skill needed for LSAT success. It involves the ability to analyze, evaluate, and construct arguments. In the context of the given exercise, logical reasoning helps in determining the correct inference about the crops and the role of Pseudomonas fluorescens bacteria.

To exercise logical reasoning, you must first break down the statements:
  • Identify premises and conclusions.
  • Evaluate the truth and relevance of each premise.
  • Determine whether conclusions logically follow from the premises.
For example, recognizing that crops which are impervious to parasitical organisms would not need the protective benefits of the bacteria is crucial. Logical reasoning aids in understanding these connections and drawing valid conclusions from given information.
Test Inference
Inference skills are critical for determining what can logically be deduced from a set of statements or data. During the LSAT, and specifically in this exercise, making accurate inferences relies on understanding the implicit information that can be drawn from explicit statements.

In this scenario, consider:
  • How Pseudomonas fluorescens benefits crops vulnerable to parasitical organisms by improving their yield.
  • The characteristics of crops that are naturally resistant and how adding additional protective bacteria might not have a significant impact on their growth.
These inferences are direct results of understanding the relationship between the crops' resistance and the role of the bacteria. Practicing inference can improve your LSAT scores and enhance your analytical precision.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment. It goes beyond merely recalling facts; it requires a deeper understanding of the concepts being tested. Within the context of the exercise, critical thinking involves questioning assumptions and exploring alternative solutions.

Apply critical thinking by:
  • Assessing the true need for Pseudomonas fluorescens in crops already impervious to pathogens.
  • Considering other factors that could affect crop yield scientific study, such as environmental conditions.
By developing critical thinking skills, students can challenge incorrect assumptions and identify the most logical outcome based on evidence.
Analytical Skills
Analytical skills involve the ability to deconstruct information into manageable parts, identify patterns, and solve problems effectively. On the LSAT, and in this exercise, these skills are essential to process complex information and arrive at accurate conclusions.

For instance:
  • When examining how Pseudomonas fluorescens affects different types of crops, analyze which benefits are exclusive to non-resistant plants.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of potential interventions in improving crop yields, even when basic pathogen resistance is present.
Having strong analytical skills helps unravel the multifaceted nature of problems, enabling more accurate and justified decisions. This is particularly advantageous for understanding the nuanced scenarios often presented in LSAT questions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In 1974 the speed limit on highways in the United States was reduced to 55 miles per hour in order to save fuel. In the first 12 months after the change, the rate of highway fatalities dropped 15 pereent, the sharpest one-year drop in history. Over the next 10 years, the fatality rate declined by another 25 percent. It follows that the 1974 reduction in the speed limit saved many lives. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? (A) The 1974 fuel shortage cut driving sharply for more than a year. (B) There was no decline in the rate of highway fatalities during the twelfth year following the reduction in the speed limit. (C) Since 1974 automobile manufacturers have been required by law to install lifesaving equipment, such as seat belts, in all new cars. (D) The fatality rate in highway accidents involving motorists driving faster than 55 miles per hour is much higher than in highway accidents that do not involve motorists driving at such speeds. (E) Motorists are more likely to avoid accidents by matching their speed to that of the surrounding highway traffic than by driving at faster or slower speeds.

Graphologists claim that it is possible to detect permanent character traits by examining people's handwriting. For example, a strong cross on the " \(t\) " is supposed to denote enthusiasm. Obviously, however, with practice and perseverance people can alter their handwriting to include this feature. So it seems that graphologists must hold that permanent character traits can be changed. The argument against graphology proceeds by (A) citing apparently incontestable evidence that leads to absurd consequences when conjoined with the view in question (B) demonstrating that an apparently controversial and interesting claim is really just a platitude (C) arguing that a particular technique of analysis can never be effective when the people analyzed know that it is being used (D) showing that proponents of the view have no theoretical justification for the view (E) attacking a technique by arguing that what the technique is supposed to detect can be detected quite readily without it

The critic's response to the historian is flawed because it (A) produces evidence that is consistent with there not having been any timber trade between Poran and Nayal during the third Nayalese dynasty (B) cites current laws without indicating whether the laws cited are relevant to the timber trade (C) fails to recognize that the historian's conclusion was based on indirect evidence rather than direct evidence (D) takes no account of the difference between a law's enactment at a particular time and a law's existence as part of a legal code at a particular time (E) accepts without question the assumption about the purpose of laws that underlies the historian's argument

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Many more people who currently walk to the library live in central Redville than in central Glenwood. (B) The number of people living in central Glenwood who would use the library if it were located there is smaller than the number of people living in central Redville who currently use the library. (C) The number of people using the public library would continue to increase steadily if the library were moved to Glenwood. (D) Most of the people who currently either drive to the library or take public transportation to reach it would continue to do so if the library were moved to central Glenwood. (E) Most of the people who currently walk to the library would remain library users if the library were relocated to central Glenwood.

Eight years ago hunting was banned in Greenfield County on the grounds that hunting endangers public safety. Now the deer population in the county is six times what it was before the ban. Deer are invading residential areas, damaging property and causing motor vehicle accidents that result in serious injury to motorists. Since there were never any hunting-related injuries in the county, clearly the ban was not only unnecessary but has created a danger to public safety that would not otherwise exist. Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest additional support for the conclusion above? (A) In surrounding counties, where hunting is permitted, the size of the deer population has not increased in the last eight years. (B) Motor vehicle accidents involving deer often result in damage to the vehicle, injury to the motorist, or both. (C) When deer populations increase beyond optimal size, disease and malnutrition become more widespread among the deer herds. (D) In residential areas in the county, many residents provide food and salt for deer. (E) Deer can cause extensive damage to ornamental shrubs and trees by chewing on twigs and saplings.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.