/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 13\. An irony resulting from the... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

13\. An irony resulting from the announcement that sharks will be placed on the managed species list is (A) We will now find out less about cancer, so in effect by saving the sharks, we are hurting ourselves. (B) sharks are far more dangerous to other fish than we are to them. (C) more chefs are now using the cartilaginous tissues found in shark fins. (D) more sharks are being killed now than before the announcement. (E) man will now protect a creature that he has been the victim of.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (D) is the irony: more sharks are being killed after announcing protection.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Irony

Irony involves a situation where the outcome is contrary to what one would expect. It's crucial to identify which of the given choices presents an unexpected or contradictory result from the announcement that sharks will be under management.
02

Analyzing Each Option

Go through each option and determine if it presents a contrast between expectation and reality: - (A): Saving sharks might reduce cancer research results, but it's not directly ironic concerning managing sharks. - (B): This suggests sharks are more dangerous to fish than us, but the management list is to protect them, not necessarily about their danger level. - (C): Using shark fins more due to the announcement doesn't display irony linked specifically to management. - (D): It suggests a paradox—attempt to protect leads to more deaths, which is ironic. - (E): Protecting something that might occasionally harm us aligns with irony.
03

Identifying the Most Ironic Situation

Based on the analysis, Option (D) 'more sharks are being killed now than before the announcement' is the most ironic. The paradox lies in the fact that while the intent was to protect sharks, the result is contrary because more are being killed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Irony
Irony is a fascinating concept in language and involves a situation where the outcome is the opposite of what is expected. It's like expecting sunshine but getting rain when you're all set for a beach day. In the context of LSAT preparation, understanding irony helps in recognizing discrepancies and contradictions in arguments.

When examining irony, think about:
  • Expectations vs. Reality: Look for situations where what is happening differs radically from what one would logically anticipate.
  • Contradictory Outcomes: Identify instances where the intended outcome is not achieved, and the opposite occurs instead.
In the exercise described, the irony arises from the announcement meant to protect sharks, yet potentially resulting in more harm to them—truly a situation diverging from reasonable expectations.
Logical Reasoning Skills
Developing logical reasoning skills is crucial for tackling LSAT questions effectively. These skills involve being able to assess arguments, draw conclusions, and identify logical fallacies. When you're faced with choices, as in the original exercise, logical reasoning helps dissect each option logically.

To sharpen these skills, consider the following tips:
  • Evaluate Each Argument: Break down the reasoning in each option to see if it follows a logical path.
  • Spot the Contradictions: Look for illogical or contradictory statements in the arguments presented.
  • Draw Informed Conclusions: Use evidence and reason to reach conclusions that make sense.
Logical reasoning skills not only aid in solving LSAT questions but also enhance your ability to make sound decisions in everyday life.
Analyzing Paradoxes
Paradoxes are statements or situations that defy intuition by having seemingly contradictory aspects. They play a significant role in challenges like the LSAT, as they require deep analysis and understanding.

To effectively analyze paradoxes, keep these points in mind:
  • Identify the Contradiction: Look for the elements of the situation that seem to oppose each other.
  • Understand the Context: Context can illuminate why a paradox exists and how it can occur logically.
  • Think Critically: Use critical thinking to delve into possible explanations for the paradoxical nature of a situation.
In the discussed exercise, the paradox is that an effort to save sharks results in more being killed, challenging our conventional understanding and expectations. Recognizing and evaluating this paradox helps in selecting the most ironic outcome in the context of the question.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Students who are "dualistic" thinkers may not be able to support their beliefs convincingly because (A) most of their beliefs cannot be supported by arguments. (B) they have accepted their "truths" simply because authorities have said these things are "true." (C) they half-believe and half-disbelieve just about everything. (D) their teachers almost always think that "dualistic" thinkers are wrong. (E) they are enslaved by their authorities.

According to the provisions of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as described in the passage, if the President perceives that an international conflict warrants the immediate involvement of United States armed forces, the President is compelled in every instance to (A) request that Congress consider a formal declaration of war (B) consult with the leaders of both houses of Congress before deploying armed forces (C) desist from deploying any troops unless expressly approved by Congress (D) report to Congress within 48 hours of the deployment of armed forces (E) withdraw any armed forces deployed in such a conflict within 60 days unless war is declared

An irony resulting from the announcement that sharks will be placed on the managed species list is (A) We will now find out less about cancer, so in effect by saving the sharks, we are hurting ourselves. (B) sharks are far more dangerous to other fish than we are to them. (C) more chefs are now using the cartilaginous tissues found in shark fins. (D) more sharks are being killed now than before the announcement. (E) man will now protect a creature that he has been the victim of.

Scientists have observed that shorter wavelength light has more energy than longer wavelength light. From this we can conclude that (A) red light will exert more energy when it hits the surface of the earth than will blue light. (B) lightning is caused by the collision of blue light with particles in the air. (C) red light will travel faster than blue light. (D) blue light has more energy than red light. (E) blue light has less energy than red light.

If students were asked to write essays on the different concepts of tragedy as exemplified by Cordelia and Antigone, and they all responded by showing how each character exemplified a traditional definition of tragedy, we could, according to the passage, hypothesize which one of the following about these students? (A) The students were locked into the relativist stage. (B) The students had not advanced beyond the dualist stage. (C) The students had at least achieved the multiplicity stage. (D) The students had reached the commitment stage. (E) We have no indication of which cognitive stage the students were in.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.