/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 18 Leaming how to build a nest play... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Leaming how to build a nest plays an important part in the breeding success of birds. For example, Dr. Snow has recorded the success of a number of blackbirds in several successive years. He finds that birds nesting for the first time are less successful in breeding than are older birds, and also less successful than they themselves are a year later. This cannot be a mere matter of size and strength, since blackbirds, like the great majority of birds, are fully grown when they leave the nest. It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that they benefit by their nesting experience. Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument? (A) Blackbirds build better nests than other birds. (B) The capacity of blackbirds to lay viable eggs increases with each successive trial during the first few years of reproduction. (C) The breeding success of birds nesting for the second time is greater than that of birds nesting for the first time. (D) Smaller and weaker blackbirds breed just as suecessfully as bigger and stronger blackbirds. (E) Up to 25 percent of all birds are killed by predators before they start to nest.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (B) weakens the argument by suggesting an alternative reason for improved breeding success.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Argument

The argument claims that learning to build a nest is crucial to the breeding success because first-time nesters are less successful than those with experience, implying experience, not physical development, improves breeding success.
02

Look for the Weakening Evidence

You need evidence that suggests factors other than nesting experience could be responsible for improved breeding success in subsequent years and not merely the experience of building nests.
03

Analyze Each Option

- **(A)** states blackbirds build better nests than other birds, which doesn't directly address the reasoning of the argument. - **(B)** suggests the capacity to lay viable eggs increases with successive tries, providing an alternative reason for breeding success that isn't related to nesting experience. - **(C)** restates part of the argument, supporting not weakening it. - **(D)** supports the argument by showing size isn't affecting success, aligning with the argument. - **(E)** mentions predation rates not directly related to the argument's claims.
04

Identify the Most Weakening Option

Option (B) directly challenges the argument by providing a biological reason—improved egg viability—explaining the improved success rate not related to nesting experience.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Argument Analysis
Argument analysis involves dissecting a statement or a series of statements to understand the core conclusion and the evidence presented to support it. In this exercise, the argument is about the nesting success of blackbirds. The conclusion drawn is that birds improve their breeding success due to the learning or experience they gain from previous nesting attempts, not from physical changes. To analyze this argument, identify two main components:
  • Conclusion: Experience in nesting leads to improved breeding success.
  • Premises: First-time nesters are less successful than in subsequent attempts; birds are fully grown physically when leaving the nest.
The goal of argument analysis is to determine whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises provided. By doing so, one can evaluate the strength and validity of the argument. If you identify assumptions or notice missing information, these become crucial points in critical evaluation.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is essential when evaluating an argument, allowing you to discern between strong and flawed conclusions. It requires analyzing the argument beyond face value and asking whether the argument is logically sound. In this context, consider:
  • The assumptions: The argument assumes that experience is the only factor affecting breeding success.
  • Alternative explanations: Are there other factors, like egg viability or learning from trial and error, that might contribute to success?
  • Evidence evaluation: Is the evidence provided adequate and relevant to support the conclusion?
Critical thinking involves questioning each piece of the argument and its evidential link. It's about not taking things at face value, checking biases, and ensuring every claim is backed by appropriate logic or evidence.
Logical Reasoning Questions
Logical reasoning questions test your ability to understand and evaluate arguments similar to those found in the LSAT. Such questions require you to identify, strengthen, weaken, or draw parallels from given statements to ensure a deep comprehension of logical principles at play. To tackle logical reasoning questions effectively:
  • Identify conclusions and premises: Clarifying these helps locate the argument's foundation.
  • Consider counterexamples or alternative scenarios: Examine options that might offer different explanations or contradict the argument's premises.
  • Analyze options methodically: Understand each possible answer, asking how it fits or contests the argument structure.
Logical reasoning questions demand clear, concise thinking. Practice recognizing patterns, strengthening your comprehension, and questioning assumptions to excel in these types of queries.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people's tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentrating on sex and violence, thus appealing to different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument? (A) The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers. (B) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication. (C) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew. (D) People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence. (E) It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.

There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably welleducated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered to be great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together. Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage? (A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues. (B) A thorough education in art makes a person reasonably well educated. (C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political isswes than any artist. (D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent. (E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well- educated persons who are not artists.

The teeth of some mammals show "growth rings" that result from the constant depositing of layers of cementum as opaque bands in summer and translucent bands in winter. Cross sections of pigs' teeth found in an excavated Stone Age trash pit revealed bands of remarkably constant width except that the band deposited last, which was invariably translucent, was only about half the normal width. The statements above most strongly support the conclusion that the animals died (A) in an unusually early winter (B) at roughly the same age (C) roughly in midwinter (D) in a natural catastrophe (E) from starvation

Dried grass clippings mixed into garden soil gradually decompose, providing nutrients for beneficial soil bacteria. This results in better-than-average plant growth. Yet mixing fresh grass clippings into garden soil usually causes poorer-than-average plant growth. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the difference in plant growth described above? (A) The number of beneficial soil bacteria increases whenever any kind of plant material is mixed into garden soil. (B) Nutrients released by dried grass clippings are immediately available to beneficial soil bacteria. (C) Some dried grass clippings retain nutrients originally derived from commercial lawn fertilizers, and thus provide additional enrichment to the soil. (D) Fresh grass clippings mixed into soil decompose rapidly, generating high levels of heat that kill beneficial soil bacteria. (E) When a mix of fresh and dried grass clippings is mixed into garden soil, plant growth often decreases.

A major theft from a museum was remarkable in that the pieces stolen clearly had been carefully selected. The criterion for selection, however, clearly had not been greatest estimated market value. It follows that the theft was specifically carried out to suit the taste of some individual collector for whose private collection the pieces were destined. The argument tacitly appeals to which one of the following principles? (A) Any art theft can, on the evidence of the selection of pieces stolen, be categorized as committed either at the direction of a single known individual of at the direction of a group of known individuals. (B) Any art theft committed at the direction of a single individual results in a pattern of works taken and works left alone that defies rational analysis. (C) The pattem of works taken and works left alone can sometimes distinguish one type of art theft from another. (D) Aft thefts committed with no preexisting plan for the disposition of the stolen works do not always involve theft of the most valuable pieces only. (E) The pattern of works taken and works left alone in an art theft can be particularly damaging to the integrity of the remaining collection.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.