/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.25 You own a house worth $800,000 t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

You own a house worth $800,000 that is located on a river bank. If the river floods moderately, the house will be completely destroyed. This happens about once every 50 years. If you build a seawall, the river would have to flood heavily to destroy your house, which only happens about once every 200 years. What would be the annual premium for a flood insurance policy that offers full insurance? For a policy that pays only 70% of the home value, what are your expected costs with and without a seawall? Do the different policies provide an incentive to be safer (i.e., to build the seawall) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified

If the yearly expense of the structure and keeping a seawall is under $11,200each year, we can say that neither the insurance policy will be better or worse.

Step by step solution

01

Content Introduction

The annual project cost is the projection sum that might be brought about in finishing a predetermined task. It is a piece of capital planning used to decide real fixed-cost agreements with different parties.

02

Content Explanation

With full insurance the expected loss is 800,0000.02=16,000

With a seawall, the expected loss is localid="1649654243299" 800,0000.005=4000

The estimated loss will be charged as a premium by the insurance company. The premium is the annual expense you can expect in either circumstance.

With partial insurance,

Without a seawall, the expected loss is 0.780,0000.02=11,200

With a seawall, the expected loss is 0.7800,0000.005=2,800

The estimated loss will be charged as a premium by the insurance company. The premium is the annual expense you can expect in either circumstance.

Without the seawall, [0.02(5,60,000-800,000)+0.98(0)]-11.200=-16,000

With a seawall, [0.005(5,60,000-800,000)+0.98]-2,800=-4000

Tragically, neither the insurance contract is better nor it is regrettable. Although the expenses under the fractional are lower, the normal expense every year is equivalent to full protection.

Regardless you will build the seawall if the annual cost of building and maintaining a seawall is under $11,200 each year.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each of the following countries, identify the single most important (largest) and least important (smallest) source of external funding: United States; Germany; Japan; Canada. Comment on the similarities and differences among the countries鈥 funding sources.

You wish to hire Ron to manage your Dallas operations. The profits from the operations depend partially on how hard Ron works, as follows

If Ron is lazy, he will surf the Internet all day, and he views this as a zero-cost opportunity. However, Ron views working hard as a 鈥減ersonal cost鈥 valued at $2000. What fixed percentage of the profits should you offer Ron? Assume Ron cares only about his expected payment less any 鈥減ersonal cost.鈥

Suppose you go to your local bank, intending to buy a certificate of deposit with your savings. Explain why you would prefer this to offering a loan, at an interest rate that is higher than the rate the bank pays on certificates of deposit (but lower than the rate the bank charges for car loans), to the next individual who enters the bank and applies for a car loan.

Gustavo is a young doctor who lives in a country with a relatively inefficient legal and financial system. When Gustavo applied for a mortgage, he found that banks usually required collateral for up to 300% of the amount of the loan. Explain why banks might require that much collateral in such a financial system. Comment on the consequences of such a system for economic growth.

What steps can the government take to reduce asymmetric information problems and help the financial system function more smoothly and efficiently?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.