/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 5PA This problem uses the analogy of... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

This problem uses the analogy of a 鈥渓eaky bucket鈥 to explain one constraint on the redistribution of income.

a. What elements of the U.S. system for redistributing income create the leaks in the bucket? Be specific.

b. Between Republicans and Democrats, who do you think generally believes that the bucket used for redistributing income is leaky? How does that belief affect their views about the amount of income redistribution that the government should undertake?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The regressive tax system in the U.S. is the dominant element that creates leakages in the income redistribution bucket, which widens the income gap in the economy.

b. The Republicans believe that the government is using a leaky bucket for income redistribution. It should consider shifting to a progressive tax system that will be more effective in reducing the income gap than the regressive tax regime.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation for part (a)

The leaky bucket analogy introduced by economist Arthur Okun explains that the income redistribution policy, which snatches the money from the rich and gives to the poor, is inappropriate for the government. It brings inefficiency to the economy.

The income taken from the rich through taxation is not fully transferred to the poor but is lost in the taxation and transfer costs. Also, the transfer of income reduces the incentive for working for the rich and poor. As their income increases, the transfer of payments to the poor are reduced, and marginal tax rates snatch a more significant proportion of income from the upper-income group.

The U.S. system involves a leaky income redistribution policy. The U.S. system applies a regressive tax system. It snatches the income from the poor, transfers to the richest group, and maintains its funds. It makes the poor poorer, and the rich become more affluent, widening the income gap.

02

Explanation for part (b)

The Democrats prefer a regressive tax system saying that it covers the loophole of the tax system. On the other hand, the Republicans stand for a fair taxation policy from an individual perspective. It says that the country should adopt a progressive tax system to pay a fair proportion of an individual鈥檚 income to the government. Hence, the Republicans believe that the bucket of income redistribution is leaky.

This perspective of the Republicans supports the argument that the size of taxes for government funding should be according to the income of the individuals. It will boost more income equality in the economy as both the richest and poorest will contribute an equal proportion of income to the government funding.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 15.2 and Exercise 15.3 asked you to

describe the labor-leisure tradeoff for Jonathon. Since,

in the first example, there is no monetary incentive for

Jonathon to work, explain why he may choose to work

anyway. Explain what the opportunity costs of working

and not working might be for Jonathon in each example.

Using your tables and graphs from Exercise 15.2 and

Exercise 15.3, analyze how the government welfare

system affects Jonathan鈥檚 incentive to work.

Identify some public policies that can reduce the

level of economic inequality.

What are the main reasons economists give for the

increase in inequality of incomes?

The poverty rate would be substantially lower if the market value of in-kind transfers were added to family income. The largest in-kind transfer is Medicaid, the government health program for the poor. Lets say the program costs \(10,000 per recipient family.

a. If the government gave each recipient family a \)10,000 check instead of enrolling them in the Medicaid program, do you think that most of these families would spend that money to purchase health insurance? Why? (Recall that the poverty level for a family of four is about $25,000.)

b. How does your answer to part (a) affect your view about whether we should determine the poverty rate by valuing in-kind transfers at the price the government pays for them? Explain.

c. How does your answer to part (a) affect your view about whether we should provide assistance to the poor in the form of cash transfers or in-kind transfers? Explain.

Describe how each of these changes is likely to affect poverty and inequality:

a. Incomes rise for low-income and high-income workers, but rise more for the high-income earners.

b. Incomes fall for low-income and high-income workers, but fall more for high-income earners.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Economics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.